Some help with this please

Business Finance

Instructions

For Short Paper #1, you will review a hypothetical scenario and compose a 2-page paper in response. You will use this scenario to complete your assignments in Units 3, 4, 6, and 8.

Hypothetical

The following scenario is based upon real events that happened to a family in Cheshire, Connecticut on July 23, 2007. You will use this scenario as the basis of your papers for Units 3, 4, 6, and 8. You can read more about the actual case online by reading the source below.

Swartz-Turfle, H. A Connecticut Nightmare. Retrieved from http://truecrimecases.blogspot.com/2012/08/a-connecticut-nightmare.html.

Dr. William Petit, a well-respected endocrinologist, lived with his wife and two daughters in an upscale community in Cheshire, Connecticut. Dr. Petit met his wife Jennifer, who worked as a nurse, at the Children’s Hospital. They were married for 22 years. Their older daughter, 18-year-old Hayley, loved to play basketball with her father in their driveway and had been accepted to Dartmouth to study medicine in the fall. Their younger daughter, 11-year-old Michaela, who still wore braces, spent time learning to cook with her mother.

Komisarjevsky was a trouble teen, committing his first crime at the age of 12 when he stole a car. His criminal escapades, including countless burglaries, escalated and he even looked for dangerous situations where he might get caught. While other criminals would try to steal during the day when people were at work, Komisarjevsky preferred to do so at night while the occupants were home because he enjoyed the thrill and rush he got. He lived two miles away from the Petit home and came armed with latex gloves, a gun, zip ties, and night vision goggles.

Steven Hayes met Komisarjevsky in a halfway house after they had been released from prison. Hayes was a drug addict and was nervous, loud, and awkward. He had no experience as a burglar but had been arrested 26 times for various offenses and had lived much of his life since 1980 in and out of prison. Most, if not all, of his crimes involved his addiction to drugs and did not involve stealth or reconnaissance. He was supposed to remain in prison until 2008 but, ironically, had been released early for good behavior. Hayes and Komisarjevsky were an odd pair together, but were later described as clicking “like a pair of handcuffs.”

On Saturday, July 22, 2007, Komisarjevsky listened to Guns N’ Roses in the parking lot of a supermarket when he noticed the Petit minivan next to his car with three female occupants. Mrs. Petit and Michaela went into the supermarket while Haley stayed in the car. Komisarjevsky phoned Hayes while waiting in the supermarket parking lot. Hayes was destitute and close to losing his parole. Komisarjevsky’s ankle bracelet had just been removed and his urge for a thrill was overwhelming.

When mother and daughter returned with groceries, Komisarjevsky followed their van several car lengths behind them until he saw where they lived. Komisarjevsky broke into another house just miles away from the Petit home on July 22, 2007 while five people slept upstairs. However, their activities were halted when they heard a car pull into the driveway. But their night was not over. The pair broke into another house and then called it a night, but they started making plans for a more lucrative and serious invasion. Although Hayes was inexperienced as a burglar, he needed money fast. They targeted the Petits for Sunday night.

At 3 a.m. on the morning of the tragedy, after a night of drinking and drug use, Komisarjevsky and Hayes arrived on foot at the Petit house. The pair broke into the house and beat Dr. Petit with a baseball bat before dragging him to the basement, putting a garbage bag over his head, and tying him up to restrain him. The men then went upstairs and tied up Mrs. Petit and her daughters. They then began stealing items from the house, texting each other in the process. They took jewelry, cash, and even a jar of change that Michaela collected for multiple sclerosis research.

Hayes then took four canisters and filled them with gasoline before sunrise. During this time, Komisarjevsky sexually assaulted Michaela and forced her to the bathroom to shower, taking photos as a memento. Haley put up a valiant fight and tried to reach authorities but was beaten when she fought back. When Hayes returned with the gasoline, he forced Mrs. Petit to drive to her bank and withdraw $10,000. Mrs. Petit took out more money than requested to appease Hayes and passed a note to a teller, who called 911. When Mrs. Petit and Hayes returned, Hayes raped and strangled her. The men then poured gasoline on the women and lit a match even though the daughters were still alive. With his house on fire, Dr. Petit emerged from the basement, badly beaten and legs bound, just as authorities were arriving. However, it was too late to save his family. Komisarjevsky and Hayes ran from the burning house. Witnesses could see Hayes wearing one of the girl’s hats and laughing as he ran. They tried to flee in the family’s minivan but were soon caught by the police.

Assignment

Based on the readings and activities in this unit, what degree(s) of homicide should be charged against both of the perpetrators? Be sure to locate the Connecticut Statutes for homicide at https://www.cga.ct.gov/current/pub/chap_952.htm and apply the facts to the language of the statutes to support your answer. Remember to explain why certain homicide statutes, like manslaughter, may not apply to this case. Please also consider whether any inchoate offenses (such as attempted murder) apply for Dr. Petit.

Write a 2-page paper analyzing and discussing the issues presented above. Although there is no required format for this assignment, please write complete sentences in paragraph form. You should cite to your source(s), such as the textbook, case law, statutes, etc.

Role and History of a Family Nurse Practitioner Paper

Science

Role Paper Grading Rubric

Area of Focus Points Possible Points Earned
1. Introduction
– Presented purpose of paper 2
– Identified specific topics to be discussed in an introduction 2
2. Identified a specific APN role after graduation and validated purpose for selecting this role. 10
3. Briefly discussed history of the APN role selected 6
4. Discussed the events that supported the development of this specific APN role. 10
5. Presented your personal philosophy of nursing for the APN role. 15
6. Discussed a personal vision for advanced practice in this specific APN role area AND one needed personal change to implement this vision. 10
7. Discussed one needed change at the national level and one needed change at the state level to achieve your personal vision. 10
8. Discussed three specific individual actions that can advance your personal vision. 15
9. APA format/Maximum length 5 pages (body of paper) excluding title page, abstract and reference page. 10
10. Used correct grammar, sentence structure, spelling, punctuation, etc. Correctly cites all references and used no more than one short quote. 10

Total Points Earned = _________

*Please follow the rubric closely.

*The answer to question number 2 is Family Nurse Practitioner

you can use any sources that you need to help answer the question, for personal changes you can use your own. abstract and reference page can be 5 total pages.


Complete Geography Assignment Currency and International Commerce environmental science homework help

Complete Geography Assignment Currency and International Commerce environmental science homework help

Currency and International Commerce

Write a 2 page, double-spaced paper.

Address the following in your paper:

The US dollar has been used for decades as a medium of exchange, worldwide. Before the US dollar was so highly regarded, international commerce used the British pound sterling.

  • What causes world powers to choose to trade in one specific currency?
  • What does that mean for the world economy?
  • Why do the standard currencies change?
  • Do you see any changes in currency coming?

Note: Be sure to tie all that you write into both political and economic contexts.

There is no requirement for a title page, references or APA style.

Building-on-the-information-that-you-prepared-from-your-Midterm-Assignment

Building-on-the-information-that-you-prepared-from-your-Midterm-Assignment

I will added everything you need all the readings, also week six is not up yet but I will added it next week I wanted to give you a head start. I will add my midterm paper and how to make it better because he took off a lot I did get a B, but I need better. On my midterm paper I did add a few things he had to say. really need this paper to be good. Once again I will add week 6 things this coming week thank you

Assignment Instructions

Building on the information that you prepared from your Midterm Assignment, prepare a new research paper that addresses the below information in 5-7 full pages of content (not counting title or reference pages):

For the terrorist organization likely to conduct an attack within the United States that you selected, determine:

– What domestic data collection programs would be best utilized on the organization you selected? (Intelligence Collection disciplines discussed in week 5) Do not focus on overseas intelligence collection programs; this is an HLSS course and we are focused only on the homeland.

– Which members of the IC would be the best collectors of intelligence on this particular organization? (we discussed the agencies of the intelligence community in week 2) You may address agencies that collect overseas and within the homeland as the terrorism nexus overlaps both domains. You may also consider some of the field agencies of DHS (since DHS I&A is just an office and does not collect) as some of the operating components do collect like ICE, CBP, USCG, and the Secret Service (who does focus on terrorism financing). Again, this is a Homeland Security course, so focus on the agencies that can support the homeland (like the FBI), not primarily overseas intelligence collection of foreign targets.

– What intelligence analysis strategies would be the most effective and why? (choose only from the strategies discussed in the week 6 lesson). Remember that critical thinking is not a strategy — be specific about what you think will help analyze what we collect on a clandestine terrorist group attempting to attack the U.S. homeland.

Note: As a paper for this HLSS course, these questions are to be answered as it relates to collecting and analyzing intelligence on the terrorist group plans and activities within the U.S. as they prepare to attack so that law enforcement and security officials here in the homeland can detect, identify, and warn on this potential or hypothetical attack. You do not need to address how to stop this attack, that will be the subject of your recommendations in your final paper. Only address your hypothetical attack using a paragraph or two (unless you were specifically told that you did not address the attack in sufficient detail in your midterm).

This progress paper will set the stage for your final paper where you will then discuss how intelligence, law enforcement and homeland security officials from all three levels of government can prevent or disrupt this attack (as well as your recommendations to them in your final paper). Therefore, do not address measures to stop or interdict the terrorists in your progress paper, only focus here in this paper on intelligence collection disciplines, the most appropriate IC agencies to play a role, and the most effective analytical techniques to employ in this scenario.

I would also remind you that the CIA does not collect anything domestically, they are a foreign intelligence agency. See the readings from week 5 as well as this link to Executive Order 12333 https://www.cia.gov/about-cia/eo12333.html. The NSA is very different as they can and do collect both foreign and domestic communications when authorized by a court (like FISA) or under certain conditions by the Attorney General (to support the FBI). See https://www.nsa.gov/about/faqs/sigint-faqs.shtml

The Progress Assignment is due on Sunday of Week 6. The analysis must be double spaced and follow APA guidelines (in -text parenthetical citation format, not endnotes or footnotes) and be free of typographical, spelling and grammatical errors (see example paper). 5 is the minimum number of pages of content not counting title page and reference page. Name the assignment “LastnameHLSS320Progresspaper.doc”. Compliance with the above directions, quality of your analysis, and the SSGS Assignment Rubric for 300-400 Level Classes will be used to evaluate this assignment. Assignment Rubric

Clarification on assignments: The first paper (the midterm, your Red Cell paper) was about the terrorist group you selected and was basically from the terrorist perspective, and it should have addressed attack scenarios of how your group could attack the U.S. Homeland. The second paper (the progress assignment) is from the friendly perspective and is on how the U.S. can do intelligence collection and analysis on the terrorist group:

For the final assignment, it will give you an opportunity to describe how to stop the attack by making your own recommendations based on what you learned.

Note: You must use APA (in-text parenthetical) format [but not endnotes or footnotes] in HLSS owned courses. The APUS library has many useful documents, videos and guides on how to research, write and cite for college level papers. See http://www.apus.edu/Online-Library/resources-services/resources/student-academic-resource-center.html. I have also attached an example papers to the assignment instructions for your midterm that you should use as a template for your papers in this course.

Make sure you read the instructions carefully and that you focus your paper on answering the assigned question. This assignment is a research paper, not an opinion paper, so you need to cite scholarly sources to support your thesis. Make sure you use APA style in-text parenthetical citations at the end of every sentence where you are quoting or paraphrasing another’s ideas (or any information) that is not your own thoughts and words, like this (Bergen, 2015, para 14). I highly recommend you use the APUS writing guide based on the APA style which can be found in the university library or at this link: APUS Style Guide for APA. You are welcome to use supplementary sources to compliment the assigned readings based upon your research, but make sure you use scholarly and credible sources. See the APUS Library Homeland Security Program Guide for good sources, as well as the APUS Research Primer and the APUS Library Research FAQs.

Requirements:

– 5-7 Full pages of text (not counting title page or references). 5 FULL pages of content is the minimum acceptable length

– Written according to the APA style and format;

– Use Times New Roman 12 point font;

– 1 inch margins on all sides with no paragraph indentation other than the first line by .5 inches

– Double space all text (no extra lines or spaces after a paragraph or section headings and no added font sizes or lines either)

A respectable number of credible resources used, cited in the paper as in-text citations, and included on the reference page. A good rule of thumb is at least 2 scholarly sources per page of content (at least 10 scholarly references for this 5 page paper). Use those sources provided to you throughout the course (listed in the announcements), as well as other material obtained from conducting your own research. Freely utilize appropriate and reputable academic sources, summarize in your own words and cite accordingly.

Be mindful of excessive direct quotes as the paper should not contain just a string of various quotations. Make sure you comply with all academic integrity standards expected by APUS and as slide 14 of the APUS Academic Integrity presentation posted in course syllabus (and the week 1 introduction forum) states “Quotes cannot make up more than 10% of the text of your assignment.” So paraphrase where you can and provide your own analysis and synthesis of your research. See the syllabus tab within this course for more important information on academic integrity and the repercussions of plagiarism.