instructor feedback
Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the guidelines below.
PICOT Question
Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor.
The final PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).
Research Critiques
In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments, you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique on two articles for each type of study (4 articles total). Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of each study by making appropriate revisions.
The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT question.
Refer to “Research Critiques and PICOT Guidelines – Final Draft.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper.
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change
Discuss the link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes.
General Requirements
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesW
Research Critique Guidelines – Part II
Use this document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, and reference content from the studies in your responses.
Quantitative Studies
Background
1. Summary of studies. Include problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research question.
How do these two articles support the nurse practice issue you chose?
1. Discuss how these two articles will be used to answer your PICOT question.
2. Describe how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in your PICOT question.
Method of Study:
1. State the methods of the two articles you are comparing and describe how they are different.
2. Consider the methods you identified in your chosen articles and state one benefit and one limitation of each method.
Results of Study
1. Summarize the key findings of each study in one or two comprehensive paragraphs.
2. What are the implications of the two studies you chose in nursing practice?
Outcomes Comparison
1. What are the anticipated outcomes for your PICOT question?
2. How do the outcomes of your chosen articles compare to your anticipated outcomes?
© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
2
Running Heading – Critical Appraisal 1
2
CRITICAL APPRAISAL
KARANVIR KAUR
Grand Canyon University
NRS-433V
May 24, 2020
Quantitative Studies
Introduction
Fall prevention in nursing and long-term care facilities for older and vulnerable population remains critical issue better health care results for millions of aged people. In this article make a critical appraisal of two quantitative research studies in relation to addressing the PICOT question in the study of falls among adults based on the research critique guidelines.
Backgrounds
In their study, Albert, assessed the quality and importance of using non-randomized study is for principal prevention of fall for older adults. Albert also gave information about the current models in falls prevention Is all depend on the use of both secondary and other strategies that increased risk of falls. This article is most significantly to the nursing practice all the nurses work in the long term and rehabilitation nursing care facilities that deal with the elderly adults who are very highly risk to the falls. Comment by Melissa Reedy: Include the date of the publication in () Comment by Melissa Reedy: Significant Be sure to either use the writing center of GCU or download Grammarly to help you proof read your papers so that your sentences are complete and flow well.
In this study, Albert identify the lack of research on the effectiveness of these strategies. Through the development of a non-randomized trial in the state of Pennsylvania, the researcher Comment by Melissa Reedy: Identifies
Question for the study was, does a combination of education on falls and screening as well as referrals reduce risk factors for falls among the target population. Comment by Melissa Reedy: No need to capitalize
The second quantitve study by Alvarez how the falls can be reduced by the all the vulnerable and older population in the Assisted Living and long-term care facilities by giving the knowledge about the exercise and using the exercise training. Alvarez also recommended that use of the training exercise means for professionals LNS to provide the education to the CNA to monitor the patients during changing the patient helping them to manage the falls in the older population. The study problem was effectiveness of the strategies and exercising program and fall incidents in the same older population. Comment by Melissa Reedy: Any time you have an author’s name you need a date of the publication or use n.d. if no date is available
This article main focus is to improve the nursing and prepared the nurses to develop strategies’ and make intervention by providing the knowledge to the staff in order e to prevent the fall in the older adults. Purpose of the study is to find the connection between if nurse provide the education and use the exercise strategies how is the fall reduction happened in the staff. The goal of the study is assessing the results between the aerobic exercise and practice exercise in the models to reducing the fall and related injuries in the long-term care facilities. Research question was Is there any exercise is making any difference in the fall number and fall related injuries after giving the education about the exercise to the older population in the long-term care facilities? Comment by Melissa Reedy: The main focus of this article Comment by Melissa Reedy: Delete this e
Article supporting the selected issues Comment by Melissa Reedy: Capitalize your words as this is a title
PICOT Question: In a patient older population with memory problems (P) what is the effect of the strategies’ and intervention(i) in comparison to the different interventions(c) in promote their health and wellness is coming 6th months (T)? Comment by Melissa Reedy: You need to state what your intervention actually is
Older adult is very prone to the falls and get injuries from the fall which can lead to more serious condition and rare cases death. Falls occur because of the long-term diseases and less confidence and long hospitalization.as i worked in the long term for one year and most of the population Is prone to the have fall because of their age and their health condition due to that expectation from nurse to use evidenced based practice and intervention to manage falls in the long-term care facilities in the older population. Older population is naturally deal with the memory problems which make them prone to the falls. Albert non-randomized article can be used to reduce the falls among the older adults. Albert work Is checking the effectiveness of the using the exercise strategies in the older population. secondly the effectiveness of the intervention that is connect with the exercise and use with the non-randomized trial to evaluate its effectiveness the fall reduction with in 1 year. Third to comparison between the different studies and all the intervention took for improve this issue. fourthly. This research gave the answer of the PICOT question by all the time and duration of the use of the intervention and the to improve the quality care. Albert this study conducts for the 6 to 12 months. According to the Albert this study was conduct in the long-term care facilities for the 6 and 8 months. Comment by Melissa Reedy: Are prone Comment by Melissa Reedy: Refrain from using first person
interventions and comparison groups in the articles in PICOT question
the intervention and group are same in the studies which is PICOT question wants to address. Firstly, PICOT question assesses the impact of the strategies’ and intervention promoting the health of the older people. The research and article by Albert and coworker evaluate the non-randomized population and on the other hand Alvarez and co-worker assess the intervention for the fall in the Long-term care facility. All the intervention and groups are used in the PICOT question and article is the same. Comment by Melissa Reedy: Capitalize as you are beginning a sentence
Method of study
In the research studies Albert evaluated the effectiveness of the study which is done for the safety for the older adult population in the state of the Pennsylvania to decrease the number if the older population. There were 2 groups of people they were enrolled in the group for 12 ./’months between 2010 to 2011.third group was enrolled but did not take healthy steps but attend and learn from the work.in the second article by Alvarez.in this study participant enrolled for the five years in privately owned and profit in which they offer independent and in long term care and in this they provide the memory care for the dementia people. Comment by Melissa Reedy: Capitalize
The advantage of this study is non-randomized approach by the research provide the outcome and it helps to comparing the intervention.in this study people identified the goals and study provide by the Alvarez and provide all the insight fullness information about the…
