DATA-BACKUP-DISASTER-RECOVERY-computer-science-homework-help
DATA-BACKUP-DISASTER-RECOVERY-computer-science-homework-help
Data Backup/ Disaster Recovery
Define, describe and identify the elements of (a) good Data Backup Planning, (b) good Disaster Recovery Planning, and (c) good Business Continuity Planning. Be sure to identify and describe any interdependencies in the planning.
The paper must following the formatting guidelines in The Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2010), (6th ed., 7th printing), and contain a title page, five scholarly references, Six pages of content, and a reference page. More APA assistance can be found at the Purdue University Online Writing Lab.
No Plagiarism
APA format
The rubric is given in below. Plz follow that
Rubric Detail
| Unsatisfactory | Emerging/Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | Excellent | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge of Content |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 11.68 (11.68%) Work/participation does not reflect the assignment purpose |
Points Range:11.84 (11.84%) – 13.12 (13.12%) Work/participation marginally reflects the assignment purpose |
Points Range:13.28 (13.28%) – 14.08 (14.08%) Work /participation reflects the assignment purpose |
Points Range:14.24 (14.24%) – 15.04 (15.04%) Work /participation is accurately detailed |
Points Range:15.2 (15.2%) – 16 (16%) Work /participation stands-out as exemplary and is accurately detailed |
| Knowledge of Content |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 12.41 (12.41%) Skill in gathering, storing & retrieving data is inferior. |
Points Range:12.58 (12.58%) – 13.94 (13.94%) Skill in gathering, storing & retrieving data is elementary, requires significant assistance |
Points Range:14.11 (14.11%) – 14.96 (14.96%) Skill in gathering, storing & retrieving data is acceptable, requires average assistance |
Points Range:15.13 (15.13%) – 15.98 (15.98%) Skill in gathering, storing & retrieving data is accomplished, requires little to no assistance |
Points Range:16.15 (16.15%) – 17 (17%) Skill in gathering, storing & retrieving data is highly evolved |
| Knowledge of Content |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 12.41 (12.41%) Ineffective documentation of research/support |
Points Range:12.58 (12.58%) – 13.94 (13.94%) Uses minimum ref(s) to support research with poor integration |
Points Range:14.11 (14.11%) – 14.96 (14.96%) Uses adequate ref(s) to support research with acceptable integration |
Points Range:15.13 (15.13%) – 15.98 (15.98%) Uses adequate ref(s) and integrates them well |
Points Range:16.15 (16.15%) – 17 (17%) Uses a thorough # of ref(s) and integrates them clearly and concisely |
| Critical Thinking |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 10.95 (10.95%) Fails to compare/contrast and/or evaluate information |
Points Range:11.1 (11.1%) – 12.3 (12.3%) Comparing/contrasting and/or evaluating information is at an elementary level |
Points Range:12.45 (12.45%) – 13.2 (13.2%) Comparing/contrasting and/or evaluating information is accomplished at an acceptable level |
Points Range:13.35 (13.35%) – 14.1 (14.1%) Is able to effectively compare/contrast and/or evaluate information |
Points Range:14.25 (14.25%) – 15 (15%) Integration of information is well analyzed, interpreted, and documented to meet research objectives |
| Critical Thinking |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 10.95 (10.95%) Does not discuss or defines other relationships, systems, or subsystems |
Points Range:11.1 (11.1%) – 12.3 (12.3%) Discuss or defines other relationships, systems, or subsystems |
Points Range:12.45 (12.45%) – 13.2 (13.2%) Discuss or defines other systems or subsystems and begins to identify relationships |
Points Range:13.35 (13.35%) – 14.1 (14.1%) Defines other systems or subsystems and can accurately identify relationships |
Points Range:14.25 (14.25%) – 15 (15%) Graphically defines other systems or subsystems and can accurately identify relationships |
| Written |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 4.38 (4.38%) Sentences are not well-constructed and often lack clarity. Formats and patterns are repetitive |
Points Range:4.44 (4.44%) – 4.92 (4.92%) Sentences are somewhat clear and well constructed, but lack variety in format & length |
Points Range:4.98 (4.98%) – 5.28 (5.28%) Most sentences are clear and well-constructed- Some evidence of variety in format, length, and complexity. |
Points Range:5.34 (5.34%) – 5.64 (5.64%) Sentences are clear and well-constructed – Some evidence of variety in format, length, and complexity |
Points Range:5.7 (5.7%) – 6 (6%) Sentences are clear and well-constructed – Evidence of variety in format, length, and complexity |
| Written |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 5.11 (5.11%) Paper is riddled with spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors |
Points Range:5.18 (5.18%) – 5.74 (5.74%) Paper contains 5 or 6 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors |
Points Range:5.81 (5.81%) – 6.16 (6.16%) Paper contains 3 or 4 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors |
Points Range:6.23 (6.23%) – 6.58 (6.58%) Paper contains 1 or 2 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors |
Points Range:6.65 (6.65%) – 7 (7%) No spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors are readily apparent |
| Written |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 5.11 (5.11%) Paper is riddled with APA errors |
Points Range:5.18 (5.18%) – 5.74 (5.74%) Paper contains 5 or 6 APA errors |
Points Range:5.81 (5.81%) – 6.16 (6.16%) Paper contains 3 or 4 APA errors |
Points Range:6.23 (6.23%) – 6.58 (6.58%) Paper contains 1 or 2 APA errors |
Points Range:6.65 (6.65%) – 7 (7%) No APA errors are readily apparent |
