Health Promotion (Reply Posts) – Savvy Essay Writers | savvyessaywriters.net
Health Promotion (Reply Posts) – Savvy Essay Writers | savvyessaywriters.net
REPLY POSTS:
Reply separately to two of your classmates posts (See attached classmates posts, post#1 and post#2).
When replying to your peers, think about the ethical considerations related to research or working with a vulnerable population. Although the vulnerable share characteristics making them susceptible to health concerns, they remain unique.
In the initial post (see attachment, mine was about “combat veterans”), everyone discussed both strengths and weaknesses inherent to a specific vulnerable population.
What steps would you recommend to ensure that your peer’s vulnerable group is ethically protected throughout the research as well as the participation element of a community-based participatory research project; that is, shelter services, food banks, case management, support groups, etc.?
– Use at least two scholarly references per peer post. In your reply posts, include how the information you learned from your peer’s post will help you to provide care to a patient as a Nurse Practitioner.
Note: The expectation is not that you “agree” or “disagree” with your peers but that you develop a conversation with information that is validated via citations to encourage learning and to bring your own perspective to the conversation.
Please, send me the two documents separately, for example one is the reply to my peers Post #1, and the other one is the reply to my other peer Post #2.
Please, keep in mind these are replies.
TURNITIN ASSIGNMENT (FREE OF PLAGIARISM)
Note: My background for you to have as a reference: I am currently enrolled in the Psych Mental Health Practitioner Program, I am a Registered Nurse, I work at a Psychiatric Hospital, where I also work with this vulnerable population.
Running head: HEALTH PROMOTION 1
HEALTH PROMOTION 2
Community-Based Participatory Care to Combat Veterans
Student’s name
Institution affiliation
Combat veterans are a vulnerable group that serves the military in combat zones. This kind of group experiences a lot of challenges when serving, including mental health issues. Even after their services and after returning to their homes, they experience a lot of problems, such as struggling to meet their needs (Westphal& Convoy, 2015). When in service, it means that you are separated from family members, which is often stressful. Mental health problems such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is caused by stress. Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) is an approach used to conduct research involving members of the community. The CBPR project can help identify some of the problems faced by this group. This paper discusses the cons and pros of implementing a Community-Based Participatory Research health promotion project with combat veterans.
Through the implementation of the Community-Based Participatory Research health promotion project, the veteran group can primarily benefit because most healthcare practitioners are willing to collaborate. Nurses who initiate and implement health promotion plans try to work within the cultural context with the involved vulnerable group (Johnson &Koocher, 2017). The practitioners try much to develop and work out plans to engage the combat veterans. Though most of these veterans may seem uninterested, healthcare personnel can understand, recognize, and assess this vulnerable group’s importance, thus instigating health promotion plans and services also aimed to support military family wellbeing.
The CBPR health project is aimed at collecting research to improve the lives of different vulnerable groups. An advantage of this research project includes exploring perceptions as well as overall knowledge from the combat veterans. CBPR joins with the community to make a comprehensive research of a vulnerable group, to minimize disparities. As stated above, this group is exposed to a lot of health problems that need attention. With the American generation influenced and defined by military war, more combat veterans qualify for VHA, but fewer are enrolled (Johnson &Koocher, 2017). Healthcare practitioners have no straight impact on combat veterans’ maintenance and care. The purpose of the health promotion plan is to address the needs of this vulnerable group because it’s a fact that half of their lives are usually at risk.
Flexibility and awareness are some of the cons of implementing CBPR. As their health lives include more downs than ups, it’s better to know the limits of combat veterans and self-awareness. Some of the things that are likely to make a combat veteran not wanting to participate in this kind of project are the fact that many of them suffer from physical disabilities, like being on a wheelchair due to war injuries, while others are experiencing brain injuries, sprains and strains and so on (Westphal& Convoy, 2015).
Ethical issues can serve as barriers, or cons of implementing the CBPR project. Reason being that combat veterans are mindful of ethical implications. Confidentiality is a factor that this group doesn’t want to endanger, so they stay tight and hold up information. Combat veterans’ ethical practices (personal and professional) are liable on actual submission of private and cultural scruples as well as professional rules (Oster et al. 2019). They are not allowed to share any information outside their job areas, so implementing the health promotion plan to people who often and hardly share information based on their workplaces is hard. Culture can also serve as a con because not every person or combat veteran exhibits cultural beliefs and behavior characteristics.
References
Johnson, W. B., &Koocher, G. P. (2017). Ethical issues in the treatment of suicidal military personnel and veterans. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-30847-011
Oster, C., Lawn, S., & Waddell, E. (2019). Delivering services to the families of Veterans of current conflicts: a rapid review of outcomes for Veterans. Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health, 5(2), 159-175. Retrieved from https://jmvfh.utpjournals.press/doi/abs/10.3138/jmvfh.2018-0011
Westphal, R., & Convoy, S. (2015). Military culture implications for mental health and nursing care. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 20(1), 47-54. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b7da/7677a4a05cccf93995e2f704a1263a0c2af8.pdf
POST #1 JENIFER
The purpose of this discussion is to weigh the pros and cons of the implementation of a Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) health promotion project with the homeless adolescent and young adult vulnerable population. Also, this discussion will consider the benefits of the actions of this vulnerable population in a CBPR health promotion project and how their active role is important. Lastly, this discussion post will examine this vulnerable population’s health disparities and health inequities on the ability of a program to be successful.
Homeless adolescents and young adults depend on shelters, food banks, and community clinics as their health assets to optimize their health. Schooling, which includes nurses, free meals, shelter, and education, can increase this vulnerable population’s health promotion. This vulnerable population’s health problems start with the lack of basic needs such as food, shelter, and health education. This sets this population up to fail at health promotion. Unfortunately, as Podschun (1993) and Woan et al. (2013) discuss in their studies, this population’s health problems also stem from risky behaviors such as drug use, needle sharing, decreased condom use, and increased number of sexual partners. The risky behaviors accompanied by limited available access to health care leaves this population at risk for disease, illness, and unhealthy habits. This population can not access health care due to cost, feeling judged, having a lack of trust with providers, and not having time off from work to seek care (Woan et al., 2013). Podschun (1993) reviewed multiple studies that confirmed this vulnerable population engaged in risky behaviors that set themselves up for health problems such as HIV. However, even with lack of education, lack of healthcare and increased risks of developing diseases, homeless adolescents and young adults are resilient. They learn to live with minimum resources, become empowered to heal with the least amount of resources, and learn from other teen homeless role models on how to live their best health promoting life. Teen outreach programs provide a means to improve the homeless adolescent and young adult’s lives. These programs provide resources, education, and interventions to increase this vulnerable population’s health promotion and disease prevention.
The CBPR is one way to promote and increase health promotion in this vulnerable population’s community. This research method includes participants from this vulnerable community to have a voice in the needed social changes in their community. The goal of these changes is to increase health promotion, empower, and increase knowledge in this vulnerable population. As Pender et al., (2015) states, CBPR will only be successful if through community analysis, the community must be thoroughly involved. This type of research will fail if it does not include the community’s input. Wallerstein and Duran (2010) discuss that CBPR will be most successful if the community members decide on the intervention, the community members are valued, the community’s cultural values and beliefs are respected, and there is a concrete plan when grant funding ends.
As we consider the implementation of a Community-Based Participatory Research health promotion project with the homeless adolescents and young adults, as future Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs), we must examine the pros and cons. The homeless adolescents and young adults have shown empowerment, motivation, and continued support through teen outreach programs. The “Teen Peer Outreach-Street Work Project” is one…
