SOCW-6301-6500-WK8-Discussions

Discussion 1: Methods of Measuring

 

The center point of research studies is the body of data collected to answer the research question. These data must be measured, which is the act of sorting them out and quantifying them in some cohesive way in order to construct meaning—but how can you measure something that is not quantifiable? For example, how would you measure a phenomenon? How would you measure the feelings of adolescents in a certain situation? For this Discussion, choose one phenomenon, or abstract concept, and think about how it can be operationally defined and measured. What method and instrument could you use to measure it?

 

Choose a phenomenon (love, anger, compassion, or something similar) and suggest a method and an instrument for measuring it. Create a question or set of questions that operationalize the concept. Then provide explanations for the following questions:

·      What level of measurement applies to your proposed measure?
 
·      How did you determine whether the questions and response options are both reliable and valid?

 ·      How would you collect the data (in person, telephone, mail)? Individually or in groups? Self-administered or researcher-administered?

 

Please use 2 or more resources to support your answers.

 

References

 

Yegidis, B. L., Weinbach, R. W., & Myers, L. L. (2012). Research methods for social workers (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon.

 

Brosi, E. (2011). Table 1.2: Academic/educational attitudes and values. In Measurement tools for evaluating out-of-school time programs: An evaluation resource. Retrieved from http://www.hfrp.org/publications-resources/browse-our-publications/measurement-tools-for-evaluating-out-of-school-time-programs-an-evaluation-resource2#table1-2.

 

Windle, G., Bennett, K. M., & Noyes, J. (2011). A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Retrieved from http://www.hqlo.com/content/pdf/1477-7525-9-8.pdf

 

Walker, K. E., & Arbreton, A. J. A. (2001). Working together to build Beacon Centers in San Francisco: Evaluation findings from 1998–2000. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures. (see pp. 96-99 for measures). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED464212.pdf

 

 

 

Discussion 2: Use of Existing Measures

One of the best ways to learn is to critique the work of others. For this week’s Discussion 2, choose an instrument used in one of the research studies listed in the resources for this week or from a research study that relates to the concept you proposed to measure in Discussion 1. Consider how you would compare your original measurement to the existing measurement.

 

·      Post a brief explanation of your chosen research study and the measurement instrument used.
 
·      Then, compare your original measurement approach to the existing instrument.
 
·      Next, explain how you would revise or replace your original measurement plan.

 ·      Finally explain the advantages and/or disadvantages of using existing instruments for measurement.

 

Please use 2 or more resources to support your answers.

 

References

 

Yegidis, B. L., Weinbach, R. W., & Myers, L. L. (2012). Research methods for social workers (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon.

 

Brosi, E. (2011). Table 1.2: Academic/educational attitudes and values. In Measurement tools for evaluating out-of-school time programs: An evaluation resource. Retrieved from http://www.hfrp.org/publications-resources/browse-our-publications/measurement-tools-for-evaluating-out-of-school-time-programs-an-evaluation-resource2#table1-2.

 

Windle, G., Bennett, K. M., & Noyes, J. (2011). A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Retrieved from http://www.hqlo.com/content/pdf/1477-7525-9-8.pdf

 

Walker, K. E., & Arbreton, A. J. A. (2001). Working together to build Beacon Centers in San Francisco: Evaluation findings from 1998–2000. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures. (see pp. 96-99 for measures). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED464212.pdf

 

 

Discussion 3: Blog

Refer to the topics covered in this week’s resources and incorporate them into your blog.

Post a blog post that includes:

 

·      An explanation of the use of self during your field education experience that you may have encountered or that you might encounter

 ·      A description of potential boundary challenges in your field education experience at a military mental health clinic

 

References (use 2 or more)

 

Garthwait, C. (2012). The social work practicum: A guide and workbook for students (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

 

Ganzer, C. (2007). The use of self from a relational perspective. Clinical Social Work Journal, 35(2), 117–123.

 

Osteen, P. J. (2011). Motivations, values, and conflict resolution: Students’ integration of personal and professional identities. Journal of Social Work Education, 47(3), 423–444.

 

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get a Discount! Use Coupon Code “Newclient”

The post SOCW-6301-6500-WK8-Discussions appeared first on Savvy Essay Writers.

Aspects of NIMS training

Students will write a research paper based on one of the topics below. The paper should include an
overview of the subject and major relevant points relative to economic, social and/or legal implications or
impacts. Moreover, the paper should incorporate the role of the Saint Leo University core value of
Community as it relates to local response to terrorism (e.g., mutual aid agreements, regionalization
approaches, multi-jurisdictional training or exercises, cross-discipline training or exercises, interoperable
The paper has a required minimum length of 2500 words and must conform to APA style and formatting.
This includes a running head, page numbers, cover page, abstract, introduction, body, summary of
findings, conclusion, in-text citations, and reference page. Non-APA formatted papers will receive an
automatic 25 point reduction.
A minimum of five references are required, with no more than two from Internet sources. Additional
grading criteria will include clarity of presentation, quality of content, mastery of content, care and
attention to detail, organization, originality of presentation, and the value and interest of the presentation,
as well as proper grammar and punctuation. A grading rubric is available in the course Doc Sharing
section.
The assignment must be your original work. You are required to use no more than 15% of others quoted
work when completing any assignments within this course of study. Your research paper must therefore
be 85% original.

examine your understanding of concepts

1ACC00712 Essay 2020 S1Word limit: 2,000 wordsDue date: 5pm Friday, 22th May 2020The due date is extended for 7 days. […]

Journal Artical Review (2)

 

Journal Article Review Instructions

 

Articles

 

During this course, you will write formal reviews on 2 online articles. During Module/Week 3, you will review the following article:

 

“The Origin of Old-Earth Geology and its Ramifications for Life in the 21st Century” by Terry Mortenson at http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/tj/v18/n1/old-earth-geology.

 

Then, during Module/Week 5, you will review the following article:

 

“East Africa’s Great Rift Valley: A Complex Rift System” by James Wood and Alex Guth at http://geology.com/articles/east-africa-rift.shtml.

 

 

 

Content

 

In general, each Journal Article Review must contain an introductory paragraph, the body of the work, and a conclusion. In terms of the body, the following items must be discussed:

 

1.      Brief overview of the theme of the article and its main points.

 

2.      Strengths of the article. Answer questions such as:

 

a.       What did the author do well?

 

b.      Were any points made exceptionally clear?

 

c.       Did the author write with concision and precision?

 

3.      Weaknesses of the article. Answer questions such as:

 

a.       What erroneous assumptions does the author make, if any?

 

b.      Are any factual errors made in the article?

 

c.       Is the scientific method violated in any way?

 

d.      Could the author have stated his/her case better?

 

4.      Remember, every article has weaknesses. You are expected to discuss some of these. Failure to identify any weaknesses in your Journal Article Reviews will negatively affect your grade.

 

 

 

Outline

 

Use the following outline when writing your papers. Each point on the below outline must be a separate section (with a section heading) within each of your Journal Article Reviews. You will notice that these section headings correspond to the content points above.

 

I.                   Introduction

 

II.                Brief Overview and Main Points

 

III.             Article Strengths

 

IV.             Article Weaknesses

 

V.                Conclusion

 

 


Length

 

These reviews are to be 2–3 pages each. Do not exceed this page limit. The title page and bibliography do not count toward this page total.

 

 

 

Format

 

You must use current APA formatting. Papers must be double-spaced with 1-inch margins all around. The font is to be Courier New or Times New Roman, 12-point. Include a cover sheet with your name, instructor’s name, course number and title, date, and paper title. There is no need to include an abstract in your paper. Current APA formatting rules can be found at the following site: http://www.liberty.edu/media/2108/apa.pdf.

 

 

 

Sources

 

The only source required for each review is the article itself. However, feel free to incorporate other sources if you so desire. Additional sources must be limited to journal articles, manuscripts, scholarly textbooks, and/or internet sites from .edu or .gov sources. Avoid internet sites from .com, .net, .org, etc. sources as the information contained therein are not often peer-reviewed. Also, Study Bibles are not appropriate for this assignment. List all of your sources in a bibliography at the end of the paper.

 

 

 

Citation

 

Be sure to cite your sources in the body of your paper using proper APA formatting. APA formatting rules can be found at the following site: http://www.liberty.edu/media/2108/apa.pdf.

 

 

 

Plagiarism

 

Plagiarism is a serious academic infringement. Avoid it at all costs. To learn more about plagiarism and how to avoid it, visit http://www.liberty.edu/informationservices/ilrc/library/index.cfm?PID=20123. Note that you are fully responsible for any plagiarism detected by the instructor of this course. Cases of plagiarism will be dealt with according to current policies established by Liberty University Online.

 

 

 

Journal Article Review 1 is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 3 and Journal Article Review 2 is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 5.

 

 

 

 

 

.awasam-promo {
background-color: #9ED5EA;
color: white;
text-align: center;
padding: 10px;
}

.button {
background-color: #4CAF50;
border: none;
color: white;
padding: 10px 20px;
text-align: center;
text-decoration: none;
display: inline-block;
font-size: 16px;
margin: 4px 2px;
cursor: pointer;
border-radius: 10px;
}

.awasam-alert {
color: red;
}

“Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us”
Use the following coupon
FIRST15

Order Now

The post Journal Artical Review (2) appeared first on Savvy Essay Writers.