Compare and contrast the fundamental differences in the m…

From the e-Activity, compare and contrast the fundamental differences in the manner in which the general populace may interpret court decisions involving social policy. Provide a rationale for your response. Take a position on whether or not you believe the Supreme Court is responsive to public opinion. Examine the extent to which public opinion should affect Supreme Court decisions. Support your response with at least three (3) examples of the perceived effects of public opinion on Supreme Court decisions.just need one page or half a page.

 

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code “Newclient”

The post Compare and contrast the fundamental differences in the m… appeared first on proessaytutors.

Source link

Compare and contrast the fundamental differences in the m… was first posted on August 22, 2020 at 11:29 am.
©2020 "My Assignment Geek". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at savvyessaywriters@gmail.com

GCU Community Teaching Plan: Community Presentation

Writing

3.3 Provide individualized education to diverse patient populations in a variety of health care settings.

The RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon University meets the requirements for clinical competencies as defined by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), using nontraditional experiences for practicing nurses. These experiences come in the form of direct and indirect care experiences in which licensed nursing students engage in learning within the context of their hospital organization, specific care discipline, and local communities.

Based on the feedback offered by the provider, identify the best approach for teaching. Prepare a presentation based on the Teaching Work Plan and present the information to your community.

Options for Delivery

Select one of the following options for delivery and prepare the applicable presentation:

  1. PowerPoint presentation – no more than 30 minutes
  2. Pamphlet presentation – 1 to 2 pages
  3. Poster presentation

Selection of Community Setting

These are considered appropriate community settings. Choose one of the following:

  1. Public health clinic
  2. Community health center
  3. Long-term care facility
  4. Transitional care facility
  5. Home health center
  6. University/School health center
  7. Church community
  8. Adult/Child care center

Community Teaching Experience Approval Form

Before presenting information to the community, seek approval from an agency administrator or representative using the “Community Teaching Experience Approval Form.” Submit this form as directed in the Community Teaching Experience Approval assignment drop box.

General Requirements

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Comprehensive Global Analysis Outline

Business Finance

Purpose of Assignment

Starting a new, international business venture requires creativity, planning, financing and marketing among the key ingredients for a successful undertaking. Additionally, the different risk analyses that are obligatory of a start-up are equally important for a flourishing company. By putting all of these success factors in motion, the student should have all of the information considered necessary for a winning venture.

Assignment Steps

Resources: Suggested but not required: Abbott, Riley J. (2015). PESTEL Analysis for Students. London, UK: Science and Management Press of London.

Search the Internet for vendors who sell this book or inquire about it with a local library.

Use selected company, country and product in attachment for a global business venture. (SEE ATTACHED FILE)

Conduct a regional, country risk, and organization and product or service analyses of your new global venture.

Prepare a minimum 1,050-word analysis to address the following:

  • Region Analysis – Please note the Region Analysis and Country Analysis are not the same thing. The Regional Analysis refers to the larger geographic region in which your country is located. For example, if your chosen country is Germany, the ‘Region Analysis’ will be conducted for the larger European region as Germany is geographically and economically connected to Europe. Please contact your instructor for further questions.
    • Regional alliances and economic integration
    • Physical environment and its effect on trade
    • Political stability
    • Economic conditions
    • Finance options available
    • Social, health, and environmental conditions
    • Terrorism threats
  • Country Risk Analysis
    • Political and legal stability
    • Economic conditions
    • Finance options available
    • Physical environment and distribution channels
    • Social, health, and environmental conditions
    • Cultural and ethical considerations
  • Organization and Product or Service Analysis
    • Description of your organization
    • Legal structure of organization
    • Market analysis
    • Description of product to meet the need

Format your assignment consistent with APA guidelines.
Include at least 2 peer reviewed Resources and in-text citation.

CSU Global Campus What Makes A Criminal? Essay

Business Finance

What makes a Criminal? (Essay)

Pick two criminals that have committed the same type of crime, one from the United States and one from a different country; give a brief background or insight into the cases, and then apply2-3 criminological theories that can be utilized to explain both of their crimes.

Your paper should be 6-8 pages in length (excluding the cover page and references page) and conform to CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Include at least two scholarly references in addition to the course textbook. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these references.

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
30.0 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 24.0 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 18.0 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 12.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
40.0 to >32.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of Criminological Theories; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

 32.0 to >24.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

 24.0 to >16.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

 16.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent #1
40.0 to >32.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Student picked two criminals/one for the United States, one from another country.

 32.0 to >24.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Student picked two criminals as required, but not all expectations were met.

 24.0 to >16.0 pts

Below Expectation

Student analyzed one criminal within specified component.

 16.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Student did not pick two credible criminals for assignment.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent #2
40.0 to >32.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Student provided a summary of both criminals, one from the United States, one from another country.

 32.0 to >24.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Student provided a summary of both criminals, however, needed to be more in depth.

 24.0 to >16.0 pts

Below Expectation

Student provided a minimal summary of both criminals.

 16.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Student did not provide a summary of both criminals.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
50.0 to >40.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Student strongly applied 2-3 criminological theories to both criminals.

 40.0 to >30.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Student minimally applied 2 criminological theories towards both criminals.

 30.0 to >20.0 pts

Below Expectation

Student applied 1 criminological theory to both criminals.

 20.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Student did not apply criminological theory.

50.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
30.0 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates at least two credible sources in addition to the textbook.

 24.0 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates one credible source in addition to the textbook.

 18.0 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Cites and integrates the textbook only.

 12.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates no credible sources.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Source Material
30.0 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.

 24.0 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

 18.0 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

 12.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.

 16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper essay format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.

 12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper essay format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.

 8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Style
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.

 16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.

 12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

 8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
30.0 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

 24.0 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

 18.0 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

 12.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

30.0 pts

Total Points: 330.0