Humanities

Assignment: Situation Leadership Survey

Reflect on the project team you considered in this week’s Discussion. Imagine you have brought the team together to discuss the project’s phases. As the project team manager, you have assessed your team members’ varying skillsets. Some of your team members are very motivated but could use some coaching and light training to be able to accomplish their individual project responsibilities. Other team members have a high level of skills but might need a little motivation to get started because of their workload. Still others have a great deal of experience and skills and are highly motivated. You would not likely need to manage your entire team in the same way.

To prepare for this Assignment, go to the “Situational Leadership Exercise” in your course text, Leadership: Theory and Practice. Complete the exercise and be as honest and objective as you can. Keep your scores on the exercise for analysis in the Final Research Paper

Write a 1- to 2-page paper describing your experience with the “Situational Leadership Exercise.” Analyze how your questionnaire responses indicate your personal leadership philosophy. Describe any questionnaire results that may have surprised you. Analyze the impact that the characteristics of the Situational Approach to Leadership might have on your personal leadership style. Explain how the Situational Approach might help you become a more effective leader.

references

Allio, R. J. (2013). Leaders and leadership—many theories, but what advice is reliable? Strategy & Leadership, 41(1), 4–14.

Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library
databases.

Chamberlin, J. (2013). Situationally
speaking. Management
Services, 57(2), 42–47.

Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library
databases.

Peus, C., Braun, S., & Frey, D. (2013). Situation-based measurement of the full range of leadership model–development and validation of a situational judgment test. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(5), 777–795.

Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library
databases.

Stenmark, C. K., & Mumford, M. D. (2011). Situational impacts on leader ethical decision-making. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 942–55.

Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library
databases.

and also use the attached to help

Writing

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

MAXIMUM WORDS – 350 words total for all the assignment

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

PURPOSE: To analyze the argument of the Organ Donation case .

Use all you know about Critical Thinking to help you write about the Organ Donation case.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

GRADE RUBRIC

ASSESSMENT CRITERIAPOINTS

REMEMBER:Cut and paste this RUBRIC to the cover page of your assignment.

ACTION	DESCRIPTION	MARKS POSSIBLE/YOUR MARKS
Following instructions completely.	Answering all the questions and including all the headings and ideas	5
Writing Quality	Using proper English, full sentences, grammar, correct punctuation, Using headings.	2
Content	Clear understanding of the ideas	3
TOTAL		10

GO TO NEXT PAGE FOR MORE ABOUT ASSIGNMENT 3>>>>>>>>>>>>>

WHAT TO DO:Follow instructions.Make a checklist.

1st.Read the case study.Golden Book, Chapter 8, pages 237,238,239.

2nd.Use everything you have learned in class up to now to answer.

• Remember the purpose of education and critical thinking is to be able to make connections between different ideas, to increase your knowledge and learning.
• Remember about the 3 parts of life
• Remember about the 2 major actions that critical thinking helps you with.
• Remember Fallacies.
• Remember Deductive and Inductive Reasoning.Toulmin Method.
• Remember hypothetical statements and syllogisms.
• Remember Ethics and Morals and special terms.

3rd. Think about and Analyze the 9 MYTHS from the Mayo Clinic. https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/consumer-health/in-depth/organ-donation/art-20047529

4th.Then, CHOOSE 3 (Three) of the MYTHS that you want to write about.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

HOW TO DO THIS ASSIGNMENT:Write INDIVIDUALLY 350 words maximum.MAKE A CHECKLIST FOR THIS.

Make a cover page, Write Name, ID, Section.Paste the RUBRIC to this cover page.

The assignment should use the following 8 HEADINGS to answer the questions. Write the question or the information, then write the answer.

1. INTRODUCTION –(a) VERY BRIEFLY Introduce what the case in the Yellow Book, pages 237-239 is about. (b) Then write what 3 myths have you chosen.(50 words maximum)

2. FACTS — Write all the facts in full sentences, as you understand them about the case in the Yellow Book.pages 237-239

3. VALUES — Write all the values you have when you think about organ donation.Values means what is important to you in life and about life.Include a special term about ETHICS to support your writing (remember from the Black Book, pages 50-51.)

4. MYTH 1 – write the myth from the list in the MAYO CLINCIC article. Then, explain WHY you think it is not factual information. Is it a Fallacy?Explain if yes.Write the term of the fallacy, if it is a fallacy.

5. MYTH 2 – do the same as you did for MYTH 1. Is it a Fallacy?Explain if yes.Write the term of the fallacy.

6. MYTH 3 – do the same as you did for MYTH 1. Is it a Fallacy?Explain if yes.Write the term of the fallacy.

7. NOT INCLUDED — What are the facts, values, or issues that are NOT included in the case and the myths, but YOU think they should be included?

8. CONCLUSION — Has the case study Yellow Book, page 237-39 done a good job or bad job about the topic Organ Donation?What is you reason or reasons, ethics, morals?