Analyze a work of literature, a film, a cultural
icon or phenomenon, that deals explicitly with the topic of black eroticism. Paper must be typed, double-spaced with 12 point font (Times New Roman) and have 1 inch margins. A bibliography or works cited page of at least 5 critical references must be included. Your essay must show a logical argumentative development, critical analysis, scholarly prose, style and organization, and use of formal grammar.
Using the Health Care page of the U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division website, locate three antitrust law cases. Write a 500-750 word analysis of each case that describes the following:
A brief overview of the particulars of the case.
The impact of the case on the law and powerbrokers.
Concerns regarding the case in the role of a health care leader.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Rubic_Print_Format
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
HLT-520 HLT-520-O500 Antitrust Case Analysis 80.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 70.0%
Particulars of the Case 30.0% A description of the particulars of the case is not included. A description of the particulars of the case is incomplete or incorrect. A description of the particulars of the case is included but lacks details. A description of the particulars of the case is complete and includes details. A description of the particulars of the case is extremely thorough with substantial supporting evidence.
Impact of the Case 20.0% A description of the impact of the case on the law and powerbrokers is not included. A description of the impact of the case on the law and powerbrokers is incomplete or incorrect. A description of the impact of the case on the law and powerbrokers is included but lacks details. A description of the impact of the case on the law and powerbrokers is complete and includes details. A description of the impact of the case on the law and powerbrokers is extremely thorough with substantial supporting evidence.
Concerns Regarding the Case 20.0% A description of the concerns regarding the case in the role of a health care leader is not included. A description of the concerns regarding the case in the role of a health care leader is incomplete or incorrect. A description of the concerns regarding the case in the role of a health care leader is included but lacks details. A description of the concerns regarding the case in the role of a health care leader is complete and includes details. A description of the concerns regarding the case in the role of a health care leader is extremely thorough with substantial supporting evidence.
Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format 10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%
100-150 words
Water is essential to life.
Next; choose one (1) of the properties of water below and explain two (2) ways the property can be useful for living systems.
Cohesion
Adhesion
High Specific Heat
Floating Ice
Good Solvent Properties
Dissociation of water molecules
To Prepare:
Part 1: An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry
Create a 4- to 5-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:
Part 2: Identifying Research Methodologies
After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:
Use this document to complete Part 2 of the Module 2 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry and Part 2: Research Methodologies
| Full citation of selected article | Article #1 | Article #2 | Article #3 | Article #4 |
| Why you chose this article and/or how it relates to the clinical issue of interest (include a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest) | ||||
| Brief description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article | ||||
| Brief description of the research methodology used Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative , quantitative , or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific. | ||||
| A brief description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected. | ||||
| General Notes/Comments |
Matrix Worksheet Template
© 2018 Laureate Education Inc. 2