Screening for Malingering in a Criminal-Forensic

Home
Psychology homework help

Report Issue

To prepare:

Review the articles “Screening for Malingering in a Criminal-Forensic Sample with the Personality Assessment Inventory” and “An Evaluation of Malingering Screens with Competency to Stand Trial Patients: A Known-Groups Comparison.” Consider the benefits of tools forensic psychology professionals use to identify criminal defendants that are malingerers.
Review the article “Clinical and Conceptual Problems in the Attribution of Malingering in Forensic Evaluations.” Think about some of the limitations of tools used to assess malingering.
Review the article “Therapy vs. Forensics: Irreconcilable Conflict Between Therapeutic and Forensic Roles of Mental Health Professionals.” Think about the differences in therapeutic and forensic psychology roles.

With these thoughts in mind:

Post by Day 3 a brief summary of your understanding of malingering, and why you think criminal defendants might be inclined to malinger. Discuss the benefits and limitations of tools forensic psychology professionals use to determine if a criminal defendant is malingering. Finally, explain the major differences in the roles of therapeutic and forensic psychology.

Learning Resources
Readings

Article: Boccaccinim M. T., Murrie, D. C., & Duncan, S. A. (2006). Screening for malingering in a criminal-forensic sample with the personality assessment inventory. Psychological Assessment, 18(4), 415–423. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Article: Greenburg, S. A., & Shuman, D. W. (1997). Irreconcilable conflict between therapeutic and forensic roles. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28(1), 50–57. Retrieved from http://drbevsmallwood.com/Forensic_vs_Therapeutic.pdf
Article: Vitacco, M. J., Rogers, R., Gabel, J., & Munizza, J. (2007). An evaluation of malingering screens with competency to stand trial patients: A known-groups comparison. Law and Human Behavior, 31(3), 249–260. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

 

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code “Newclient”

structure of indifference by by Adele Perry and Mary Jane Logan McCallum

Using three academic sources and an article that was written/produced by a media outlet in addition to Structures of Indifference, answer the following questions:
How is Sinclair represented?  Does systemic oppression affect Brian Sinclair?  Do you think his experience was unique? Why or why not?  Do you think people who are perceived to be living in poverty experience social services differently than the rest of the population?  Is this consistent with what scholars say about the issues? If so, how?  If not, how was Sinclairs situation unique? 

Also, identify at least one Calgary agency you think could help someone facing similar challenges.

Provide a 4 6 page (double spaced) paper that addresses the questions, making use of Structures of Indifference, three scholarly sources and a media piece within the paper.
Only focus on the last slide of the additional materials

Do you agree or disagree with her belief that Triumph of the Will is a “pure historical film” and “not a propaganda film”? Explain and include at least one example from the documentary.

UNIT FOUR: THE OBSERVATIONAL MODE

PART 1: Please answer all of the following questions and include specific examples from the online screening(s) assigned each week. If more than one screening is assigned for a particular week, you should address both films and compare and contrast the key differences. Each answer should be approximately one paragraph (5-7 sentences typed). To receive full credit, you should also incorporate and cite at least one passage from Bill Nichols’ Introduction to Documentary and/or another assigned reading.

Cinematography can greatly affect how a subject(s) is represented. For example:

In a low angle shot, the camera is below the subject, looking up, which in effect, makes the characters appear larger, more imposing, threatening.
In a high angle shot, the camera looks down on the subject, which in effect, makes character appear vulnerable, insignificant or small
Long Take: an uninterrupted shot usually lasting several minutes that has the double potential of preserving both real space and real time. A “realist” aesthetic.
Please explain the effect/significance of the key choices in composition and camera movement in one key scene from at least one required screening or clip assigned this week.

Although Battle of Midway (1942) is one of the first examples of the shaky “hand-held camera” aesthetic that later became a major characteristic of documentaries, sound at the time was not portable and had to be recreated in the studio during post production (along with the voice over narration). However, in the late 1950s and early 1960s, Direct Cinema became one of the first major film movements to use the hand-held camera to even greater effect, largely because sound was also portable and synchronous. Given these technological shifts and different approaches in representing real life subjects, what are the key differences between the hand-held aesthetic in Battle of Midway (1942) and some of the Direct Cinema films/clips assigned this week?

In Direct Cinema documentaries sound is synchronous and taken on location. In other words sound and/or music is usually not incorporated later into the film in post-production. Although there are many screenings and clips assigned for this week, please focus on one in particular to analyze the use of sound and/or music. Does the filmmaker record synchronous sound at the time of shooting or does he/she add additional sound, such as voice-over, dubbed dialogue, music, sound effects, or commentary, at a later point? Please focus on one example from this particular documentary and explain the effect/significance of these choices.

Can the Observational Mode be used a form of propaganda to persuade viewers? This may be achieved through emotional music, low or high camera angles that make the subject appear empowered or disempowered, “voice of god” narration used to “educate” viewers as well as through editing such as when two or more shots are juxtaposed together to create specific a meaning. Does the filmmaker present a balanced representation of the subject(s)? What forms of propaganda (if any) are used, in TRIUMPH OF THE WILL? How are they represented stylistically and what is the effect/significance? Please contextualize your response with passages/idea from Frank P. Tomasulo’s “The Mass Psychology of Fascist Cinema.”

In 1964, approximately 30 years after Triumph of the Will was first released, Riefenstahl stated:

“If you see this film again today you ascertain that it doesn’t contain a single reconstructed scene. Everything in it is true. And it contains no tendentious commentary at all. It is history. A pure historical film… it is film-vérité. It reflects the truth that was then in 1934, history. It is therefore a documentary. Not a propaganda film. Oh! I know very well what propaganda is. That consists of recreating events in order to illustrate a thesis, or, in the face of certain events, to let one thing go in order to accentuate another. I found myself, me, at the heart of an event which was the reality of a certain time and a certain place. My film is composed of what stemmed from that.” (Thomson, David (2010). The New Biographical Dictionary of Film, Fifth Edition. New York: Knopf. p. 822. ISBN 978-0-307-27174-7)

Do you agree or disagree with her belief that Triumph of the Will is a “pure historical film” and “not a propaganda film”? Explain and include at least one example from the documentary.

Although Primary (1960) is often cited as the first instance of “Direct Cinema” and Triumph of the Will (1936) is regarded as a propaganda film, both could be perceived as “observational” depictions of politicians (Hitler and JFK). Please choose a clip from Triumph of the Will and compare it to the clip from Primary to briefly analyze some of the key differences and similarities in terms of how these subjects are represented?

Please briefly contextualize and explain the significance of the clips from Don’t Look Back (1967) with the key ideas and concepts discussed in Jeanne Hall’s essay, “Don’t You Ever Just Watch? American Cinema Verite and Don’t Look Back.”

In Introduction to Documentary, Bill Nichols underscores key ethical issues of representation, and emphasizes following points:

An image cannot tell everything we want to know about what happened.
Images can altered both during and after the fact by both conventional and digital techniques.
A verifiable, authentic image does not necessarily guarantee the validity of larger claims made about what the image represents or means.
Although we may never know whether or not a documentary image is “verifiable” or “authentic,” are there any moments in this documentary where an image doesn’t tell us everything that may have happened? Are there key images that might be missing or may have been altered or taken out of context? If so, which instances? Why do you think they were the altered? What is the significance/effect?

PART 2: Please choose 2 of the following clips and briefly analyze the key stylistic characteristics and discuss their greater significance. Each clip analysis should be approximately one paragraph (5-7 sentences typed). You may focus on cinematography, sound (including narration) and editing.

CLIP #1: Lumiere Shorts (Lumiere Brothers, late 1890s)

CLIP #2: Primary (Drew Associates, USA, 1960, 60 min)

CLIP #3: Don’t Look Back (D.A. Pennebaker, 1967, 96 min)

CLIP #4: High School (Frederick Wiseman, 1968, 75 min)

CLIP #5: Salesman (Maysles Brothers, 1968, 85 min)

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient”for a 15% Discount!”

We have Walden University and Capella University nursing practitioners!


Buy Custom Nursing Papers

In a minimum of 300 words, identify at least one difference between the two types of evaluations (forensic psychological and traditional clinical psychological) in each of the following areas

Assignment 1: Clinical and Forensic Evaluations
A forensic mental health professional must learn to distinguish between forensic psychological evaluations and traditional clinical psychological evaluations although there are some similarities between the two.

Tasks:

In a minimum of 300 words, identify at least one difference between the two types of evaluations (forensic psychological and traditional clinical psychological) in each of the following areas:

Interviewing
Discussion of informed consent
Testing and assessment
Writing reports
Addressing the referral question
Providing opinions and recommendations
Support your responses by citing reputable source material used for this discussion in APA format.

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient”for a 15% Discount!”

We have Walden University and Capella University nursing practitioners!


Buy Custom Nursing Papers