Self-Motivation & Achievement Of Long-term Goals Psychology Essay Help

Humanities

This is a class question that needs to be answer with at least 150 words. I would like for it to be in your own words. Please No Plagiarism This need a reply to another student in my psychology class

class, Being motivated to complete different task or goals can be very easy at times when that goal is something that you want badly to complete and finish and it can lead to a financial profit or to get award of some kind and if the goal will not take a long time, but, what about those log term goals and tasks that may take a longer time or some to lots of sacrificing to complete, that’s when self motivation and drive will be tested and challenged, i for one sometimes can be mislead myself if i am tire, sleepy form working a job or some other task that took to much time to finish and cause me to have a week motivation to continue that other goals set. Thought?

HU240 Herzing Unit 4 Most Influential Books Assessment Report

Humanities

Unit 4 Assessment – Compare and Contrast Books

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 10:59pm


  • Points
     85
  • Submitting a text entry box or a

    file
     upload

Instructions

Contrast: Books


Evaluation
 Title: Compare and Contrast Books

Look up all of the books from the list below and write a 2 sentence description about each one.

Why do you think each book has been important throughout history?

  • The Meaning of Relativity by by Albert Einstein
  • On the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin
  • Geographia by Ptolemy
  • Silent Spring by Rachel Carson
  • The Complete Works of William Shakespeare By William Shakespeare
  • The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer
  • Uncle Tom’s Cabin by Harriett Beecher Stowe
  • 1984 by George Orwell
  • The Diary of a Young Girl by Anne Frank
  • Critique of Pure Reason by Immanuel Kant
  • Native Son by Richard Wright
  • The Jungle by Upton Sinclair
  • Tibetan Book of the Dead
  • The Bible
  • The Qur’an
  • The Torah

Remember to add your Reference in APA format.

Estimated time to complete: 3 hours

Rubric

HU240 Unit 4 Assessment – Compare and Contrast Books

HU240 Unit 4 Assessment – Compare and Contrast Books
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
27.0 pts

Level 5

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.

 24.0 pts

Level 4

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.

 22.0 pts

Level 3

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.

 19.0 pts

Level 2

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.

 16.0 pts

Level 1

Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions

27.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
27.0 pts

Level 5

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 24.0 pts

Level 4

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 22.0 pts

Level 3

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 19.0 pts

Level 2

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 16.0 pts

Level 1

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

27.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology
15.0 pts

Level 5

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.

 14.0 pts

Level 4

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.

 12.0 pts

Level 3

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.

 11.0 pts

Level 2

Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.

 9.0 pts

Level 1

Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
10.0 pts

Level 5

The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

 6.0 pts

Level 4

The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

 4.0 pts

Level 3

The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication

 2.0 pts

Level 2

The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

 1.0 pts

Level 1

The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
6.0 pts

Level 5

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.

 5.0 pts

Level 4

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.

 4.0 pts

Level 3

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.

 3.0 pts

Level 2

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.

 2.0 pts

Level 1

The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements

 0.0 pts

Level 0

There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

6.0 pts

Total Points: 85.0

Next


The-chief-financial-officer-CFO-of-Sheffield-Corp-accounting-homework-help

The-chief-financial-officer-CFO-of-Sheffield-Corp-accounting-homework-help

The chief financial officer (CFO) of Sheffield Corp. requested that the accounting department prepare a preliminary balance sheet on December 30, 2017, so that the CFO could get an idea of how the company stood. He knows that certain debt agreements with its creditors require the company to maintain a current ratio of at least 2:1. The preliminary balance sheet is as follows.

Sheffield Corp.
Balance Sheet
December 30, 2017
Current assets
Cash $26,200
Accounts receivable 31,700
Prepaid insurance 6,100 $ 64,000
Equipment (net) 201,400
Total assets $265,400
Current liabilities
Accounts payable $ 21,200
Salaries and wages payable 11,700 $ 32,900
Long-term liabilities
Notes payable 81,100
Total liabilities 114,000
Stockholders’ equity
Common stock 100,000
Retained earnings 51,400 151,400
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $265,400

Calculate the current ratio and working capital based on the preliminary balance sheet. (Round Current Ratio to 1 decimal place, e.g. 0.7 : 1.)

Current ratio :1
Working capital $

LINK TO TEXT

Based on the results in (a), the CFO requested that $21,200 of cash be used to pay off the balance of the accounts payable account on December 31, 2017. Calculate the new current ratio and working capital after the company takes these actions. (Round Current Ratio to 1 decimal place, e.g. 0.7 : 1.)

Current ratio :1
Working capital $

The-system-of-criminal-Justice-on-the-fight-against-drugs-law-homework-help

The-system-of-criminal-Justice-on-the-fight-against-drugs-law-homework-help

The system of criminal Justice on the fight against drugs

How does this issue impact police, courts, and corrections. explain

1-2 reference