to think critically about your chosen reading’s rhetorical strategies, and to construct your own argument about their effectiveness in writing
Instructions
Purpose: to think critically about your chosen reading’s rhetorical strategies, and to construct your own argument about their effectiveness in writing.
Task: Using your Unit 2 Discussion work as an outline, complete the following:
Begin the document with the thesis, which should be 1-2 sentences that argues how the author creates a persuasive–or unpersuasive–argument. Be sure to revise your thesis based on your feedback from Discussion 2.2.
Then, develop 3 or 4 body paragraphs (refer to Chapter 6.2: Effective Means of Writing a Paragraph) using the supporting sentences (or claims) that you identified in Discussion 2.2. The first sentence of each body paragraph should serve as a strong topic sentence (which should be the claim that supports the thesis). Examples from the text should be specific–and support your thesis/argument/claim(s); in addition, quotes and summaries should be properly cited, using MLA guidelines. Do not include quotes longer than 3 lines. Include a Works Cited page at the end of your essay, in the same file. Refer to ACC: Works Cited Examples for assistance with this.
Unify these paragraphs by making sure that each one supports your thesis and that each paragraph includes transition words and phrases to make the essay flow organically from one paragraph to the next.
Read through your essay and refer back to the More About the Rhetorical Analysis Essay Assignment page to make sure your essay meets these requirements.
Leave time to submit your draft to the Free Tutoring/Smarthinking for review. Your Smarthinking tutor can help with thesis and content development, organization, grammar, and mechanics. Utilize this free service to write the best draft possible on this major assignment.
Don’t forget that you can submit your draft to Smarthinking multiple times during the revision process.
Criteria on which you will be graded: A good grade on this assignment (the Rough Draft) reflects that you have completed this assignment to specifications. It does not mean that your final paper will earn the same grade. Your instructor may highlight instances of editorial errors; and, while points will not be deducted for grammar and spelling mistakes here, incomprehensible writing will not earn a “passing grade.”
Rough drafts will graded on your thesis’s specificity and development (25%)
Rough draft will be graded on how you develop and support your argument (your supporting claims, your logic and organization) (25%)
Rough drafts will be graded on paragraph development and organization, to include topic sentences, conclusions, transitions (logic, flow) (20%)
Rough drafts will be graded on engagement with the text (how you explain your examples, your choice of supporting quotations) (20%)
Rough drafts will be graded on proper MLA citation and a correctly formatted Works Cited page, although on a lesser scale than the rest of the criteria. (10%)
Points may be deducted if the following format is not followed:
On the first page of your assignment, include your name, date, and assignment name
Font format: 12pt in a standard serif font such as Times New Roman, double spaced
Submit your assignment as a Word DOC or DOCX file to the Assignment Box
The post to think critically about your chosen reading’s rhetorical strategies, and to construct your own argument about their effectiveness in writing ACADEMIC ASSISTERS. ACADEMIC ASSISTERS.
>>>Click here to get this paper written at the best price. 100% Custom, 0% plagiarism.<<<
The post to think critically about your chosen reading’s rhetorical strategies, and to construct your own argument about their effectiveness in writing appeared first on First Class Essay Writers.
