health psychology annotated bibliography

Health Psychology Annotated Bibliography

Instructions and Grading Rubric

Please find three (3) journal articles related to health psychology to comprise an annotated bibliography that includes three annotations. Information and instructions for completing annotated bibliographies, along with examples, are contained in a document published by Purdue OWLPreview the document. Please note the following when completing your annotations:

  1. You must use APA style
  2. You must include three (3) annotations (one annotation per journal article)
    1. All annotations must be from scientific journals
    2. Your annotations must be research articles (i.e., describe an original research study).
    3. Your annotations must reflect articles published within the past ten years.
    4. You must include the articles with your submission
  3. Your annotations must summarize, assess, and reflect (see Purdue OWL document)
  4. Your annotated bibliography must be typed and double-spaced with one-inch margins
  5. While there is no specific page limit on each annotation, the annotations must fully meet each rubric requirement. Full credit will only be awarded for thoughtful and accurate responses. (1-2 pages per annotation are usually an indication of a well-considered response.)
  6. Your annotated bibliography is due no later than Sunday, July 7, 2019.
Video resources to help polish your annotation skills. These are highly recommended viewing. They are short (3-9 min) but powerful.
Play media comment. Play media comment.
Play media comment. Play media comment.

Grading Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Annotation 1:APA style citation

Full Marks = APA citation with < 3 errors

0.1 pts

No Marks= not APA style or 3 + errors

0.0 pts

0.1 pts

Annotation 1: From scientific journal

Full Marks = Article from a scientific journal

0.1 pts

No Marks = Article from any other source

0.0 pts

0.1 pts

Annotation 1: Current (within 10 years)

Full Marks = Article published within 10 years

0.1 pts

No Marks = Article not within 10 years

0.0 pts

0.1 pts

Annotation 1: Summarizes

Full Marks = Annotation includes accurate and comprehensive, yet succinct, summary that describes the purpose of the article and the findings

1.0 pts

.6 credit = Annotation is lacking important details or contains inaccuracies in its summary

0.6 pts

.3 credit = Annotation does not accurately describe the purpose of the article and/or the findings

0.3 pts

No Marks = Summary not included or is plagiarized

0.0 pts

1.0 pts

Annotation 1: Assesses

Full Marks = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article including answers to at three of the following questions: Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source?

1.0 pts

.6 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only two of the questions outlined above.

0.6 pts

.3 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only one of the questions outlined above.

0.3 pts

No Marks = Annotation does not include an evaluation of the article.

0.0 pts

1.0 pts

Annotation 1: Reflects

Full Marks = Annotation includes reflection including answers to all three of the following questions: How does the article fit into your overall research on the topic? Was this source helpful to you with regard to increasing your understanding of the topic? How did the source confirm or change how you think about the topic?

1.0 pts

.6 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least two of the questions outlined above.

0.6 pts

.3 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least one of the questions outlined above.

0.3 pts

No Marks = Annotation does not include reflection.

0.0 pts

1.0 pts

Annotation 2: APA style citation

Full Marks = APA citation with < 3 errors

0.1 pts

No Marks= not APA style or 3 + errors

0.0 pts

0.1 pts

Annotation 2: From scientific journal

Full Marks = Article from a scientific journal

0.1 pts

No Marks = Article from any other source

0.0 pts

0.1 pts

Annotation 2: Current (within 10 years)

Full Marks = Article published within 10 years

0.1 pts

No Marks = Article not within 10 years

0.0 pts

0.1 pts

Annotation 2: Summarizes

Full Marks = Annotation includes accurate and comprehensive, yet succinct, summary that describes the purpose of the article and the findings

1.0 pts

.6 credit = Annotation is lacking important details or contains inaccuracies in its summary

0.6 pts

.3 credit = Annotation does not accurately describe the purpose of the article and/or the findings

0.3 pts

No Marks = Summary not included or is plagiarized

0.0 pts

1.0 pts

Annotation 2: Assesses

Full Marks = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article including answers to at three of the following questions: Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source?

1.0 pts

.6 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only two of the questions outlined above.

0.6 pts

.3 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only one of the questions outlined above.

0.3 pts

No Marks = Annotation does not include an evaluation of the article.

0.0 pts

1.0 pts

Annotation 2: Reflects

Full Marks = Annotation includes reflection including answers to all three of the following questions: How does the article fit into your overall research on the topic? Was this source helpful to you with regard to increasing your understanding of the topic? How did the source confirm or change how you think about the topic?

1.0 pts

.6 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least two of the questions outlined above.

0.6 pts

.3 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least one of the questions outlined above.

0.3 pts

No Marks = Annotation does not include reflection.

0.0 pts

1.0 pts

Annotation 3: APA style citation

Full Marks = APA citation with no errors

0.2 pts

.1 credit = APA style citation with 1-2 errors

0.1 pts

No Marks= not APA style or 3 + errors

0.0 pts

0.2 pts

Annotation 3: From scientific journal

Full Marks = Article from a scientific journal

0.1 pts

No Marks = Article from any other source

0.0 pts

0.1 pts

Annotation 3: Current (within 10 years)

Full Marks = Article published within 10 years

0.1 pts

No Marks = Article not within 10 years

0.0 pts

0.1 pts

Annotation 3: Summarizes

Full Marks = Annotation includes accurate and comprehensive, yet succinct, summary that describes the purpose of the article and the findings

1.0 pts

.6 credit = Annotation is lacking important details or contains inaccuracies in its summary

0.6 pts

.3 credit = Annotation does not accurately describe the purpose of the article and/or the findings

0.3 pts

No Marks = Summary not included or is plagiarized

0.0 pts

1.0 pts

Annotation 3: Assesses

Full Marks = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article including answers to at three of the following questions: Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source?

1.0 pts

.6 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only two of the questions outlined above.

0.6 pts

.3 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only one of the questions outlined above.

0.3 pts

No Marks = Annotation does not include an evaluation of the article.

0.0 pts

1.0 pts

Annotation 3: Reflects

Full Marks = Annotation includes reflection including answers to all three of the following questions: How does the article fit into your overall research on the topic? Was this source helpful to you with regard to increasing your understanding of the topic? How did the source confirm or change how you think about the topic?

1.0 pts

.6 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least two of the questions outlined above.

0.6 pts

.3 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least one of the questions outlined above.

0.3 pts

No Marks = Annotation does not include reflection.

0.0 pts

1.0 pts

Total Points: 10.0

Rubric

Annotated Bibliography

Annotated Bibliography
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 1:APA style citation
0.1 pts

Full Marks = APA citation with < 3 errors

 0.0 pts

No Marks= not APA style or 3 + errors

0.1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 1: From scientific journal
0.1 pts

Full Marks = Article from a scientific journal

 0.0 pts

No Marks = Article from any other source

0.1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 1: Current (within 10 years)
0.1 pts

Full Marks = Article published within 10 years

 0.0 pts

No Marks = Article not within 10 years

0.1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 1: Summarizes
1.0 pts

Full Marks = Annotation includes accurate and comprehensive, yet succinct, summary that describes the purpose of the article and the findings

 0.6 pts

.6 credit = Annotation is lacking important details or contains inaccuracies in its summary

 0.3 pts

.3 credit = Annotation does not accurately describe the purpose of the article and/or the findings

 0.0 pts

No Marks = Summary not included or is plagiarized

1.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 1: Assesses
1.0 pts

Full Marks = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article including answers to at three of the following questions: Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source?

 0.6 pts

.6 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only two of the questions outlined above.

 0.3 pts

.3 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only one of the questions outlined above.

 0.0 pts

No Marks = Annotation does not include an evaluation of the article.

1.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 1: Reflects
1.0 pts

Full Marks = Annotation includes reflection including answers to all three of the following questions: How does the article fit into your overall research on the topic? Was this source helpful to you with regard to increasing your understanding of the topic? How did the source confirm or change how you think about the topic?

 0.6 pts

.6 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least two of the questions outlined above.

 0.3 pts

.3 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least one of the questions outlined above.

 0.0 pts

No Marks = Annotation does not include reflection.

1.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 2: APA style citation
0.1 pts

Full Marks = APA citation with < 3 errors

 0.0 pts

No Marks= not APA style or 3 + errors

0.1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 2: From scientific journal
0.1 pts

Full Marks = Article from a scientific journal

 0.0 pts

No Marks = Article from any other source

0.1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 2: Current (within 10 years)
0.1 pts

Full Marks = Article published within 10 years

 0.0 pts

No Marks = Article not within 10 years

0.1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 2: Summarizes
1.0 pts

Full Marks = Annotation includes accurate and comprehensive, yet succinct, summary that describes the purpose of the article and the findings

 0.6 pts

.6 credit = Annotation is lacking important details or contains inaccuracies in its summary

 0.3 pts

.3 credit = Annotation does not accurately describe the purpose of the article and/or the findings

 0.0 pts

No Marks = Summary not included or is plagiarized

1.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 2: Assesses
1.0 pts

Full Marks = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article including answers to at three of the following questions: Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source?

 0.6 pts

.6 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only two of the questions outlined above.

 0.3 pts

.3 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only one of the questions outlined above.

 0.0 pts

No Marks = Annotation does not include an evaluation of the article.

1.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 2: Reflects
1.0 pts

Full Marks = Annotation includes reflection including answers to all three of the following questions: How does the article fit into your overall research on the topic? Was this source helpful to you with regard to increasing your understanding of the topic? How did the source confirm or change how you think about the topic?

 0.6 pts

.6 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least two of the questions outlined above.

 0.3 pts

.3 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least one of the questions outlined above.

 0.0 pts

No Marks = Annotation does not include reflection.

1.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 3: APA style citation
0.2 pts

Full Marks = APA citation with no errors

 0.1 pts

.1 credit = APA style citation with 1-2 errors

 0.0 pts

No Marks= not APA style or 3 + errors

0.2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 3: From scientific journal
0.1 pts

Full Marks = Article from a scientific journal

 0.0 pts

No Marks = Article from any other source

0.1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 3: Current (within 10 years)
0.1 pts

Full Marks = Article published within 10 years

 0.0 pts

No Marks = Article not within 10 years

0.1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 3: Summarizes
1.0 pts

Full Marks = Annotation includes accurate and comprehensive, yet succinct, summary that describes the purpose of the article and the findings

 0.6 pts

.6 credit = Annotation is lacking important details or contains inaccuracies in its summary

 0.3 pts

.3 credit = Annotation does not accurately describe the purpose of the article and/or the findings

 0.0 pts

No Marks = Summary not included or is plagiarized

1.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 3: Assesses
1.0 pts

Full Marks = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article including answers to at three of the following questions: Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source?

 0.6 pts

.6 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only two of the questions outlined above.

 <span clas

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient”for a 15% Discount!”


Buy Custom Nursing Papers

The post health psychology annotated bibliography appeared first on Student Homeworks.

#write essay #research paper #blog writing #article writing #academic writer #reflective paper #essay pro #types of essays #write my essay #reflective essay #paper writer #essay writing service #essay writer free #essay helper #write my paper #assignment writer #write my essay for me #write an essay for me #uk essay #thesis writer #dissertation writing services #writing a research paper #academic essay #dissertation help #easy essay #do my essay #paper writing service #buy essay #essay writing help #essay service #dissertation writing #online essay writer #write my paper for me #types of essay writing #essay writing website #write my essay for free #reflective report #type my essay #thesis writing services #write paper for me #research paper writing service #essay paper #professional essay writers #write my essay online #essay help online #write my research paper #dissertation writing help #websites that write papers for you for free #write my essay for me cheap #pay someone to write my paper #pay someone to write my research paper #Essaywriting #Academicwriting #Assignmenthelp #Nursingassignment #Nursinghomework #Psychologyassignment #Physicsassignment #Philosophyassignment #Religionassignment #History #Writing #writingtips #Students #universityassignment #onlinewriting #savvyessaywriters #onlineprowriters #assignmentcollection #excelsiorwriters #writinghub #study #exclusivewritings #myassignmentgeek #expertwriters #art #transcription #grammer #college #highschool #StudentsHelpingStudents #studentshirt #StudentShoe #StudentShoes #studentshoponline #studentshopping #studentshouse #StudentShoutout #studentshowcase2017 #StudentsHub #studentsieuczy #StudentsIn #studentsinberlin #studentsinbusiness #StudentsInDubai #studentsininternational
© Copyright 2026 Savvy Essay Writers Email: support@savvyessaywriters.net or savvyessaywriters@gmail.com
NURSING HOMEWORK DUE TODAYbusiness ethics discussion replies