Literature Review

Other

This should be your ‘proposal ready’ review of the literature, defining why you think the study is important, and defending the choices, you have made (intend to make) in the design and analysis of your data.

A key component of a research proposal is a review of the literature. You need to establish what is known and what is unknown about your chosen topic. This review and citations of the literature related to your methods are required.

This personal search, reading, and analysis of the current literature are demonstrated through the literature review section of your final proposal. You are to submit a publication-ready draft review of the literature section.

The assignment should generally be of adequate length to demonstrate your critical analysis and synthesis (conclusions) of a minimum of 10 references, with an additional attached page of the references.

This should be written as a cohesive paper that integrates and discusses the relevant literature that you have collected and reviewed.

This component should be in APA style and be ‘publication ready’

This assignment is a key portion of your final research proposal and subsequent paper. It is your analytical report of the material you have collected to identify what already known and unknown upon which you build your theory/question. You probably have additional papers you have read after the initial attempts you submitted needed to build the foundation of facts and theories for your research proposal.

The Literature Review section must be well cited, in APA format, and reasonably complete, and illustrative of the Universal Intellectual Standards (Paul & Elder 2010) (http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/universal-intellectual-standards/527) demonstrating your critical thinking skills. It should not have spelling or major grammar errors

This is an example for one Literature Review

Araga (2017) cited several authors when he stated:

A review of the existing literature was undertaken to determine which articles would best help answer the research questions. The main goal of the literature review was to assess the current theoretical and scientific knowledge regarding the phenomenon of disaster health management in Saudi Arabia [14] (Robinson D, Reed V 1998). Through the literature review, the researcher was able synthesize the information and data already known, and then determine what is unknown. A systematic and critical appraisal was undertaken of the most important and relevant literature regarding the phenomenon—disaster health management in KSA (McCourt et al. 2013). Through examining the extant literature, the researcher gained an understanding of the current situation; from such a background, recommendations can be made in the event that there are systemic barriers against the creation of a comprehensive plan. The following sections describe the literature search method, as well as the inclusion and exclusion criteria used in the selection of the studies being reviewed.

ECN 135 Fed independence The Federal Reserve System discussion

Business Finance

Read the above article about “Fed independence” and discuss the following. Should President Trump reduce the independence of the Fed? State your opinion and then provide some facts/evidence to support it. Note, there is no right or wrong stance to take, the key is to simply have an opinion and then argue for that opinion using facts and evidence from the course and other sources.

Your response must be 400 to 600 words.Please feel free to use information from class or other sources (Google searches and reading information online, reading other articles, etc.). Just do not copy someone else’s writing or ideas verbatim. That is plagiarism. I reserve the right to run written assignments through plagiarism software (e.g. turnitin.com).

Written Assignment Rubric

Standard Level Grade

Length and ReadabilityIs the submission in the 400-600 words range? Is the writing understandable?

5.0

Full Credit

3.0

Partial Credit

0.0

No Credit

5.0

Course ConceptDoes the submission accurately use a concept from ECN 135?

2.0

Full Credit

1.0

Partial Credit

0.0

No Credit

2.0

Applied KnowledgeDoes the submission apply knowledge from ECN 135 to answer the questions about the article? Does the submission make a coherent argument or provide a coherent answer to the questions asked using information from the article and the course?

3.0

Full Credit

2.0

Partial Credit

0.0

No Credit

3.0

Total 10.0

SOW3302 FAU Ethics And Dual Relationships In Social Work

Writing

5 – to 7-page (excluding the title page, abstract, and references- so ten pages

total) paper discussing a case vignette provided by the instructor and integrating relevant

information from a journal article(s) assigned by the instructor. This paper will be written in

stages. All the instructions and documents needed to complete the paper is attached below. Please read and follow the instructions for the paper. A rubric is also provided to follow. Do not accept the assignment if you can’t meet the deadline because I will not be able to give any additional time

South Florida Vendor Recommendation Business Memorandum

Writing

Problem description: You oversee a manufacturing facility that produces an automotive part (steel shaft for the gearbox). The acceptable dimension of the shaft is 2.5±0.05 inches in diameter with the most desirable product being exactly 2.5 inches. Two vendors are trying to sell their equipment for the shaft-machining task to your company, Automotive Parts Corporation. You have been asked to assess the equipment from each vendor, and to make a recommendation on which one to make the purchase from, supported by a justification for your decision.

You asked both vendors to supply data on the machining accuracy of their equipment for the given task. Both vendors machined 100 shafts, collected data, plotted histograms, fitted the histograms with normal distributions and supplied you with their findings

Let X= diameter in inches of the gearbox shaft
Ace Machines: X has a normal distribution with mean 2.48 and variance 0.001
Best Machinery: X has a normal distribution with mean 2.51 and variance 0.002

When you are completing your memorandum be sure to address the following:

  • Recommend a vendor using the given information, develop and discuss your approach (give all details including quantitative justification). Your response to this question must be directed to the audience described below.
  • Examine the scenario as described and discuss what additional information would be helpful to make this recommendation a stronger selection, and why that information would be useful. Be careful not to negate your recommendation as you explain this.
  • Include your calculations as a titled addendum on its own page at the end of your document.

Audience: You are creating this document for the company’s Chief Operating Officer, Lin Gerard, and copying the Chief Financial Officer, Aileen Kitts. Documents involved in major financial decisions like this may also be distributed by the addressees to other executives and the corporate board members.

Document: Complete this assignment as a memorandum. Follow the guidance for business memorandum provided in your reading. Utilize clear, professional language, including setting your Word preferences to check for a more professional writing approach. Examples of professional language constraints would include: