unit 66

Case Scenario

Emily is an 18-month-old toddler developing typically. She attends a for-profit childcare center full-time. Emily’s parents are divorced and she lives half-time with each parent. She has two older brothers, ages 6 and 10. Emily’s father is a plumber and her mother is a cashier at a local grocery store. Emily has begun biting other children at the childcare center. You have just been assigned to act as the lead educator in her classroom. The assistant is concerned about Emily’s biting and so are some of the parents of the other children, as she has left bite marks on two children, though the skin was not broken. During your first day in the classroom, you observe the following:

Emily is playing alone with a doll. Janesta, who is 23 months old, walks over to Emily and takes the doll Emily was playing with. Emily then bites Janesta on the arm. You swiftly pick Emily up and tell her, “We don’t bite,” and hold her in your lap for a few minutes. Then she runs to play with blocks.

Later in the day, you witness Emily walk up to a boy in the class and bite him on the shoulder, without any apparent provocation. The assistant quickly picks Emily up and moves her to the reading area and reads her a book. Emily stays there for 10 minutes, quietly turning pages.

 

Part 1: ABC Analysis Chart

You will use the case scenario above to develop a hypothesis as to what is the likely function of the

 

A=Antecedent. What happened immediately before the behavior? Was there any event or activity that preceded the behavior?

B=Behavior. The behavior should be defined in observable, objective terms.

C=Consequence. What happened immediately following the behavior?

Function of behavior = this is your hypothesis. Using what you have learned about behavior, what is the most likely function? Is the child trying to get something, and if so, what? This could be tangibles such as access to a toy, a preferred activity or even attention. Is the child trying to escape from something, and if so, what? This could be escape from an unwanted task such as cleaning up toys.

 

Part 2: Behavior Change Chart

For Part 2, using your hypothesis and the information from your ABC chart, fill out the template in DocSharing and manipulate variables to determine if your hypothesis is correct in order to pick the best course of action to take with Emily. You can only manipulate one variable at a time in order to determine what would be most effective in modifying Emily’s behavior. First you will manipulate the antecedent. When you changed the antecedent (A), what do you predict will happen and why? If you do not get the desired behavior change (B), then you need to try manipulating another variable. In this case, you will then manipulate the consequence (C). What do you predict will happen with the behavior (B) and why?

Submit your completed project to the Unit 6: Project Dropbox. If you need help using the Dropbox, see the Dropbox Guide located in the Academic Tools tab.

 

ID: CE300-06-10-A

.awasam-promo {
background-color: #9ED5EA;
color: white;
text-align: center;
padding: 10px;
}

.button {
background-color: #4CAF50;
border: none;
color: white;
padding: 10px 20px;
text-align: center;
text-decoration: none;
display: inline-block;
font-size: 16px;
margin: 4px 2px;
cursor: pointer;
border-radius: 10px;
}

.awasam-alert {
color: red;
}

“Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us”
Use the following coupon
FIRST15

Order Now

The post unit 66 appeared first on Savvy Essay Writers.

Due Tuesday April 1 at 7 pm, Free of Plagiarism

The “boiled frog” phenomenon is a business term of significance to business in general and to strategic management in particular. Based on your research, please describe how this phenomenon applies to business and particularly to strategic management?

Share a specific business/company example; discuss the particular situation where the Boiled Frog phenomenon occurred. What reason(s) do you attribute this particular phenomenon to? What could the business have done to avoid the effects of the phenomenon? 4 and half pages 

 

.awasam-promo {
background-color: #9ED5EA;
color: white;
text-align: center;
padding: 10px;
}

.button {
background-color: #4CAF50;
border: none;
color: white;
padding: 10px 20px;
text-align: center;
text-decoration: none;
display: inline-block;
font-size: 16px;
margin: 4px 2px;
cursor: pointer;
border-radius: 10px;
}

.awasam-alert {
color: red;
}

“Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us”
Use the following coupon
FIRST15

Order Now

The post Due Tuesday April 1 at 7 pm, Free of Plagiarism appeared first on Savvy Essay Writers.

Introduction to sociology

Objectives

Define human nature and factors that affect human nature
Describe sociological interactions in everyday life and the factors that affect them
Review the information in the lesson on socialization and nature versus nurture.  Chose the side of the debate that you believe has the greatest effect on human nature. Do some research online to support your opinion.

Is there a lot of information to support your side of the debate?
Is there more or less information to support the other side?
Write a paper in which you support the nature or nurture side of the debate.

Do innate qualities or socialization ultimately shape who we become?
What information did you find which best supports your theory?
Use information and terminology from the lesson to support your claim as well.

Compare and contrast both the Theory of Bureaucratic Caring and the Theory of Successful Aging

Compare and contrast both the Theory of Bureaucratic Caring and the Theory of Successful Aging, making sure to identify important similarities and key differences in their assumptions and definition of metaparadigms. Select one of the two theories and analyze how it correlates to one of the AACN Masters Essentials.

Use at least 2 references in APA forma

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient”for a 15% Discount!”

We have Walden University and Capella University nursing practitioners!


Buy Custom Nursing Papers