250 words abstract

– write an abstract for a ten pages technical paper

– around 250 words

– topics can be anything relate to space/space travel/astronomy

– will post another post for the technical paper in the future

WE ALL KNOW CLASSWORK IS BORING. THUS, OUR ESSAY HELP SERVICE EXISTS TO HELP STUDENTS WHO ARE OVERWHELMED WITH STUDIES. ORDER YOUR CUSTOM PAPER FOR 20% DISCOUNT. USE CODE SAVE20

Source link


250 words abstract was first posted on July 21, 2020 at 12:50 pm.
©2020 "My Assignment Geek". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at savvyessaywriters@gmail.com

what are the most important considerations when interpreting achievement test scores why

I am looking for a 150-200-word response (each) to 2 questions. Each need at least two scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source included. I have provided 6 resources for Question 1 & 3 for Question 2

Question 1

What are the most important considerations when interpreting achievement test scores? Why? What are the most important considerations when making decisions based on achievement test scores? Why?

References:

O’Brien, J., Winn, R., & Currier, K. (2014). Not all tests are created equal. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 17(2), 41–48. doi:10.1177/1555458914528911

Brookhart, S. M., & Chen, F. (2015). The quality and effectiveness of descriptive rubrics. Educational Review, 67(3), 343–368. doi:10.1080/00131911.2014.929565

Holloway, J. H. (2001). The Use and Misuse of Standardized Tests. Educational Leadership, 59(1), 77-78. Retrieved from https://search-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/lo…

Jonsson, A., Mattheos, N., Svingby, G., & Attstrom, R. (2007). Dynamic assessment and the “Interactive Examination.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 17–27. Retrieved from https://search-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/lo…

Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130-144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002

Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I’ve got it: A process model of perceived control and children’s engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 22. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.22

Question 2

What is the difference between item discrimination and item difficulty? In what ways are these measures valuable in the evaluation of a test? Why?

References:

Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309-319. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309

Weiss, D. J. (1982). Improving measurement quality and efficiency with adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 473–492. doi:10.1177/014662168200600408

Weiss, D. J. (2013). Item banking, test development, and test delivery. In APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, Vol. 1: Test theory and testing and assessment in industrial and organizational psychology. (pp. 185–200). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14047-010

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient”for a 15% Discount!”


Buy Custom Nursing Papers

The post what are the most important considerations when interpreting achievement test scores why appeared first on Student Homeworks.

7 2 milestone three financing and track record 2

The business I chose for this project is Nordstrom Inc. and the expansion of the company is in Italy

Prompt:

Submit a short paper that addresses Section III, Part C; Section V; and Section VI of the final project.

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed: III. Justification:

C. Financial impact. This section should discuss the project’s most likely financial implications and the consolidated financial projection with and without the project. Be sure to:

  1. Project the incremental, annual, and cumulative cash benefits and outflows associated with the proposed expansion for the next seven to 10 years, using a spreadsheet or other relevant presentation vehicle to support your narrative. Be sure to justify your assumptions and methodology based on sound microeconomic and financial principles. For example, what assumptions have you made about demand, price, volume, capital purchase costs, incremental hiring, and so on?
  2. Develop a consolidated financial projection of revenue, pretax income, and cash flow for the overall business, over that same number of years, both with and without the proposed investment. Use a spreadsheet or other relevant presentation vehicle to support your narrative, being sure to describe any relevant assumptions.
  1. Financing: In this section, compare the proposed loan to alternative financing methods. Specifically:
    1. Weigh the pros and cons of raising money using internal financing mechanisms versus seeking funding through global capital markets via loans,commercial paper, bonds, or equity financing. Which might be viable alternatives should the loan not be approved? Support your answer withappropriate research and evidence.
    2. Assess the viability of a business combination as a mechanism for expanding into the new market. Is this a reasonable option for the company? Whyor why not? Support your answer with appropriate research and evidence.
  2. Track Record: Use this section to persuade the lender that you are credit-worthy. You must:
    1. Convincingly argue that your organization is on solid financial footing, and thus at a low risk for default, supporting your argument with appropriatefinancial statements, ratios, and other indicators of financial performance and health.
    2. Convincingly argue for your organization’s trustworthiness, providing credible evidence of legal and ethical financial behavior. For example, thismight include recent audit results; credit history; absence of significant lawsuits, recalls, or regulatory judgments; or other evidence designed to show that the company holds itself to the highest legal and ethical standards.

Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your investment project and justification paper should be approximately 8–10 pages in length (excluding spreadsheets, other exhibits,

and list of references as necessary). It should be double-spaced with 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins, and should use APA format for references and citations.

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient”for a 15% Discount!”


Buy Custom Nursing Papers

The post 7 2 milestone three financing and track record 2 appeared first on Student Homeworks.

research validity

Case Study

  1. Provide a detailed overview of each of the following types of research validity:
    • internal validity
    • external validity
    • construct validity
    • conclusion validity
  2. Provide a detailed overview of each of the following types of research designs:
    • non-experimental research design
    • quasi-experimental research design
    • true experimental research design
  3. Finally, explain the extent and manner in which each type of research design does or does not minimize threats to each of the 4 types of research validity.
  4. Must be 4-5 pages in length in APA format, clear focus on specified task

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient”for a 15% Discount!”

We have Walden University and Capella University nursing practitioners!


Buy Custom Nursing Papers