Discussion: Critique of a Quantitative Review
Discussion: Critique of a Quantitative Review
Discussion: Critique of a Quantitative Review
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT : Discussion: Critique of a Quantitative Review
Critique a quantitative study for design elements and study validity. Use the guidelines for critiquing design elements and study validity, Box 10.1 of your textbook. Read the Introduction and Methods section of the assigned quantitative article (refer to the entirety of the article as needed) and write a paper (no more than 3-5 pages) evaluating the article for critical elements for design and validity. The article may also be found in the Tookit accompanying the Resource Manual. Be sure to read carefully, and pay attention to grammar, sentence structure, and APA guidelines. Be sure to refer to the Rubric used to grade this assignment.
Teresi, J., Ramirez, M., Ellis, J., Silver, S., Boratgis, G., Kong, J.,…Lachs, M. (2013). A staff intervention targeting (Links to an external site.)
resident-to-resident elder mistreatment (R-REM) in long-term care increased staff knowledge, recognition and (Links to an external site.)
reporting: Results from a cluster randomized trial. (Links to an external site.) International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50, 644-656.
Critique a quantitative study for design elements and study validity. Use the guidelines for critiquing design elements and study validity, Box 10.1 of your textbook. Read the Introduction and Methods section of the assigned quantitative article (refer to the entirety of the article as needed) and write a paper (no more than 3-5 pages) evaluating the article for critical elements for design and validity. The article may also be found in the Tookit accompanying the Resource Manual. Be sure to read carefully, and pay attention to grammar, sentence structure, and APA guidelines. Be sure to refer to the Rubric used to grade this assignment.
Teresi, J., Ramirez, M., Ellis, J., Silver, S., Boratgis, G., Kong, J.,…Lachs, M. (2013). A staff intervention targeting (Links to an external site.)
resident-to-resident elder mistreatment (R-REM) in long-term care increased staff knowledge, recognition and (Links to an external site.)
reporting: Results from a cluster randomized trial. (Links to an external site.) International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50, 644-656.
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
Use the following coupon code :
NPS10
The post Discussion: Critique of a Quantitative Review appeared first on Savvy Essay Writers.
