Lawsuit Recommendation Paper
Write a 750-1,000 word paper in which you explore the options for defending a lawsuit in court, going to arbitration, going to mediation, or structuring a settlement.
Scenario: A neurosurgeon is claiming injury and damages from a for-profit hospital that notified him that it had denied his hospital admitting privileges. The physician claims the hospital used its peer-review process as a veil to deny access to the hospital and his subsequent ability to perform surgeries. Shortly after, the neurosurgeon began performing surgeries at an academic medical center where he was also named as Chair of Neurosurgery. The for-profit denies any misuse of its peer-review process and bases its decision on the multiple claims brought by other physicians and patients that the neurosurgeon was over treating patients in order to make more money for himself.
The options for resolving this issue include defending the suit in court, going to arbitration, going to mediation, or structuring a settlement.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of each resolution?
When addressing the hospital board of directors, what option would you recommend? Why is your recommendation the best option?
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Rubic_Print_Format
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
HLT-520 HLT-520-O500 Lawsuit Recommendation Paper 75.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 70.0%
Advantages and Disadvantages of an Arbitration Resolution 10.0% A description of the advantages and disadvantages of an arbitration resolution is not included. A description of the advantages and disadvantages of an arbitration resolution is incomplete or incorrect. A description of the advantages and disadvantages of an arbitration resolution is complete but lacks supporting detail. A description of the advantages and disadvantages of an arbitration resolution is complete and includes supporting detail. A description of the advantages and disadvantages of an arbitration resolution is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting detail.
Advantages and Disadvantages of a Mediation Resolution 10.0% A description of the advantages and disadvantages of a mediation resolution is not included. A description of the advantages and disadvantages of a mediation resolution is incomplete or incorrect. A description of the advantages and disadvantages of a mediation resolution is complete but lacks supporting detail. A description of the advantages and disadvantages of a mediation resolution is complete and includes supporting detail. A description of the advantages and disadvantages of a mediation resolution is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting detail.
Advantages and Disadvantages of a Settlement Resolution 10.0% A description of the advantages and disadvantages of a settlement resolution is not included. A description of the advantages and disadvantages of a settlement resolution is incomplete or incorrect. A description of the advantages and disadvantages of a settlement resolution is complete but lacks supporting detail. A description of the advantages and disadvantages of a settlement resolution is complete and includes supporting detail. A description of the advantages and disadvantages of a settlement resolution is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting detail.
Resolution Recommendation 40.0% An explanation of the recommended resolution option and the rationale for choosing it is not included. An explanation of the recommended resolution option and the rationale for choosing it is incomplete or incorrect. An explanation of the recommended resolution option and the rationale for choosing it is complete but lacks supporting detail. An explanation of the recommended resolution option and the rationale for choosing it is complete and includes supporting detail. An explanation of the recommended resolution option and the rationale for choosing it is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting detail.
Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format 10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code “Newclient”
