Examine and evaluate decision making systems and techniques to engage group decisions and analyse how these can enhance sustainable outcomes

a) Select and evaluate the usefulness of a range of decision making tools and reflect on your decisionmaking styles and […]

learning theories 3

***Template Provided

***Grading Rubric must be followed

***USE JOURNAL TEMPLATE TO COMPLETE

***Provide 3 Theories and I will provide the peer reviewed research journal articles to you

Identify 2–3 theories that serve as the basis of strategies, practices, or techniques that are designed to support the instructional needs of students. Then, using the Schools Teaching and Learning Guide, search for and read a total of six peer-reviewed research journal articles that either test those theories or examine some aspect of those theories. You will find that many of these theories are the basis of models currently used in various learning settings. Analyze these theories and determine how they translate into instructional models that support the needs of learners and are used in discipline-specific content. In your analysis, determine what instructional model may be a direct outcome of your chosen theory.

Use the following questions to guide your analysis of each article. This is not a short answer assignment, but rather a response that summarizes the key points of an article.

  • What theories provide a basis for a model that supports student learning?
  • What are the strengths and/or limitations of this model?
  • What evidence within the literature supports the effectiveness of this model?
  • How does this model support diverse learners?
  • How does this model support discipline-specific content?
  • What varying settings can this model be applied to?

RESOURCES

  • Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371–384.
  • Thurlings, M. M., Vermeulen, M., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, P. (2013). Understanding feedback : A learning theory perspective. Educational Research Review, 9, 1–15.
  • Orland-Barak, L., & Yinon, H. (2007). When theory meets practice: What student teachers learn from guided reflection on their own classroom discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 957–969.
  • DifferenceBetween.net. (2011, July 15). Difference between models and theories. Retrieved from http://www.differencebetween.net/language/words-la…
  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.
  • Glasser, W. (1997). “Choice theory” and student success. The Education Digest, 63(3), 16–21.
  • Skinner, B. F. (1950). Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review, 57(4), 193–216.
  • Cambourne, B. (2001). Conditions for literacy learning: Turning learning theory into classroom instruction: A minicase study. The Reading Teacher, 54(4), 414–417.
  • Cundill, G., D. J. Roux, and J. N. Parker. (2015). Nurturing communities of practice for transdisciplinary research. Ecology and Society, 20(2), 22.

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient”for a 15% Discount!”

We have Walden University and Capella University nursing practitioners!


Buy Custom Nursing Papers

weekly journal 4 help please

300 – 500 words

    1. What approach/profession do you trust most, when the objective is to change social injustices? Why?
    2. Are there particular individuals, articles, historical events, etc. that influenced this trust?
    3. What individual actions can you take in order to contribute towards changes you are most passionate about?

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient”for a 15% Discount!”


Buy Custom Nursing Papers

The post weekly journal 4 help please appeared first on Student Homeworks.

Discussion 1: Malpractice, law homework help

Discussion 1: Malpractice”

  • Part A: Discuss why the Indiana court In Vergara vs. Doan, at 593 N.E. 2d 185 (Ind. 1992) and at p. 435 of your textbook decided to replace the modified locality rule in favor of adopting the national standard rule re: the standard of care at applicable to doctors in determining liability in medical malpractice cases.
  • Part B: Give your opinion on what standard of care is appropriate for doctors who provide patient advice over the internet and telephone to patients in any, or all, of the 50 states?

If you need help with completing discussions please click here for more information.

  • [img alt=”” src=”https://www.studypool.com/images/ci/icons/generic_updown.gif”>

    “Discussion 2: Professionals”

    • Part A: Describe the “trial within a trial” method of determining damages caused by a lawyer’s malpractice. See Fishman v. Brooks at 487 N.E.2d 1377 (Mass. 1986) and at p. 460 of your textbook.

      In this case, Fishman charged attorney Brooks with legal malpractice for urging that Fishman settle, when in fact the attorney was not prepared for trial, and for mistakenly representing that driver’s insurance policy limits were $250,000. Brooks urged Fishman to settle for $160,000 when the policy limits were, in fact, $1,000,000.00.

      Assuming the hypothetical facts that you knew that this single successful malpractice action had happened 20 years ago, while this attorney was going through a personal divorce, would you trust him to handle a traffic accident in which you were involved?

    • Part B: The court in Carbone v. Tierney at 864 A. 2d 308 (N.H. 2004) and at p. 464, discusses the requirements for a plaintiff to collect on a malpractice claim against an attorney.

      That is, this court decided that to successfully prove that the lawyer’s malfeasance was the proximate cause of plaintiff’s loss, he would have to demonstrate two (2) things. First, that if the defendant would have performed adequately, and then the plaintiff would have succeeded on the merits in the underlying case. And second, that the plaintiff would have succeeded in collecting on the resultant judgment.

      This means that if the attorney can prove that the judgment, if won, would not have been collectible, then this uncollectability is a complete defense to the malpractice action and the plaintiff receives nothing.

      Give your opinion on whether or not you believe collectability should be a complete defense to legal malpractice actions. Provide a rationale for your response.