Natural Science

This assignment gives you the opportunity to explore ethical perspectives in film. In 500-600 words, please consider the three primary ethical schools we have explored in the class: virtue ethics, teleological, and deontological ethics. Choose a film, and then identify the primary school of thought that is best reflected in the film. This activity aligns with module outcomes 1, 3 and 5.Content Requirements:Specifically refer to at least two scenes in the film as evidence for the school of thought that is best reflected in the film.Quote dialogue from the film and provide some context for the scenes you’re discussing and analyzing.Remember to discuss why the other two schools may not strictly apply to the film. Or perhaps you can argue that the two other schools are present in some of the decisions or actions of some minor characters, but they do not necessarily dominate the film.Speculate as to why a specific ethical school dominates this film. Does the topic lend itself to the particular ethical view? Does the setting or historical period of the film lend itself to a certain ethical view? Has the director stated or implied what was ethically important when he or she made the film?Read and quote from 2 movie reviews and your readings to help clarify or support any of your ideas.Writing Requirements: Develop an interesting introduction which includes an evident thesis.Logically organize your ideas, ensuring that there are transitions between each paragraph.Use proper grammar and syntaxUse detail, dialogue , and description to support your ideas.Use direct quotations from the movie review and your readings, using APA citation style

WE ALL KNOW CLASSWORK IS BORING. THUS, OUR ESSAY HELP SERVICE EXISTS TO HELP STUDENTS WHO ARE OVERWHELMED WITH STUDIES. ORDER YOUR CUSTOM PAPER FOR 20% DISCOUNT. USE CODE SAVE20

Source link

Natural Science was first posted on August 2, 2020 at 5:41 am.
©2020 "My Assignment Geek". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at savvyessaywriters@gmail.com

DNP 825 Case Report

DNP 825 Week 6 Case Report GCU

DNP 825 Week 6 Case Report: Application of Public Health Concepts for the Uninsured

Details:

In this assignment, learners are required to write a case report addressing the personal knowledge and skills gained in this course and potentially solving an identified practice problem.

General Guidelines:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions:

Construct a 2,500-3,000 word (approximately 10-12 pages) case report that includes a problem or situation consistent with a DNP area of practice.

  1. Review the IOM and Kaiser Commission Report on the uninsured to develop the case report.
  2. Apply public health concepts to describe understanding of the problem or situation of focus.
  3. Apply one or more public health concepts to the recommended intervention or solution being proposed.
  4. Develop the case report across the entire scenario from the identification of the clinical or health care problem through the proposal for an intervention, implementation, and evaluation using an appropriate research instrument.
  5. Describe the evaluation of the selected research instrument in the case report.
  6. Lastly, explain in full the tenets, rationale for selection (empirical evidence), and clear application using the language of public health concepts within the case report.

Case Report Requirements:

In addition, your case report must include the following:

  1. Introduction with a problem statement.
  2. Brief literature review.
  3. Description of the case/situation/conditions explained from a theoretical perspective.
  4. Discussion that includes a detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings.
  5. Summary of the case.
  6. Proposed solutions to remedy gaps, inefficiencies, or other issues from a theoretical approach.
  7. Identification of a research instrument to evaluate the proposed solution along with a description of how the instrument could be evaluated.
  8. Conclusion.

Portfolio Practice Hours:

Practice immersion assignments are based on your current course objectives, and are intended to be application-based learning using your real-world practice setting. These assignments earn practice immersion hours, and are indicated in the assignment by a Portfolio Practice Hours statement that reminds you, the learner, to enter a corresponding case log in Typhon. Actual clock hours are entered, but the average hours associated with each practice immersion assignment is 10.

You are required to complete your assignment using real-world application. Real-world application requires the use of evidence-based data, contemporary theories, and concepts presented in the course. The culmination of your assignment must present a viable application in a current practice setting. For more information on parameters for practice immersion hours, please refer to DNP resources in the DC Network.

To earn portfolio practice hours, enter the following after the references section of your paper:

Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-825

I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have also tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.

Case Report: Application of Public Health Concepts for the Uninsured  

  1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%		 2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%		 3
Satisfactory
79.00%		 4
Good
87.00%		 5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content  
5.0 %Introduction and Problem Statement An introduction with problem statement is not present. An introduction with problem statement is present but incomplete. An introduction with problem statement is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. An introduction with problem statement is present, clear, and thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. An introduction with problem statement is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
5.0 %Brief Literature Review A brief literature review is not present. A brief literature review is present but incomplete. A brief literature review is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. A brief literature review is clearly present in full. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A brief literature review is clearly present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Description of the Case, Situation, or Conditions Explained from a Theoretical Perspective A description of the case, situation, or conditions from a theoretical perspective is not present. A description of the case, situation, or conditions from a theoretical perspective is present but incomplete. A description of the case, situation, or conditions from a theoretical perspective is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. A description of the case, situation, or conditions from a theoretical perspective is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A description of the case, situation, or conditions from a theoretical perspective is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Discussion Includes a Detailed Explanation of the Synthesized Literature Findings A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is not present. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is present but incomplete. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is present but incomplete. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Case Summary A case summary is not present. A case summary is present but incomplete. A case summary is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. A case summary is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A case summary is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Proposed Solutions to Remedy Identified Gaps, Inefficiencies, or Other Issues from a Theoretical Approach Proposed solutions from a theoretical approach are not presented. Proposed solutions from a theoretical approach are presented but are incomplete. Proposed solutions from a theoretical approach are presented but are rendered at a perfunctory level. Proposed solutions from a theoretical approach are clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Proposed solutions from a theoretical approach are clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Identification of a Research Instrument to Evaluate the Proposed Solution along with a Description of how the Instrument could be Evaluated Identification of a research instrument to evaluate the proposed solution along with a description of how the instrument could be evaluated is not present. Identification of a research instrument to evaluate the proposed solution along with a description of how the instrument could be evaluated is presented but is incomplete. Identification of a research instrument to evaluate the proposed solution along with a description of how the instrument could be evaluated is presented but is rendered at a perfunctory level. Identification of a research instrument to evaluate the proposed solution along with a description of how the instrument could be evaluated is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Identification of a research instrument to evaluate the proposed solution along with a description of how the instrument could be evaluated is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Conclusion A conclusion is not presented. A conclusion is presented but is incomplete. A conclusion is presented but is rendered at a perfunctory level. A conclusion is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A conclusion is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness  
7.0…

Fluoride is often added to water as sodium fluoride (NaF). What is the mass percent composition of F in NaF?

Fluoride is often added to water as sodium fluoride (NaF). What is the mass percent composition of F− in NaF? How many grams of NaF must be added to 1500 L of water to fluoridate it at a level of 1.0 mg F−/L?

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get a Discount!

The post Fluoride is often added to water as sodium fluoride (NaF). What is the mass percent composition of F in NaF? appeared first on Premium Academic Affiliates.

critical reflection posts

At the undergraduate-level university experience, there have been few activities that can be more beneficial to reading and individual reflection to determine student success. It is so important that you keep up with readings and employ strong reading skills. At two points within the course, you will be expected to pair a reading with a relevant example in the mass media and connect this to what you have learned about a theory, subject/topic discussed in the course. Each writing reflection should be written in a personal journal style and posted to the discussion forum on Brightspace. It should include hyperlinks to the article you are reflecting on and a proper APA reference to the chapter in the text that you are referencing. These articles should not exceed approximately 500 words. The goal of this exercise will be to ensure you are getting the most from your reading and for you to begin appreciating the media while thinking critically about current issues and events.

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient”for a 15% Discount!”

We have Walden University and Capella University nursing practitioners!


Buy Custom Nursing Papers