Please make sure you have the following for each source
a citation
a brief summary
explain why it is a credible source
explain how you will use it to be persuasive in your proposal
SP19 Evaluation of Sources
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome1: APA Citation
2.0 pts
Full Marks
1.0 pts
Partial Marks
0.0 pts
No marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome1: Summary of Source
2.0 pts
Full Marks
1.0 pts
Partial Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome1: Assessment of Source
2.0 pts
Full Marks
1.0 pts
Partial Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome1: ReflectionHow/Why source will be used in proposal
2.0 pts
Full Marks
1.0 pts
Partial Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome1: Grammar and Language
2.0 pts
Full Marks
1.0 pts
Partial Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2: APA Citation
2.0 pts
Full Marks
1.0 pts
Partial Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2: Summary of Source
2.0 pts
Full Marks
1.0 pts
Partial Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2: Assessment of Source
2.0 pts
Full Marks
1.0 pts
Partial Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2: ReflectionHow/Why source is useful for proposal
2.0 pts
Full Marks
1.0 pts
Partial Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2: Grammar and Language
2.0 pts
Full Marks
1.0 pts
Partial Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3: APA Citation
2.0 pts
Full Marks
1.0 pts
Partial Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3: Summary of Source
2.0 pts
Full Marks
1.0 pts
Partial Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3: Assessment of Source
2.0 pts
Full Marks
1.0 pts
Partial Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3: ReflectionHow/Why source is useful for proposal
2.0 pts
Full Marks
1.0 pts
Partial Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3: Grammar and Language
2.0 pts
Full Marks
1.0 pts
Partial Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
Total Points: 30.0
https://www.savvyessaywriters.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/output-onlinepngtools-25-1-300x48.png00adminhttps://www.savvyessaywriters.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/output-onlinepngtools-25-1-300x48.pngadmin2025-02-15 15:08:532023-02-28 19:17:02Evaluation of Sources
This discusses post disaster supply chains. Assume that your pre- and intra-disaster supply chain is established and now the main activities are winding down. Briefly explain the importance of either maintaining “follow on” supplies or preforming rehab to existing cache of material (pick one only). Keep in mind that you need to support both responders and population.
Question: How will staffing, compensation, employee relations, training, and performance management need to be accounted for differently in the HR plan?
Strategic planning is essential for successful health care organizations. Alignment between organizational strategic plans and human resource strategic plans is crucial to effectiveness. When developing organizational plans to address expansion or new services, for example, organizations must be sure to develop human resource plans that support the organizational strategy, as the key to changing organizational direction is through human resource planning. For this Discussion, you examine the following scenario and work with your team to address questions related to human resource strategic planning.
Scenario: The Memorial Hospital is a community-based hospital in an urban area plans to expand its patient care delivery model from focusing extensively on inpatient care to becoming a leader in ambulatory care. The mission of Memorial Healthcare is serving humanity by providing exceptional and cost-effective health care accessible to all. Furthermore, the vision is for Memorial Hospital to be a magnet-status health care provider, continually raising the standards of performance excellence and advancing the health status of the community. In doing so, Memorial Hospital acknowledges its values of compassionate service, ownership/pride, privacy, safety, accountability, teamwork, attitude, appearance, communication, and fun.
Current state:
300-bed hospital
1,000 employees
Limited ambulatory focus, which is primarily supported by free-standing independent physician practices
Declining revenues from inpatient admissions
Considering closing as many as 100 beds, as it transitions from an inpatient focused organization to an outpatient
To prepare for this Discussion:
The Instructor assigned your team a question that relates to human resource strategic planning. Reflect on the scenario and assigned question, and as a team, begin discussing how you would respond to the question. Be sure to approach the question from the perspective of an administrator developing a human resource strategic plan for the hospital in the provided scenario.
EXCELLENT
GOOD
FAIR
POOR
Discussion Posting Content
Points:
Points Range: 9 (37.5%) – 9 (37.5%)
Discussion posting demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 8 (33.33%) – 8 (33.33%)
Discussion posting demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting provides moderate detail (including at least one pertinent example), evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 7 (29.17%) – 7 (29.17%)
Discussion posting demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting may be lacking or incorrect in some area, or in detail and specificity, and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (25%)
Discussion posting demonstrates poor or no understanding of the concepts and key points of the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting is incorrect and/or shallow and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.
Feedback:
Peer Feedback and Interaction
Points:
Points Range: 5 (20.83%) – 5 (20.83%)
The feedback postings and responses to questions are excellent and fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 4 (16.67%) – 4 (16.67%)
The feedback postings and responses to questions are good but may not fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 3 (12.5%) – 3 (12.5%)
The feedback postings, and responses to questions only partially contribute to the quality of interaction by offering insufficient constructive critique or suggestions, shallow questions, or providing poor quality additional resources.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (8.33%)
Student does not interact with peers (0 points) or the feedback postings and responses to questions do not contribute to the quality of interaction by offering any constructive critique, suggestions, questions, or additional resources.
Feedback:
Team Participation
Points:
Points Range: 5 (20.83%) – 5 (20.83%)
Adherence to the Team Charter was well documented. Participation in the team Discussion Thread showed a depth of contribution to the team effort.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 4 (16.67%) – 4 (16.67%)
Adherence to the Team Charter was fully addressed. Participation in the team Discussion thread showed full participation to the team effort.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 3 (12.5%) – 3 (12.5%)
Adherence to the Team Charter was not fully addressed. Participation in the team Discussion Thread showed only minimal contribution to the team effort.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (8.33%)
Adherence to the Team Charter was poorly addressed. Participation in the team Discussion Thread showed poor contribution to the team effort.
Feedback:
Writing
Points:
Points Range: 5 (20.83%) – 5 (20.83%)
Postings are well organized, use scholarly tone, contain original writing and proper paraphrasing, follow APA style, contain very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and are fully consistent with graduate level writing style.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 4 (16.67%) – 4 (16.67%)
Postings are mostly consistent with graduate level writing style. Postings may have some small organization, scholarly tone, writing, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 3 (12.5%) – 3 (12.5%)
Postings are somewhat below graduate level writing style. Postings may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or show moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (8.33%)
Postings are well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or show heavy reliance on quoting.
Identify and examine ways your culture impacts our cognition, language, development, gender, motivations, behaviors, identity, morality, relationships, personality, health, physical development and mental well-being. My culture will be “Armenian” please don’t plagiarise try to put it in your own words so it looks like I wrote it. This is a discussion question it doesn’t need to be long.
The purpose is not to provide a comprehensive description of cultural influences for each of these areas, but rather provide an in-depth look at one facet and/or example of each of these areas. For example, for cognition, you can focus on biological understanding or perceptions of time or understanding of directions. Because you will only be choosing one example/aspect of each area, aim to provide sufficient detail for each area. For example, your description should go beyond the basic description, “Japanese view more objects, both living and non-living, as alive than people from Western cultures do.” and should include a more detailed description of the phenomenon, how the phenomenon compares to other cultures, and a theory about how culture has shaped this phenomenon. This last point is very important: You should aim to describe cultural forces, whether it be economic, religious, linguistic, geographic, or something else, that have influenced the development of this cultural perspective. Please let me know if you are having trouble with any of these points, and I will try my best to guide you in the right direction.
To get the total points, you need to include:
1.) A definition of culture supported by a peer-reviewed source.
2.) Description of how your culture has influenced your development. Be specific about the developmental domain your culture has influenced (see first line of instructions for examples).
3.) Describe cultural forces, whether it be economic, religious, linguistic, geographic, or something else, that have influenced the development of this cultural perspective.
