hot coffee
Humanities
Number your answers
Questions 1-6 are worth 2pts each, 7-8 are worth 4pts each
|
1. What opinion do you have on this topic of tort reform and frivolous lawsuits before watching the film? How did you form this opinion? |
|||
|
2. What is the thesis and who is the primary audience of the proposal the film makes? |
|||
|
3. How fairly does the film use definition/categorical arguments and ethical arguments to bolster its central proposal? |
|||
|
4. Identify any logical fallacies the film used or responded to. |
|||
|
5. How do the different arguments in the film use ethos (authority) to support their argument? |
|||
|
6. How are the arguments supported by VISUAL claims and evidence? How does this benefit from being a documentary instead of an essay? |
|||
|
7. Is the article below a fair criticism of Hot Coffee? Why or why not? What is the most insightful criticism it offers of the film? |
|||
|
8. This article discusses the follow-up to the Jamie Leigh Jones vs KBR case What effect does the outcome of this case have on the argument of Hot Coffee? Why? plegerisem will be checked. |
|||
