DBA8100 WALDEN Strategies For Night Audit Of Employees In The Hotel Industry

Superior 140
(70%) points

Student presents a thorough and detailed submission of the agreed upon component(s) from the Session Plan. Submission fully addresses all the components on the Doctoral Study rubric related to his/her Session Plan.

Excellent 133 (66.5%) points

Student presents a thorough and detailed submission of the agreed upon component(s) from the Session Plan. Submission fully addresses all the components on the Doctoral Study rubric related to his/her Session Plan; however, there is minor feedback to address to more fully align and/or address the components. See paper for specific feedback.

Satisfactory 119 (59.5%) points

Student presents his/her submission of the agreed upon component(s) from the Session Plan. Submission mostly addresses the components on the Doctoral Study rubric related to his/her Session Plan; however some revisions are necessary. See paper for specific feedback.

Marginal 105 (52.5%) points

Student does not present all the agreed upon components from the Session Plan and/or does not address the majority of the components from the Doctoral Study rubric. Major revisions are needed. See paper for specific feedback.

Unsatisfactory 70 (35%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

Not Submitted 0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Superior 30
(15%) points

Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are no spelling or grammar errors.

Excellent 28.5 (14.25%) points

Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are one or two minor errors in spelling or grammar.

Satisfactory 25.5 (12.75%) points

Student mostly follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are some errors in spelling or grammar.

Marginal 22.5 (11.25%) points

Student does not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style and does not communicate in a cohesive, logical style.

Unsatisfactory 15 (7.5%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

Not Submitted 0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Superior 30
(15%) points

Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are no APA errors.

Excellent 28.5 (14.25%) points

Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are one or two minor errors in APA style or format.

Satisfactory 25.5 (12.75%) points

Student mostly adheres to scholarly reference requirements and/or mostly adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Some errors in APA format and style are evident.

Marginal 22.5 (11.25%) points

Student demonstrates weak or inconsistent adherence scholarly reference requirements and/or weak or inconsistent adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Several errors in APA format and style are evident.

Unsatisfactory 15 (7.5%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

Not Submitted 0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.