Programming

At the University of the Cumberlands, it is a priority that students are provided with strong educational programs and courses that allow them to be servant-leaders in their disciplines and communities, linking research with practice and knowledge with ethical decision-making. This assignment is a written assignment where students will demonstrate how this course research has connected and put into practice within their career.

Assignment

Provide a reflection of at least two pages double spaced (without bullet points) of how the knowledge, skills, or theories of this course have been applied or could be applied, in a practical manner to your current work environment. If you are not currently working, share times when you have or could observe these theories and knowledge could be applied to an employment opportunity in your field of study.

Requirements

Provide at least two pages double spaced (without bullet points) minimum reflection. Use of proper APA formatting and citations. If supporting evidence from outside resources is used those must be properly cited. Share a personal connection that identifies specific knowledge and theories from this course. Demonstrate a connection to your current work environment. If you are not employed, demonstrate a connection to your desired work environment. You should NOT provide an overview of the assignments assigned in the course. The assignment asks that you reflect how the knowledge and skills obtained through meeting course objectives were applied or could be applied in the workplace. Cite accordingly, and your SA score should not be more than 30%.

Science

I had never heard of this case, this is very interesting. It absolutely amazes me that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) was willing to risk the already increased chances of aircraft hijacking due to budget constraints.

The ruling was a very interesting. I have always considered the words law, rule, and regulation to be one in the same concerning government, however this ruling seems to change that. Laws, rules, and regulations are not one in the same, and although what MacLean did was prohibited by TSA regulation, it was not “specifically prohibited by law” nor by 5 U. S. C. Section 2302(b)(8)(A), “because regulations do not qualify as ‘law’ under that statute” (Supreme Court of the United States, 2015).

References:

Department of Homeland Security v. MacLean, 714 F. 3d. 1301. Supreme Court of the United States. 2015.