Assessing leadership – Savvy Essay Writers | savvyessaywriters.net
Assessing leadership – Savvy Essay Writers | savvyessaywriters.net
Leadership Self-Assessment Paper
Scan the Northouse text. You will note Chapters 2 through 16 explore multiple approaches to the study of leadership. Each chapter represents a leadership theory. Identify three theories of leadership from these chapters and complete the questionnaire at the end of your selected chapters. Develop your formal paper by using the elements of the Leadership Self-Assessment Outline as the headings for your paper (see grading rubric). The content within each of the headings should address all of the elements outlined in each section. The paper should be three pages in length, excluding the cover page and reference page (not to exceed 4 pages – maximum points will be deducted for exceeding 4 pages, refer to grading rubric). See the Course Schedule for the assignment deadline.
Leadership Self-Assessment Paper Outline
I. Introductory Paragraph
A. Identify three theories presented in the Northouse text (each chapter represents one leadership theory) that you decided to use to evaluate yourself.
B. Explain why you chose the three theories.
II. First Leadership Theory
A. Succinctly discuss the primary concepts of your first selected leadership theory.
B. Describe your results (be specific) from taking the test/questionnaire associated with your first selected theory. Share what the score interpretation reflects about your scores.
C. Discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement that you discovered in your leadership style based on taking the test/questionnaire associated with the first theory you chose to evaluate yourself.
III. Second Leadership Theory
A. Succinctly discuss the primary concepts of your second selected leadership theory.
B. Describe your results (be specific) from taking the test/questionnaire associated with your second selected theory. Share what the score interpretation reflects about your scores.
C. Discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement that you discovered in your leadership style based on taking the test/questionnaire associated with the second theory you chose to evaluate yourself.
IV. Third Leadership Theory
A. Succinctly discuss the primary concepts of your third selected leadership theory.
B. Describe your results (be specific) from taking the test/questionnaire associated with your third selected theory. Share what the score interpretation reflects about your scores.
C. Discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement that you discovered in your leadership style based on taking the test/questionnaire associated with the third theory you chose to evaluate yourself.
V. Conclusion – summarizing paragraph
VI. Reference Page
PLAGIARISM:
Plagiarism is considered cheating and is a violation of academic integrity as outlined in the Student Handbook. Any student who plagiarizes any portion of the assignment may receive a grade of zero on the assignment.
LATE ASSIGNMENTS:
Unless prior faculty notification and negotiation of an extended deadline, ten points will be deducted per day if submitted late. Assignment will not be accepted if submitted more than 3 days late and assigned grade will be 0 (zero).
4344 Leadership Self Assessment Grading Rubric.pdf Preview the document
Rubric
4344 Leadership Self-Assessment Grading Rubric
4344 Leadership Self-Assessment Grading Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: Introductory Paragraph
Identify what three theories (from the Northouse text) you decided to use to evaluate yourself. Explain why you chose these three theories.
5.0 pts
Exemplary
Introduction section exceeds meeting stated objectives as evidenced by: – three theories identified – explanation of why these theories were chosen
4.0 pts
Proficient
Introduction section meets stated objectives with accurate and relevant information related to: – three theories identified – explanation of why these three theories were chosen
3.0 pts
Competent
Introduction section minimally meets objectives as evidenced by three theories identified, but no explanation given for selecting theories.
2.0 pts
Substantial Areas for Improvement
Introduction section meets objectives with only one or two theories identified and explanation for choosing the selected theories.
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No introductory paragraph found in paper.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: Theory 1 Primary Concepts
Explain the primary concepts of your first selected theory
5.0 pts
Exemplary
Primary concepts of the first selected theory exceeds objectives with clear and concise explanation and description of the primary concepts.
4.0 pts
Proficient
Primary concepts of the first selected theory meet stated objectives.
3.0 pts
Competent
Primary concepts of the first selected theory minimally meet objectives. Concepts are partially defined and explained.
2.0 pts
Substantial Areas for Improvement
Primary concepts of the first selected theory do not meet objectives.
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Primary concepts of the first selected theory are not found in paper.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: Theory 1 Discussion of Results
Describe your results (be specific) from taking the test/questionnaire associated with your first selected theory. Share what the score interpretation reflects about your scores.
7.0 pts
Expemplary
Discussion of results exceeds objectives with clear and concise description of: – the theory measurement tool – results of theory questionnaire – the score interpretation of your answers
6.0 pts
Proficient
Discussion of results meets objectives with description of: – the theory measurement tool – results of theory questionnaire – the score interpretation of your answers
5.0 pts
Competent
Discussion of results meets objectives with minimal or absent description of: – the theory measurement tool – results of theory questionnaire – the score interpretation of your answers
4.0 pts
Substantial Areas for Improvement
Discussion of results does not meet objectives with minimal or absent description of: – the theory measurement tool – results of theory questionnaire – the score interpretation of your answers
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Discussion of results of the following are missing from the paper: – the theory measurement tool – results of theory questionnaire – the score interpretation of your answers
7.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: Theory 1 Strengths, Weaknesses, and Opportunities for Improvement
Discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement that you discovered in your leadership style based on taking the test/questionnaire associated with the first theory you chose to evaluate yourself.
6.0 pts
Expemplary
Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section exceeds stated objectives with clear and concise discussion of: – strengths discovered in your personal leadership style – weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style – opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style
5.0 pts
Proficient
Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section meets stated objectives with discussion of: – strengths discovered in your personal leadership style – weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style – opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style
4.0 pts
Competent
Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section includes minimal or absent information in relation to 1 of the 3 areas: – strengths discovered in your personal leadership style – weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style – opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style.
3.0 pts
Substantial Areas for Improvement
Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section does not meet objectives with minimal or absent information in 2 of the 3 areas: – strengths discovered in your personal leadership style – weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style – opportunities for personal improvement discovered in leadership style
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section not found in paper.
6.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: Theory 2 Primary Concepts
Explain the primary concepts of your first selected theory
5.0 pts
Exemplary
Primary concepts of the second selected theory exceeds objectives with clear and concise explanation and description of the primary concepts.
4.0 pts
Proficient
Primary concepts of the second selected theory meet stated objectives.
3.0 pts
Competent
Primary concepts of the second selected theory minimally meet objectives. Concepts are partially defined and explained.
2.0 pts
Substantial Areas for Improvement
Primary concepts of the second selected theory do not meet objectives.
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Primary concepts of the second selected theory are not found in paper.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: Theory 2 Discussion of Results
Describe your results (be specific) from taking the test/questionnaire associated with your second selected theory. Share what the score interpretation reflects about your scores.
7.0 pts
Exemplary
Discussion of results exceeds objectives with clear and concise description of: – the theory measurement tool – results of theory questionnaire – the score interpretation of your answers
6.0 pts
Proficient
Discussion of results meets objectives with description of: – the theory measurement tool – results of theory questionnaire – the score interpretation of your answers
5.0 pts
Competent
Discussion of results meets objectives with minimal or absent description of: –…
