Case Assignment: Patient’s Quality of Life

Case Assignment: Patient’s Quality of Life

Case Assignment: Patient’s Quality of Life

Case Assignment: Patient’s Quality of Life

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT;Case Assignment: Patient’s Quality of Life

Week 2 Ethical Frameworks Essay Consider the “Four Topics Approach” (or Four Box method) to ethical decision making on page 61, Table 2.1 in Butts (below). Apply this model to a challenging situation in your nursing career that required you to consider the ethical dimensions of the patient case and the role you played in providing care. Specifically apply and address the questions within each topic area as they pertain to your situation. In your conclusion, discuss the impact of the Four Topics process. Did applying these principles shape your decision making in any way? Does this seem like a valid process for you to apply in your practice? Your paper should be 1-2 pages. Adhere to APA formatting throughout, and cite any outside sources you may use. Review the rubric for further information on how your assignment will be graded. Optional: You may download this pdf, complete it using correct grammar and APA, and submit it as your assignment in lieu of writing a paper. *You will need Adobe Acrobat in order to utilize this fillable .pdf form. Due: Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time) Points: 60 TABLE 2-1 Four Topics Method for Analysis of Clinical Ethics Cases Medical Indications: The Principles of Beneficence and Nonmaleficence 1. What is the patient’s medical problem? Is the problem acute? Chronic? Critical? Reversible? Emergent? Terminal? 2. What are the goals of treatment? 3. In what circumstances are medical treatments not indicated? 4. What are the probabilities of success of various treatment options? 5. In sum, how can this patient be benefited by medical and nursing care, and how can harm be avoided? Patient Preferences: The Principle of Respect for Autonomy 1. Has the patient been informed of benefits and risks, understood this information, and given consent? 2. Is the patient mentally capable and legally competent, and is there evidence of incapacity? 3. If mentally capable, what preferences about treatment is the patient stating? 4. If incapacitated, has the patient expressed prior preferences? 5. Who is the appropriate surrogate to make decisions for the incapacitated patient? 6. Is the patient unwilling or unable to cooperate with medical treatment? If so, why? Quality of Life: The Principles of Beneficence and Nonmaleficence and Respect for Autonomy 1. What are the prospects, with or without treatment, for a return to normal life, and what physical, mental, and social deficits might the patient experience even if treatment succeeds? 2. On what grounds can anyone judge that some quality of life would be undesirable for a patient who cannot make or express such a judgment? 3. Are there biases that might prejudice the provider’s evaluation of the patient’s quality of life? 4. What ethical issues arise concerning improving or enhancing a patient’s quality of life? 5. Do quality-of-life assessments raise any questions regarding changes in treatment plans, such as forgoing life-sustaining treatment? 6. What are plans and rationale to forgo life-sustaining treatment? 7. What is the legal and ethical status of suicide? Contextual Features: The Principles of Justice and Fairness 1. Are there professional, interprofessional, or business interests that might create conflicts of interest in the clinical treatment of patients? 2. Are there parties other than clinicians and patients, such as family members, who have an interest in clinical decisions? 3. What are the limits imposed on patient confidentiality by the legitimate interests of third parties? 4. Are there financial factors that create conflicts of interest in clinical decisions? 5. Are there problems of allocation of scarce health resources that might affect clinical decisions? 6. Are there religious issues that might influence clinical decisions? 7. What are the legal issues that might affect clinical decisions? 8. Are there considerations of clinical research and education that might affect clinical decisions? 9. Are there issues of public health and safety that affect clinical decisions? 10. Are there conflicts of interest within institutions and organizations (e.g., hospitals) that may affect clinical decisions and patient welfare?

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 50
Use the following coupon code :
NPS10
Order Now

The post Case Assignment: Patient’s Quality of Life appeared first on NursingPaperSlayers.

hypothetical roundtable discussion between three representatives from three different historical era

Using only primary texts provided to you, your task is to set up a hypothetical round table discussion in which your three representatives debate what The Happy Life entails. The dialogue may be either argumentative, agreeable, or both, but the discussion should reflect that you have properly interpreted the primary documents in developing the positions of your debate representatives.
Must include the following 3 people from the following eras:
CategoryA (Pre-classical) Solomon
Category B (Classical) Socrates
Category C (Post-classical) Boethius

The post hypothetical roundtable discussion between three representatives from three different historical era appeared first on Savvy Essay Writers.

Young adult gynecology

Presentation pregnancy 20-45 (nursing)
Order Description
Womens Health Assessment 1Part 1
Overview of Womens Health Assessment Assignments
There are three womens health assessment assignments in this course. They occur in Weeks 3 7 and 9. Each of these assignments has two parts. Part 1 is a presentation of information in the Discussion Area. Part 2 is a written report. For these assignments you will select your own clients (one for each assignment) from the following categories:
Assessment 1: Young adult gynecology (<25 years of age [YOA]) Assessment 2: Pregnancy (2045 YOA) Assessment 3: Gynecology and the older women (>40 YOA)
Be sure to ask your clients permission to be contacted after the visit if needed in order to complete the assignment.
Click here to view the format that should be used to construct your assignment.
Assignment Instructions for Part 1
Your focus for this assignment should be on young adult gynecology (<25 YOA). Select a client from one of the following age categories: a. 1315 b. 1618 c. 1924 d. 2535 (Although this weeks focus is on patients <25 YOA this category is included to provide an opportunity to address age and smoking impact on contraceptive selection.) Some examples of topics you might select from include STDs unintended pregnancies diverse cultural issues premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). Remember to include health promotion and disease prevention where applicable with all presentations and patient counseling. Use the format defined above to present your patient in this Discussion Area. In addition tell the class about your approach and patient care. Use published articles to support your approach. Tuesday August 25 2015. Assignment 3 Grading Criteria Maximum Points Selected an approved focused topic area. 2 Presented the patient case in the assigned format. 3 Clearly and thoroughly presented the diagnoses and patient care. 3 Cited at least one published article to support the approach. 2 Total: 10

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get a Discount!

The post Young adult gynecology appeared first on Premium Academic Affiliates.

Social, Ethical and Legal Implications For Instagram

Assess in a maximum of 700 words the ethical, legal, and social issues affecting your product or service in two markets: the United States and one international market. Domestic market generally means the market where the company headquarters are located. If you choose a domestic market that is not the U.S., then your other market …

Social, Ethical and Legal Implications For Instagram Read More »