Peer Review for Project 4
Part One: Draft Submission.
Post a link to complete drafts of at least two of your articles. (Three articles are required in the final Project 4).
Part Two: Peer Feedback. Provide peer feedback on drafts.
Your instructor will assign peer partners. The following prompts should guide your peer review, an important step in drafting. You don’t necessarily have to respond to each and every prompt, but you should respond, in one way or another, to a majority of them. Don’t be limited by these prompts, though: Share any and all feedback you have for your peers.
If you’d like, you can also download the questions as a Word file that you can then fill out and return to your partner(s): Project 4 Peer Feedback Questions.docx attached below
Are the topics for the articles interesting, up-to-date and relevant? Do they work to increase the professional authorship of the writer? Offer suggestions for improvement.
Are the articles written according to the writing for the web guidelines in our course, including front-loaded content, obvious signposts, links to outside sources, etc.? Offer suggestions for improvement.
Comment on the design of the articles. Are the articles attractively designed and eye-catching? Are visuals effective and appropriate? Do they include captions and links where appropriate? Offer suggestions for improvement.
Is the title informative and interesting? Are there informative headings in addition to the title?
Is the writing conversational? Is it also correct? Make suggestions for improvement.
Most online article and blog writing utilizes even shorter paragraphs (usually around 25-35 words). Articles should also be between 300-600 words.
