written assignment talent management and human resource development

After exploring the role of Human Resource Management and its various requirements, it’s now time to demonstrate that you can apply these concepts in your own chosen industry or career path! Late work will lose 10% each day. You may consider researching how other organizations have managed these core HRM policies, practices and procedures. Specifically, consider what you have learned over this first few chapters and write an essay that explores in detail:

  • typical approaches to recruiting applicants for common jobs in your industry or career path
  • common selection processes in your industry or career path, including interview methods, selection tests, etc.
  • descriptions of new-hire training, onboarding, and ongoing development processes in your industry or career path
  • effective methods for performance appraisal, coaching, and feedback to employees for jobs in your industry or career path

This assignment should include at least 6 pages of double-spaced content in 12-point Times New Roman font, summarizing your key learnings in class and how they are relevant in your industry or career path. Written assignments require application of content from the textbook and any other learning materials provided in the course, as well as your own independent research (especially around industry-specific aspects of the assignment).

Your paper should be formatted and written in the style dictated by the American Psychological Association (APA) 6.0 Style guidelines. Please see the Lynn Library APA Style guide (Links to an external site.) for assistance here, including the pre-formatted template in Microsoft Word (Links to an external site.). You do not need to use an Abstract or a Table of Contents, but you will need a Title Page and a References Page in the correct formats. You are strongly encouraged to work with the Writing Lab (Links to an external site.) to get assistance with your academic writing; take advantage of this free service, as part of your university education!

You must use APA-formatted in-text citations and References to indicate the source of any ideas you apply from other authors. You are encouraged to summarize and paraphrase whenever possible rather than directly quoting, as your instructor is much more interested in what you now know and understand than in what you can quote from your research. (However, citations and References are still required, even if you’re not directly quoting.)

All written assignments in this course follow the 300 Level Grading Rubric for Written Communications, which is listed below. Your grade will be determined by the ratings you earn on each line of the rubric, so please pay close attention to the descriptions of each item.

Textbook
Title: Managing Human Resources (17th Edition)
Authors: Scott Snell, Shad Morris, and George W. Bohlander

Rubric

300 Level Grading Rubric: Written Communication v2018

300 Level Grading Rubric: Written Communication v2018

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting strategy appropriate to genrethreshold: 3.83 pts

5.0 ptsConsistently used correct writing strategies specific to genre

4.33 ptsMostly used correct writing strategies specific to genre

3.83 ptsUsed some correct writing strategies specific to genre

3.33 ptsMinimally used correct writing strategies specific to genre

0.0 ptsDid not use correct writing strategies specific to genre

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction and thesis statementthreshold: 7.65 pts

10.0 ptsThoroughly engaging introduction, revealed a clear and substantive thesis

8.65 ptsEngaging introduction, revealed a clear thesis

7.65 ptsIntroduction revealed a thesis lacking in clarity

6.65 ptsIntroduction revealed a general topic but not a thesis

0.0 ptsLittle or no introductory material

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Area (added by Instructor)threshold: 30.6 pts

40.0 ptsExcellent

34.6 ptsAbove Average

30.6 ptsAverage

26.6 ptsBelow Average

0.0 ptsUnacceptable

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganizationthreshold: 7.65 pts

10.0 ptsStructure enhanced the argument, clearly organized paragraphs and seamless transitions

8.65 ptsMostly successful structure, paragraphs, and transitions

7.65 ptsOrganization is inconsistent or uneven

6.65 ptsOrganization is in the way of reading for content

0.0 ptsLack of coherent organization

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence / Supporting ideasthreshold: 11.48 pts

15.0 ptsConsistently developed strong arguments with academically valid evidence

12.98 ptsMostly developed strong arguments with academically valid evidence

11.48 ptsDeveloped some arguments with academically valid evidence

9.98 ptsMinimally developed arguments with academically valid evidence

0.0 ptsDid not develop arguments with academically valid evidence

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusionthreshold: 3.83 pts

5.0 ptsThoroughly engaging conclusion, fully reviewed thesis and main ideas

4.33 ptsEngaging conclusion, reviewed thesis and main ideas

3.83 ptsConclusion reviewed some main ideas

3.33 ptsConclusion minimally reviewed main ideas

0.0 ptsLittle or no conclusive material

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, spelling, and writing stylethreshold: 7.65 pts

10.0 ptsConsistently used correct grammar, spelling, and writing style. Virtually no errors

8.65 ptsMostly used correct grammar, spelling, and writing style. Some minor errors

7.65 ptsFrequent minor errors of grammar, spelling, or writing style

6.65 ptsSerious errors of grammar, spelling, or writing style

0.0 ptsGrammar or spelling errors get in the way of reading for content

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLayout and documentation (APA, Chicago, etc.)threshold: 3.83 pts

5.0 ptsConsistently used correct layout and documentation. Virtually no errors

4.33 ptsMostly used correct layout and documentation. Some minor errors

3.83 ptsFrequent minor errors of layout or documentation

3.33 ptsSerious errors of layout or documentation

0.0 ptsLittle or no documentation

5.0 pts

T

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *