assignment 1413

On April 18, 2016, The United States Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari (refused to review the lower court’s ruling) in the case of Authors Guild v. Google, Inc., 804 F. 3d 202 – Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2015.

That case let stand the ruling of the Court of Appeals which can be found at the following

website
:

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2220742578695593916&q=Authors+Guild+v.+Google+Inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4000006 last accessed July 9, 2016.

https://www.authorsguild.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Authors-Guild-v.-Google-Petition-no-appendix.pdf last accessed July 9, 2016.

Please write a 600-word summary of fair use as this court decision says it.

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient”for a 15% Discount!”

We have Walden University and Capella University nursing practitioners!


Buy Custom Nursing Papers

Tax and Business Decision essay

Other

JIM is considering implementing a 401K program for its employees. The program plan will include the company matching at 50% of the employee’s contribution up to 6% contribution. The Human Resources manager proposing this plan feels it will reduce turnover, improve morale, and provide a competitive edge when recruiting new employees. The HR manager has estimated JIM’s annual contribution to be $300,000 and the savings to be $70,000 in employee turnover costs and improved performance. Management is concerned about this additional cost.

  • Explain the 401 K limits and special treatment for highly-compensated employees.
  • Document how, as a tax analyst, you see this program.
  • Document what, if any, will be the tax implications of this program.

Assessing Hearing Conservation Program Effectiveness

Other

  1. OSHA has identified seven elements for an effective hearning conservation program (HCP) (https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/1992-08-04). The textbook discusses five basic elements. What elements have been required by OSHA but not being included in the textbook?
  2. How to assess the effectiveness of HCPs?
  3. Read the attached paper “Assessing Hearing Conservation Program Effectiveness: Results of a Multisite Assessment” (https://oce.ovid.com/article/00043764-201801000-00006/HTML), discuss in your own words why management commitment is important for hearing conservation program?

PSY 699 Ethics of Mandated Treatment discussion

Humanities

You have been called in to consult on cases that may require mandated treatment. After reviewing the PSY699 The ethics of mandated treatment scenarios , choose two to discuss in your initial post. Begin your research with the required resources for this week. Using the specific situations presented in each of the scenarios you have chosen, conduct further research to help inform your recommendations for each individual. A minimum of one resource per scenario, beyond those already required for the assignment, must be included in your initial post.

In your post, construct clear and concise arguments using evidence-based psychological concepts and theories to present your recommendations as to whether or not treatment should be mandated for the individuals in each of the scenarios. As you write your recommendations, be certain to provide insights into the following questions.

  • What are the ethical principles and implications raised by legally mandating clients into treatment?
  • What evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of treatment with and without coercion for this type of situation?
  • What would be the challenges in evaluating the effectiveness of mandated treatment?
  • How might mandated treatment impact your clinical decision making as the mental health professional assigned to these cases?

What client factors might limit or augment the potential benefits of treatment if it were mandated?

Integrating concepts from your research and the required readings, offer insights across different content domains as to why you have reached these conclusions. Explain how you used the APA Ethical Code of Conduct to guide your decisions. Evaluate the generalizability of your specific research findings to the situations presented and provide a rationale as to why this research supports your recommendations.

Scenarios

Scenario 1: A client with a well-established history of repeated dangerous behavior and inpatient commitment has been treated, stabilized, and discharged into the community. The treating psychiatrist believes that the client’s success in the community is far more likely if treatment is continued. However, the client wishes to terminate treatment. A request for mandated treatment is filed by the psychiatrist with the court. During the hearing, the psychiatrist testifies that while the client is not imminently dangerous, he potentially could become dangerous again without treatment.

Scenario 2: A long-term client appeared quite excited during a recent session with her therapist. Speaking rapidly, she told the therapist that she was planning a gambling trip that would win her millions of dollars. After some probing, the therapist learned the client had recently stopped taking the medication prescribed for her bipolar disorder because she had been feeling so happy. The client also indicated that she no longer saw a need for therapy and was planning to stop treatment.