Organisational stressors and there effect on performers

    Introduction Stress is a factor of ways of life that impacts everybody, but according to Parkes, Athletes and […]

Essay !!

I want you to write summary that includes ( comparison and cause and effect and definition of the topic that Iam going to attach it ) please be organized and be sure that your read my pages and I want you to use these wok cites(its in the last page of the material that iam going to attach) and its in MLA style ” Introduction to StopGreenwash.org.” stopgreenwash.org. Greenspace, n.d. Sustianbility Law at Lewis & Clark Law School. Sustainability Law, 6 Dec 2013. Web 17 Apr 2014. Joshi, Monika.” Sustainability is about more than recycling at top colleges .” USA Today April 19, 2014. Academic Search Complete. Web.7 Apr,2014. Mascarelli, Amanda Leigh.” How Green Is Your Campus? ” Nature 461,7261 (2009): 154-155 Academic Search Complete. Web 21 Feb 2014. Ricketts, Glenn M. ” The Roots Sustainability.” Academic Quistions 23.1 (2010):20-53. Web 5 Mar.2014 

.awasam-promo {
background-color: #9ED5EA;
color: white;
text-align: center;
padding: 10px;
}

.button {
background-color: #4CAF50;
border: none;
color: white;
padding: 10px 20px;
text-align: center;
text-decoration: none;
display: inline-block;
font-size: 16px;
margin: 4px 2px;
cursor: pointer;
border-radius: 10px;
}

.awasam-alert {
color: red;
}

“Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us”
Use the following coupon
FIRST15

Order Now

The post Essay !! appeared first on Savvy Essay Writers.

Science Quality Improvement Paper

Purpose

This assignment provides the opportunity for the graduate nurse practitioner student to become familiar with research processes which are specific to quality improvement.  The graduate nursing student will develop a State of the Science Evidence-Based Practice Project that is focused on quality improvement.

Note: The process began in Week 2 with the formation of a PICO question. Week 4 was Part 1 of the paper which laid the ground work for the project. Part 2 of the Project in Week 6 adds the following elements:  Abstract, Review of the Literature (State of the Science), strengths and limitations of current evidence, and development of a quality enhancement (improvement) plan that addresses limitations of current practice evidence.

Requirements:

Preparing the Assignment:  Part 2 Criteria for Content

Abstract:

The abstract should be succinct, comprehensive, and follow and include these APA components (accurate, non-evaluative, coherent, readable and concise).

A description of the problem under investigation (one sentence), participants, and essential features of the quality improvement project which include setting, supporting theory, stakeholders and outcome measurements that would be used to determine efficacy of quality improvement project are included.

(See APA 6th ed., for abstract examples and explanation; p. 25-26)

 

State-of-the-Science Review of the Literature (ROL):

See Polit & Beck, 2018, 9th ed., Ch. 7 for description of ROL.

This section will describe the state of the science related to the PICO question and problem statement, purpose of the quality project.

1. A minimum of 6 (six) appropriate research-based scholarly references (articles) must be used. Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided.  References are current if within a 5-year time frame (3 years is best) unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them prior to submission of the assignment.

2. The evidence should be critically reviewed and synthesized.

3. The strengths and limitations of the current evidence and current practice are described which provide evidence for practice change clearly supported

4. The identified area of issue or gap in practice is made clear using evidence and is compelling and significant.

5. No more than three (3) direct quotes are used.

Quality Change Plan:

In this section the writer will create an inter-disciplinary quality improvement plan for their future practice area.  The JH Action Planning Tool may be used as a guide but is not required to be submitted along with the project.  This section should be supported by scholarly in-text citations and include the following sections:

1. Feasible plan for implementation: Select a model for use, such as the Plan/Do/Study/Act Model.

2. Identification of key stakeholders with rationale for identification.

3. Identification of appropriate interdisciplinary team members to assemble with rationale.

4. A plan for outcome analysis (this should include independent and dependent variables as well as an overview of a method of statistical analysis (which statistics or outcome measures).

5. Ethical considerations: Protection of Human Subjects.

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions:

1. Page length:  Part 2 of the paper (excluding the title page and reference page) shouldn’t be more than 10 pages maximum.

2. Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.

3. Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.

4. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific, scholarly writing.  First person writing should not be utilized.

Remember:  All sections should have scholarly resources integrated as in-text citations that support the content.  APA current edition is required for all elements of the paper.

Rubric Glossary of Achievement Terms

Comprehensive:  

1. Of Large Scope, Covering or Involving Much; Inclusive

2. Comprehending or thoroughly understanding with one’s mind; having an extensive mental range or grasp of aparticular subject.

Thorough:  

· Detailed, accurate, careful

· Attentive to detail, accurate, but less than comprehensive in scope, depth or inclusivity

Superficial:

· Not thorough, on the surface

· Of little substance, lacking thoroughness

Ill-Prepared / Un-structured:

· Inadequately prepared, lack of care for detail

· Lacking organization, disorganized

Succinct

· Expressed in few words, verbal brevity

· Compressed expression

Webster’s Online Dictionary:  Retrieved from https://www.dictionary.com/

 

ASSIGNMENT CONTENT
Category Points % Description
Abstract

 

 

40 20% Abstract is succinct and comprehensive, follows and includes the APA (accurate, non-evaluative, coherent, readable and concise).

A description of the problem under investigation (one sentence), participants, and essential features of the quality improvement project which include setting, supporting theory, stakeholders and outcome measurements that would be used to determine efficacy of quality improvement project are included.

(See APA 6th ed., for abstract examples and explanation; p. 25-26)

State of the Science ROL 50 25% Review of the Literature 

1. A minimum of 6 (six) appropriate research-based scholarly references (articles) must be used.

2. The evidence should be critically reviewed, compared and contrasted, and synthesized.

3. The strengths and limitations of the current evidence and current practice are described which provide evidence for practice change clearly supported

4. The identified area of issue or gap in practice is made clear using evidence and is compelling and significant.

5. No more than 3 direct quotes are used

Quality Change Plan 

 

 

 

70 35% Quality Change Plan 

Inter-disciplinary Quality Plan Supported by Scholarly In-text Citations and include the following sections:

1. Feasible plan for implementation: Select a model for use, such as the Plan/Do/Study/Act    Model.

2. Identification of key stakeholders with rationale for identification.

3. Identification of appropriate interdisciplinary team members to assemble with rationale.

4. A plan for outcome analysis (this should include independent and dependent variables as well as an overview of a method of statistical analysis (which statistics or outcome measures).

5. Ethical considerations: Protection of Human Subjects.

Summary/ Appendix 

 

25 13% The conclusion restates the main sections of the paper.  It should contain a few sentences from each section, sequentially representing the flow of the paper.  The last few sentences of the summary section should pull the paper together by addressing an overview for future projects or by stating the projects importance and implications for practice.

The appendix includes the Johns Hopkins PICO question formation and ROL tools.

  185 93% Total CONTENT Points= 185 pts
ASSIGNMENT FORMAT
Category Points % Description
APA, Syntax, Grammar, Spelling 15 15 1. Page length:  Part 2 of the paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be 10 pages maximum.

2. Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.

3. Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.

4. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific, scholarly writing.  First person writing should not be utilized.

Remember:  All sections should have scholarly resources integrated as in-text citations that support the content.  APA current edition is required for all elements of the paper.

  15 7% Total FORMAT Points= 15 pts
    100% ASSIGNMENT TOTAL=200 points

Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAbstract

Abstract is succinct and comprehensive, follows and includes APA components:   Accurate, non-evaluative, coherent and readable, concise.   Describes the problem under investigation (one sentence), participants, essential features of the quality improvement project to include setting, supporting theory, stakeholders and outcome measurements that would be used to determine efficacy of quality improvement project.

40.0 pts

Excellent

Abstract is succinct and comprehensive, follows and includes APA components: Accurate, non-evaluative, coherent and readable, concise. Describes the problem under investigation (one sentence), participants, essential features of the quality improvement project to include setting, supporting theory, stakeholders and outcome measurements that would be used to determine efficacy of quality improvement project.

36.0 pts

V. Good

Abstract is thorough but not comprehensive in in general or in one or two areas: Accurate, non-evaluative, coherent and readable, concise. Describes the problem under investigation (one sentence), participants, essential features of the quality improvement project to include setting, supporting theory, stakeholders and outcome measurements that would be used to determine efficacy of quality improvement project.

33.0 pts

Satisfactory

Abstract superficially addresses all APA components or may be missing two components (for example, setting, theory or stakeholders).

20.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Abstract is ill-prepared, unstructured, and is missing most of the major components per APA

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Abstract is missing completely or is ill-prepared, does not address the APA…

Submission of Oral Presentation – Business management homework help

Question description

In business, it is necessary to clearly articulate what accomplishments are made, what activities are happening or ongoing, and what problems or opportunities there may be in within or outside of the organization. Additionally, to stand out as a valuable employee to leadership in an organization, you must possess the ability to document and orally communicate your value to the organization. Developing strong verbal communication skills and the ability to deliver well thought out and relevant talking points in a formal, audiovisual presentation is a highly desirable competency that employers look for in prospective leaders. Assignment: Since public speaking is one of the weakest competencies for many professionals, this performance based learning activity will help strengthen your knowledge, skills, abilities, and behaviors in public speaking. KapTalk is a Kaplan University School of Business program designed to help you refine and strengthen your verbal communication abilities. DIRECTIONS: Preparation: Visit the Capstone Experience website at http://www.capstoneX.com and review the KapTalk public speaking materials to better understand what it takes to deliver an effective public speaking performance. In addition, you will be required to electronically sign a release for the materials you will create as part of Kap-talk, see website for details. Practice: Develop a minimum 10-slide PowerPoint presentation and add audio to it. Access instructions on how to add audio to your presentation located in Doc Sharing. Use the grading rubric provided in this Assignment to judge your performance. Using the criteria found in the Assignment grading rubric, evaluate your own presentation. Feel free to reach out to your fellow learners to ask if they will help review your presentation using the grading rubric. It is highly recommended that you correspond with and receive feedback from your fellow learners. You should also participate in providing feedback to your fellow learners as well. Unit 7 [MT490 Career Engagement] Page 2 of 6 Perform: In this Assignment, you will have the option of selecting the type of presentation you will produce and deliver. Whichever presentation type you select, you will be required to deliver the presentation based on your experiences working for your internship/externship employer. Select a presentation type from the following list: ● Sell a product or a service ● Conduct an instructional session on a topic ● Defend an argument or position the business is taking ● Explain your position on a research topic relating to the business strategy ● Play a role in an informational interview about the business ● Deliver a motivational speech about the business or your experience Example 1: If the business provides a service, your presentation will be to sell that product as if you were in front of a potential customer. Example 2: If there is research being conducted or research you believe should be conducted to move the businesses strategy forward, take a position (positive or negative), and provide reasoning for your position based on experience, and in relation to theories and concepts from the research. Requirements: 1. View the PowerPoint best practices (Writing Center link: https://kucampus.kaplan.edu/MyStudies/AcademicSupportCenter/WritingCenter/WritingReferenceLibrary/WritingTypesAndTools/CreatingEffectivePowerpointPresentations.aspx) 2. Prepare a 10 minute presentation on your chosen topic using a specified presentation type. 3. Create a minimum of 10 PowerPoint slides (excluding cover slide and reference slide). 4. Use a minimum of 3 references to support or refute your experiences, observations, thoughts, ideas, etc. 5. Keep in mind all of the Professional Competencies when you present. 6. Submit your PowerPoint Presentation (with audio) to the Unit 6 Discussion Board and provide a detailed description of your presentation. 7. Provide feedback on a minimum of two of your fellow learners’ presentations. 8. After incorporating the feedback you received from your classmates, update your presentation and submit to the Unit 7: Kap-Talk Assignment Dropbox. Professional Competencies PC -1: Teamwork: Work in teams to achieve collective goals. PC 1.1: Engage in a team setting with professional integrity and respect. PC 1.2: Contribute to team goals and objectives through active participation and collaboration. PC 1.3: Apply conflict management skills to resolve issues and/or build team alliances. Unit 7 [MT490 Career Engagement] Page 3 of 6 PC-2: Leadership: Demonstrate leadership knowledge, skills, and abilities to successfully lead teams within one’s profession. PC 2.1: Achieve goals through planning and prioritization. PC 2.2: Formulate innovative solutions for identified initiatives. PC 2.3: Demonstrate integrity through the application of relevant codes of conduct and social responsibility within one’s profession. PC 2.4: Develop an inspirational vision or mission. PC 2.5: Model leadership skills by developing trusting relationships, respect, conflict resolution skills, and civic-mindedness. PC-3: Personal Presentation: Demonstrate professionalism in a variety of situations. PC 3.1: Conduct oneself to reflect the professional characteristics and culture of a given work setting. PC 3.2: Interact with others in a professional manner using appropriate communication and presentation skills. PC 3.3: Convey competence through demonstrating characteristics such as reliability, accountability, and timeliness. PC 3.4: Project a professional image, such as appearance, confidence, and attitude, for a given work environment. PC 3.5: Engage in career development and advancement strategies, including effective networking, mentoring, and creating a personal brand. PC 4: Multiculturalism and Diversity: Leverage the strengths of multiculturalism and diversity for the benefit of the organization and community. PC 4.1: Assess the value of multiculturalism and diversity in a global environment. PC 4.2: Demonstrate an understanding of how one’s perspective toward multiculturalism and diversity impacts an organization. PC 4.3: Apply concepts of multiculturalism and diversity to become an agent of change. PC-5: Communications: Demonstrate professional written and verbal communication to achieve positive results. PC 5.1: Use language that is clear, concise, and organized. PC 5.2: Use appropriate communication for a particular audience. PC- 6 Problem Solving and Critical Thinking: Apply critical thinking and problem solving behaviors. PC 6.1: Incorporate data, inferences, and reasoning to solve problems. PC 6.2: Communicate the critical thinking process by which one arrives at a conclusion. Unit 7 [MT490 Career Engagement] Page 4 of 6 PC 6.3: Integrate standards of the field and ethical principles into the problem solving process.

The post Submission of Oral Presentation – Business management homework help appeared first on Quality Nursing Writers.

 

“Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!”

Essay Writing Service


Submission of Oral Presentation – Business management homework help was first posted on June 26, 2020 at 4:15 am.
©2020 "Best Essays". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at ukbestwriting@gmail.com