Application of Information from the March of Dimes

Science

Initial discussion response should be in the range of 300 words. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of 2 scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).

  1. Access a nationally recognized professional practice resource such as AAP, AAFP, AWHONN, March of Dimes, CDC, etc. Review guidelines for prenatal testing, prenatal assessments, or maternal fetal outcomes related to prenatal care. AS an FNP please answer the following. What information did you find that influenced your awareness of prenatal testing and prenatal care? What information will you utilize when you provide care for a woman who is pregnant or planning a pregnancy?

Kitchen by Banana Yoshimoto analysis

Humanities

use evidence(quotes) from the book KITCHEN by Banana Yoshimoto for every body paragraph.

Begin to answer your focus question, and find and write out at least two short passages from Kitchen that you might use in your upcoming paper as you hone your answer, your thesis statement.

This week, you have been asked to compose as complete a rough draft as possible; that is, as close to the five-page requirement so that you get feedback on an entire piece. Be sure to include at least two direct quotations from Kitchen, as well as analysis of each of them and how they relate to your thesis. I put ‘analysis’ in bold because it is a crucial element of a critical thinking paper of any kind – in this case, literature.

DBA8100 WALDEN Strategies For Night Audit Of Employees In The Hotel Industry

Other

See session plan attached

By Day 7

Submit the initial draft of your three subsections to your Chair for review. Each component must map to the Doctoral Study Rubric and include proper APA format and style. Throughout the rest of this course, you will finalize these three components and make necessary revisions based on feedback from your Chair.

Note: Be sure to use the DBA Doctoral Study Template to complete this Assignment. Refer to the Week 2 Assignment Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this rubric to assess your work.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 1 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 1 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Rubic

Element 1: Doctoral Study Components—


140
(70%) points

Student presents a thorough and detailed submission of the agreed upon component(s) from the Session Plan. Submission fully addresses all the components on the Doctoral Study rubric related to his/her Session Plan.

133 (66.5%) points

Student presents a thorough and detailed submission of the agreed upon component(s) from the Session Plan. Submission fully addresses all the components on the Doctoral Study rubric related to his/her Session Plan; however, there is minor feedback to address to more fully align and/or address the components. See paper for specific feedback.

119 (59.5%) points

Student presents his/her submission of the agreed upon component(s) from the Session Plan. Submission mostly addresses the components on the Doctoral Study rubric related to his/her Session Plan; however some revisions are necessary. See paper for specific feedback.

105 (52.5%) points

Student does not present all the agreed upon components from the Session Plan and/or does not address the majority of the components from the Doctoral Study rubric. Major revisions are needed. See paper for specific feedback.

70 (35%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Element 2: Written Delivery Style & Grammar—


30
(15%) points

Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are no spelling or grammar errors.

28.5 (14.25%) points

Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are one or two minor errors in spelling or grammar.

25.5 (12.75%) points

Student mostly follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are some errors in spelling or grammar.

22.5 (11.25%) points

Student does not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style and does not communicate in a cohesive, logical style.

15 (7.5%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

Element 3: Formal and Appropriate Documentation of Evidence, Attribution of Ideas (APA Citations)—


30
(15%) points

Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are no APA errors.

28.5 (14.25%) points

Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are one or two minor errors in APA style or format.

25.5 (12.75%) points

Student mostly adheres to scholarly reference requirements and/or mostly adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Some errors in APA format and style are evident.

22.5 (11.25%) points

Student demonstrates weak or inconsistent adherence scholarly reference requirements and/or weak or inconsistent adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Several errors in APA format and style are evident.

15 (7.5%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

thank you for your time

Humanities

Discuss the issue of immigration restriction in both the 1920s and today. What should American immigration policy attempt to achieve?

references can only come from the book

Liberty, Equality, Power: A History of the American People, Volume 2: Since 1863 7th Edition