Week 2 – Discussion 2
Genetic Engineering
Genetic engineering methods such as gene knockout (developing organisms that lack a particular gene) and gene replacement (developing organisms in which a particular gene has been replaced with another) are used widely in biopsychology research. Discuss how these methods affect brain structure and functioning. What are the ethical concerns of this type of research? Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts no later than Monday, Day 7.
Week 2 – Discussion 1
Invasive Methods
Invasive methods such as lesioning and stimulation are used within biopsychology to answer certain questions about function within the brain. After reading about these methods in your text and conducting additional research on the effectiveness of the methods, discuss the pros and cons of these methods in terms of their effectiveness and potential side effects. What are some of the disadvantages to using these invasive methods? Include citations to support your claims. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts no later than Monday, Day 7.
Grading rubric
points (2)
Discussion Rubric – 2 points (2)
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGeneral Content/Subject Knowledge
0.6 pts
Distinguished – Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates in-depth knowledge of the discussion topic.
0.53 pts
Proficient – Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates knowledge of the discussion topic.
0.46 pts
Basic – Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates basic knowledge of the discussion topic.
0.38 pts
Below Expectations – Addresses all or most aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates limited knowledge of the discussion topic.
0.0 pts
Non-Performance – There is no initial discussion post, or the post does not address the discussion prompt at all.
0.6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking
0.6 pts
Distinguished – Comprehensively explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates all of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.
0.53 pts
Proficient – Explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates most of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.
0.46 pts
Basic – Explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates some of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, and use of information, and logic.
0.38 pts
Below Expectations – Attempts to explore the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provide relevant evidence and information, but demonstrates few of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.
0.0 pts
Non-Performance – There is no attempt to explore the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provide relevant evidence and information in either the original post or subsequent response posts within the discussion, or no post is present.
0.6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngagement/ Participation
0.6 pts
Distinguished – Contributes to classroom conversations with at least the minimum number of replies, all of which were thoughtful, relevant, and contributed meaningfully to the conversation. Fully engages in the conversation with appropriate topic-based responses.
0.53 pts
Proficient – Contributes to classroom conversations with the minimum number of replies that are somewhat thoughtful, relevant, and contributed meaningfully to the conversation. Attempts to fully engage in the conversation with appropriate topic-based responses.
0.46 pts
Basic – Contributes to the classroom conversations with the minimum number of replies. Attempts to fully engage in the conversation, but the responses are not relevant or fully aligned with the discussion topic.
0.38 pts
Below Expectations – Attempts to contribute to the classroom conversations with fewer than the minimum number of replies; however, the replies are not thoughtful and relevant, or they do not contribute meaningfully to the conversation.
0.0 pts
Non-Performance – There is no contribution to the discussion.
0.6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Communication
0.2 pts
Distinguished – Displays clear control of syntax and mechanics. The organization of the work shows appropriate transitions and flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
0.18 pts
Proficient – Displays control of syntax and mechanics. The organization of the work shows transitions and/or flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains only a few errors and is mostly easy to understand.
0.15 pts
Basic – Displays basic control of syntax and mechanics. The work is not organized with appropriate transitions and flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains several errors, making it difficult to fully understand.
0.13 pts
Below Expectations – Displays limited control of syntax or mechanics. The work does not include any transitions and does not flow easily between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains major errors.
0.0 pts
Non-Performance – Fails to display control of syntax or mechanics, within the original post and/or responses. Organization is also not present.
0.2 pts
Total Points: 2.0
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code “Newclient”
