Collaboration Cafe:
Week 4: Collaboration Cafe: Communication in Project Management (graded)
44 unread replies.44 replies.
Communication in Project Management
Think about all of the stakeholders and colleagues that must be kept up to date on the status of your project. The recipient of your communication may be upstream (higher on the organizational chart), lateral (an equal organizationally), or downstream (i.e. end user) in relation to the project. A student in a prior CGE course compared communication in project management to the five rights of medication administration…we need to give:
- The right person
- The right information
- (via) the right route
- (at) the right time
- (in) the right dose
Identify two people, at two different levels (upstream, lateral, downstream) that you need to communicate with for your project and compare/contrast your communication with them based on each of the five rights of communication.
MSN-ST Collaboration Café
Guidelines and Grading Rubric
Purpose
Within the MSN Specialties Track, you will engage and dialog with classmates in a Collaboration Café discussion assignment. The Collaboration Café is an interactive assignment that encourages meaningful application of course concepts, discussion of nurse-practice issues, and student leadership to prompt continued conversations in order to facilitate achievement of course learning outcomes. In order for students to lead and facilitate discussion within the collaboration café, course instructors will take a less active role in daily posting, but will remain present to monitor the discussion for compliance and to offer clarification.
Due Date:
· For Collaboration Café Assignments that take place during weeks 1 – 7, the due date for the initial posting is Wednesday 11:59 pm MT; the due date for responsive postings is Sunday 11:59 pm MT of the week that corresponds with the assigned collaboration café.
· For Collaboration Café Assignments that take place during week 8, the due date for the initial posting is Wednesday 11:59 pm MT; the due date for responsive postings is Saturday 11:59 pm MT, at the end of week 8.
· Due to the interactive nature of this assignment, all Collaboration Café postings must occur within the week that they are assigned. Late submissions are not permitted for grading.
Total Points Possible: 50 points / 25 points
Assignment Overview
Like the weekly Threaded Discussion, the Collaboration Café opens on the Sunday preceding the start of a designated week, and ends on Sunday at 11:59 pm MT at the end of the designated week (weeks 1-7), and by Saturday at 11:59 pm MT at the end of week 8.
In each Collaboration Café, students are expected to post a minimum of 3 postings, to include the following:
· Initial response
· Response to at least two separate peers on separate days from the initial response
Dialogue must be substantive and collaborative in nature, addressing specific concepts and topics noted in the Collaboration Café question and prompting further discussion among peers.
Scholarly references are not required in the Collaboration Café discussions; however, if the student chooses to submit a reference, APA format must be followed. There may also be times when faculty will have you review a website or article. In cases like these, you must properly cite and reference according to APA to avoid plagiarism.
Faculty may submit any student’s post to Turnitin in order to verify originality of work. Plagiarism will result in a zero for the week. Uncivil comments toward peers or faculty, in any of the posts, will not be tolerated and will result in a zero for the week.
The initial posting must meet the following expectations:
· Addresses the collaboration café question in a thorough, substantive manner.
· Demonstrates application of course concepts.
· Discusses implications for advanced nursing practice.
· Includes correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, syntax, sentence, and paragraph structure.
· If sources are included, APA format for citation and referencing is correctly applied.
The responsive postings must meet the following expectations:
· Responds to 2 separate classmates with substantive dialogue that is collaborative in nature.
· The response postings must occur on a different day from the initial posting.
· Responsive postings ask questions, offer new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice in order to facilitate further discussion.
· Includes correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, syntax, sentence, and paragraph structure.
· If sources are included, APA format for citation and referencing is correctly applied.
Grading Criteria
| Category | Points | % | Description |
| Quality of Initial Posting | 50pt rubric: 25
25pt rubric: 12 |
50% | · Addresses the collaboration café question in a thorough, substantive manner.
· Demonstrates application of course concepts. · Discusses implications for advanced nursing practice. |
| Quality of Responsive Postings | 20
10 |
40% | · Responds to 2 separate classmates with substantive dialogue that is collaborative in nature.
· Each of the 2 postings asks questions, offers new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice in order to facilitate further discussion. |
| Graduate-level Writing Style | 5
3 |
10% | · Postings reflect clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas.
· Postings convey a tone of professionalism and respect. · Correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, syntax, sentence, and paragraph structure is evident. · If sources are included, correct APA format for citation and referencing is applied. · No direct quotes are used in this assignment. |
| Timeliness of Participation | The following participation guidelines are expected:
· Initial posting in response to the Collaboration Café questions is posted by Wednesday 11:59 pm MT. · Minimum of two responsive posts to peers are posted by Sunday 11:59 pm MT (weeks 1-7); or by Saturday 11:59 pm MT (week 8). Responsive posts must be on a separate day from the initial post. If either of the above requirements are not met, 10 points shall be deducted / 5 points shall be deducted. |
||
| Total | 50/25 | 100% | A quality assignment will meet all of the above requirements. |
MSN-ST Collaboration Café September 2019
Grading Rubric
| Assignment Criteria | Distinguished
(100%) |
Exceeds
(92%) |
Proficient
(84%) |
Needs Improvement
(0) |
| Quality of Initial Posting | 50pt rubric: 25
25pt rubric: 12 |
23
11 |
21
10 |
0
0 |
| Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by comprehensive content, fully meeting all of the following:
· Addresses the collaboration café question in a thorough, substantive manner. · Demonstrates application of course concepts. · Discusses implications for advanced nursing practice. |
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most items fully met, but one item that is covered in a superficial manner:
· Addresses the collaboration café question in a thorough, substantive manner. · Demonstrates application of course concepts. · Discusses implications for advanced nursing practice. |
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by two items that are covered in a limited or superficial manner:
· Addresses the collaboration café question in a thorough, substantive manner. · Demonstrates application of course concepts. · Discusses implications for advanced nursing practice. |
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more areas:
· Addresses the collaboration café question in a thorough, substantive manner. · Demonstrates application of course concepts. · Discusses implications for advanced nursing practice. |
|
| Quality of Responsive Postings | 50pt rubric: 20
25pt rubric: 10 |
18
9 |
16
8 |
0
0 |
| Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by comprehensive content, fully meeting all of the following:
· Responds to 2 separate classmates with substantive dialogue that is collaborative in nature. · Each of the 2 postings asks questions, offers new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice in order to facilitate further discussion. |
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most items fully met, but one item that is covered in a superficial manner:
· Responds to 2 separate classmates with substantive dialogue that is collaborative in nature. · Each of the 2 postings asks questions, offers new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice in order to facilitate further discussion. |
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by two items that are covered in a limited or superficial manner:
· Responds to 2 separate classmates with substantive dialogue that is collaborative in nature. · Each of the 2 postings asks questions, offers new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice in order to facilitate further discussion. |
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more areas:
· Responds to 2 separate classmates with substantive dialogue that is collaborative in nature. · Each of the 2 postings asks questions, offers new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice in order to facilitate further discussion. |
|
| Graduate-level Writing Style | 50pt rubric: 5
25pt rubric: 3 |
4
2 |
3
1 |
0
0 |
| There are no errors, meeting all requirements noted below:
· Postings reflect clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas. · Postings convey a tone of professionalism and respect. · Correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, syntax, sentence, and paragraph structure is evident. · When sources are included, correct APA format for citation and referencing is applied. · No direct quotes are used in this assignment. |
There are 1-2 errors in the requirements noted below:
· Postings reflect clarity, organization, and logical flow of… |
