Physician Assisted-Suicide
Prompt: In this activity, you’ll create an annotated bibliography by following the steps below and answering the questions as thoroughly as possible. The questions will prompt you to engage in a conversation with your sources. You will need to follow the steps below three times (for your three different sources).
Before you begin, make sure you have:
Selected sources from the Opposing Viewpoints database or the Academic Search Ultimate database.
• Applied the C.R.A.A.P test to the sources to determine if they are credible and reliable. (You can download a copy of The C.R.A.A.P. Test Worksheet. Remember, credible sources should score 35 points or more on the test.)
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
Identify your sources, including author, title, and the database information or website.
Summarize your source. (Use the template below.)
It seems this source is arguing ____________________. This source is using this evidence to support the argument: ____________________.
A counterargument for one of the provided sources could be: __________________________________.
Credibility and Relevance
Explain the rationale for the credibility of the source by providing supporting evidence. (Use the template below.)
Personally, I believe the source is doing a (good job/bad job) of supporting its arguments because ____________________.
Explain the relevance of the source to your argument. (Use the template below.)
I think this source will be very helpful in supporting my argument because ________________________.
Guidelines for Submission: Your annotations must include at least three sources. Save your work in a Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Then, check your writing for errors.
Running head: PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE MIND MAP 1
PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE MIND MAP 2
Physician-Assisted Suicide Mind Map
Main topic: why should it be illegalized?
Sub-points:
1. Doctors must treat patients following Hippocratic Oath proclaims
2. Physicians should practice palliative care instead of using lethal drugs to kill terminally ill patients.
Main topic: Euthanasia is harmful because it doesn’t allow people to see human life as sacred
Sub-topics:
1. The Hippocratic Oath isn’t compatible with Euthanasia
2. Analyze the risk in providing state mandates for or against doctor-assisted suicide.
Physician-assisted suicide
Main topic: consequences of legalizing PAS
Sub-topics:
1. Decreased physician professionalism
2. the possibility of error
3. A diminished physician-patient relationship, and
4. A slippery slope toward the practice of euthanasia.
Main topic: what we can do to make it illegal?
Sub-topics:
1. Practice hospice care that allows people to die with dignity.
2. To relieve pain instead of killing.
3. To help friends, patients and families face up to death.
Keywords: physician-assisted suicide, Hippocratic Oath, lethal-medications, palliative care, hospice care, legalization, and illegalization.
Main topic: Physician-assisted suicide should be illegal
Main Idea 1: Euthanasia is harmful because it doesn’t allow people to see human life as sacred.
A. The Hippocratic Oath isn’t compatible with Euthanasia.
1. Physician-assisted suicide according to Brueck & Sulmasy (2019) is the point whereby doctors provide a platform for ending the life of a terminally ill patient.
2. The Hippocratic Oath is the standards that doctors are expected to maintain.
B. Euthanasia encourages abuse, allowing doctors to justify murder by framing it in compassionate terms.
1. Laws were written to protect people from killing.
2. The abuse of sedation techniques can be euthanasia.
Main Idea 2: the quality of life for the past years has been increased by the technological advancement.
A. Before, there were no breakthroughs with the opportunity of saving lives and later history will help save even more lives.
1. Modern respirators and defibrillator are examples of Innovations that been used in medical technology to correct abnormal heartbeats and saving lives (Byock, 2016).
2. Medical response trauma teams are the current recommended executive nursing policies used during the care of terminally ill patients (Knaplund, 2010).
B. Despite these remarkable breakthroughs that help those badly injured, the law becomes vague and allows more opportunities for misinterpretation on defining death.
1. The President’s Commission forced the U.S Supreme Court and healthcare facilities to make tough decisions regarding death.
2. Society views made gradual dying as a medical crisis instead of accepting a natural process of life as a norm.
Main Idea 3: hospice care is the alternative care used by doctors to reduce the pain of terminally-ill patients instead of ending a life (Elmore, Wright & Paradis, 2018).
A. Hospice is a better alternative care than killing a patient.
1. Some thought dying that it made sense that a man chose to die in his house surrounded by family and made comfortably by hospice doctors and nurses.
2. A physician expressed his findings in Hospice, “You can only fail a patient if you fail to understand and respond to their needs (Brueck & Sulmasy, 2019).
B. Hospice gradually became known to help patients that know they only have a few months to live.
1. Palliative care is given to patients to ease their symptoms and pain.
2. Hospice care is given by doctors for as long time as possible as long as the terminally ill patient is improving (Byock, 2016).
Conclusion
Even though mercy killing remains to be a controversial topic, killing ought to never be legalized. Because of therapeutic advances made by innovation and analysts, they have discovered hospice care as an option for the in critical condition. Life is a valuable blessing. Killing opposes fundamental standards of life. Despite the fact that patients fear death and may see no hope, they should be continually helped to remember the alternatives in contrast to killing.
References
Byock, I. (2016). The case against physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. The Oxford handbook of ethics at the end of life, 366.
Brueck, M. A., & Sulmasy, D. P. (2019). The genealogy of death: A chronology of US organizations promoting euthanasia and assisted suicide. Palliative & supportive care, 17(5), 604-608.
Elmore, J., Wright, D. K., & Paradis, M. (2018). Nurses’ moral experiences of assisted death: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Nursing Ethics, 25(8), 955-972.
Knaplund, K. S. (2010). Montana becomes third our state to allow physician aid in dying. American Bar Association Section of Real Property, Trust, and Estate Law eReport, Forthcoming.
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code “Newclient”
