i want someone to write this for me 4
For the first question:
Reading: Never Let Me Go, chapter 18-end .. NOTE: I do not have the book
Purpose: To analyze Ishiguro’s social commentary in Never Let Me Go using writing as an exploratory tool
Skills/knowledge practiced: Textual analysis; close reading; writing with citations; use of textual evidence; developing argument; analysis of narrative techniques; genre analysis; following proper MLA formatting guidelines; paraphrasing quotes
Submission instructions: Please submit your 200-400 word response as a Word doc on Blackboard (no paper copies will be accepted) using the link above. Every submission should include at least one quote from the text. Submit no later than 11:59 pm, Tues, 3/31.
1 pt. for proper citation use; 1 pt. for proper assignment formatting.
Assignments should be formatted as follows: 12 pt. font, 1-inch margins, double-spaced with header, page numbers, Times New Roman font, Word Count listed, Works Cited page on separate page, submitted as Microsoft Word or PDF. This may seem like a lot but it is the golden standard for document preparation, and if properly followed will make your writing immediately more consistent and easier to read. See the following for an example: MLA Citation Template and Example.pdf
Option 1: How do the revelations about Hailsham and the clones at the end of Never Let Me Go change your reading of the novel (i.e., that Hailsham was an experiment to give clones humane treatment)? What types of “privileges” do the Hailsham students enjoy in being treated differently than other clones, and how are those privileges subverted at the end of the novel? If we believe the clones are worthy of humane treatment, should Hailsham even exist? Make sure to choose a passage and closely analyze its specific use of language, metaphor, narration, etc. to provide support for your claims.
Option 2: What is the symbolic role of art in the novel in deciding whether clones deserve humane treatment? Miss Emily explains to Kathy and Tommy that “We took away your art [to showcase at the Gallery] because we thought it would reveal your souls. Or to put it more finely, we did it to prove you had souls at all” (260). How can Miss Emily’s suggestion that art could reveal one’s “soul” be reconciled with the fact that clones are presumed not to have souls in the first place?
The second question:
2. Respond to two of the questions below:
1- Recall Ishiguro’s primary concern with love and friendship in the face of mortality. How does the ending support this? What do you think he’s saying about these ideas? How might the the novel be different if the dystopian elements were his first concern?
2- What questions remain unanswered at the end of the book? Why do you think they aren’t answered? Do you have an idea what the answers might be?
3- Were there any surprises for you by the book’s end? What feelings and thoughts did it leave you with?
4- On p273, Tommy states his belief that Miss Lucy was right in wanting to inform the Hailsham children about their purpose and future. Miss Emily has presented the opposite argument, shielding them so that they would at least have enjoyable childhoods. Which choice do you align with and why? Follow your thoughts through to the implications for their adult lives.
5- On p272-3, Kath describes the road the way she imagined the dark roads she traveled versus the major highways. What is significant about the way she described them? Are they symbolic?
6- On o, 269, Madame admits to feeling revulsion at the sight of the Hailsham students. Why, given what we now know about her, might she have felt this?
7- On p215, Kathy says “everything changed again …because of the boat.” To what changes is she referring?
8- Kathy seems to take the news about the deferral rumor in stride. Is this in keeping with her character? Support your answers with examples.
9- On p232, Ruth asks forgiveness for keeping Tommy & Kathay apart. Did she? How?
For the third question you will respond to someone’s post that I will sent it to you
