Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation Of Process
Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process
In 500-750 words, develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project. Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:
Describe the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data.
Describe the ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved.
Describe how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence. Address validity, reliability, and applicability.
Describe strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results.
Describe implications for practice and future research.
You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Note: After submitting the assignment, you will receive feedback from the instructor. Use this feedback to make revisions for your final paper submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.Rubic_Print_Format
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NUR-590 NUR-590-O500 Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section E: Implementation Plan 100.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) Satisfactory (88.00%) Good (92.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 70.0%
Setting and Access to Potential Subjects 5.0% A description of setting and access to potential subjects is not included. A description of setting and access to potential subjects is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of setting and access to potential subjects is present. A description of setting and access to potential subjects is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive description of setting and access to potential subjects is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Amount of Time Needed to Complete This Project 5.0% A description of the amount of time needed to complete this project is not included. A description of the amount of time needed to complete this project is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of the amount of time needed to complete this project is present. A description of the amount of time needed to complete this project is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive description of the amount of time needed to complete this project is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Resources or Changes Needed in the Implementation of the Solution 10.0% A description of the resources or changes needed in the implementation of the solution is not included. A description of the resources or changes needed in the implementation of the solution is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of the resources or changes needed in the implementation of the solution is present. A description of the resources or changes needed in the implementation of the solution is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive description of the resources or changes needed in the implementation of the solution is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Methods And Instruments 10.0% A description of methods and instruments is not included. A description of methods and instruments is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of methods and instruments is present. A description of methods and instruments is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive description of methods and instruments is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Process for Delivering the Intervention Solution 10.0% A description of the process for delivering the intervention solution is not included. A description of the process for delivering the intervention solution is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of the process for delivering the intervention solution is present. A description of the process for delivering the intervention solution is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive description of the process for delivering the intervention solution is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Data Collection, Including Data Management and Analysis Processes 5.0% A description of data collection, including data management and analysis processes, is not included. A description of data collection, including data management and analysis processes, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of data collection, including data management and analysis processes, is present. A description of data collection, including data management and analysis processes, is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive description of data collection, including data management and analysis processes, is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Strategies to Deal With the Management of Any Barriers, Facilitators, and Challenges 5.0% A description of strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges is not included. A description of strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges is present. A description of strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive description of strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Feasibility of the Implementation Plan 5.0% A description of the feasibility of the implementation plan is not included. A description of the feasibility of the implementation plan is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of the feasibility of the implementation plan is present. A description of the feasibility of the implementation plan is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive description the feasibility of the implementation plan is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue a Proposed Solution After Implementation 10.0% A description of plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation is not included. A description of plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation is present. A description of plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive description of plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Required Sources 5.0% Sources are not included. Number of required sources is only partially met. Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors,…
