Discussion: Validity in Quantitative Research

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT;Discussion: Validity in Quantitative Research

Week 6 discussion Validity in Quantitative Research Designs Validity in research refers to the extent researchers can be confident that the cause and effect they identify in their research are in fact causal relationships. If there is low validity in a study, it usually means that the research design is flawed and the results will be of little or no value. Four different aspects of validity should be considered when reviewing a research design: statistical conclusion validity, internal validity, construct validity, and external validity. In this Discussion, you consider the importance of each of these aspects in judging the validity of quantitative research. To prepare: Review the information in Chapter 10 of the course text on rigor and validity. Read the method section of one of the following quasi-experimental studies (also located in this week’s Learning Resources). Identify at least one potential concern that could be raised about the study’s internal validity. Metheny, N. A., Davis-Jackson, J., & Stewart, B. J. (2010). Effectiveness of an aspiration risk-reduction protocol. Nursing Research, 59(1), 18–25. Padula, C. A., Hughes, C., & Baumhover, L. (2009). Impact of a nurse-driven mobility protocol on functional decline in hospitalized older adults. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 24(4), 325–331. Yuan, S., Chou, M., Hwu, L., Chang, Y., Hsu, W., & Kuo, H. (2009). An intervention program to promote health-related physical fitness in nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(10), 1,404–1,411. Consider strategies that could be used to strengthen the study’s internal validity and how this would impact the three other types of validity. Think about the consequences of an advanced practice nurse neglecting to consider the validity of a research study when reviewing the research for potential use in developing an evidence-based practice. By Day 3 Post the title of the study that you selected and your analysis of the potential concerns that could be raised about the study’s internal validity. Propose recommendations to strengthen the internal validity and assess the effect your changes could have with regard to the other three types of validity. Discuss the dangers of failing to consider the validity of a research study. Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses. By Day 6 Respond to at least two of your colleagues in one or more of the following ways: Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, and evidence. Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives. Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own review of the literature in the Walden Library. Validate an idea with your own experience and additional sources. Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings. Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 50
Use the following coupon code :
NPS10

Order Now

The post Discussion: Validity in Quantitative Research appeared first on NursingPaperSlayers.

respond

BEFORE you respond to the essay questions, please carefully read instructions below:

ALL your responses on this page to short essay questions MUST INCLUDE the following elements to address the question asked: (1) Include at least three different quotes from 3 different readings/videos to support your views/arguments; (2) analysis of at least four different examples/illustrations/story details/historical facts from the films/videos/readings that are the focus of a given question.

PLEASE ANSWER ONLY THREE OUT OF THE FOLLOWING LIST OF QUESTIONS (18points):

1. Based on our viewing and discussion of Rgis Wargnier’s film Indochine (1992), offer a careful and well-documented analysis of the film, using at least four specific examples from the film, to illustrate the films representation of French Indochina and that part of French history: Through whose perspective are the historical facts mediated/ filtered in the films? Whose perspective is dominant or foregrounded most? The French or the indigenous populations? What does it tell us about how the French would like to remember this part of their History as a nation? Your answer needs to consider and use quotes from at least three different readings/videos we discussed in Module 4 to support your main points and arguments.

2. Using at least four specific examples/plot details directly drawn from the film, discuss the portrayal of the main character Eliane in the film Indochine by considering what values she stands for, her relationship with other characters, her image as a symbol of France, and how her perspective shapes our understanding of the history of French Indochina. Your answer needs to consider and use quotes from at least three different readings/videos we discussed in Module 4 to support your main points and arguments.

3. Using at least four specific examples/plot details directly drawn from the documentary, discuss the ways in which the personal story of Liachoua Lee in the documentary Hmong Memory at the Crossroads intersects with collective History. What is the value we gain from bringing the personal story and collective History into conversation/into contact with each other? Using very specific examples directly from the film, discuss the ways in which his story allows us to recognize the intersections of American, French and Hmong histories, and the significance of this fact. Your answer needs to consider and use quotes from at least three different readings/videos we discussed in Modules 1, 2, and 4 to support your main points and arguments.

4. Using at least four specific examples/plot details directly drawn from the documentary, how does the documentary directed by French journalist Cyril Payen Secret War in Laos (studied among videos assigned in Module 4) show the unknown history of the Hmong people, and how does it highlight facts about the PRESENT condition of the Hmong people, as well as facts about their PAST that are not present in the film

Indochina ? How does the documentary represent the consequences of their participation in French Indochina War on their lives after the war? How does this documentary re-write the history of French Indochina from the perspective of this Hmong Asian minority? Your answer needs to consider and use quotes from at least three different readings/videos we discussed in Modules 1, 2 and 4 to support your main points and arguments.

5. Using at least four specific examples/plot details directly drawn from the documentary Growing up Hmong at the Crossroads, discuss how does Cedric Lee, the voiceover and key young Hmong participant in the film, describe his own journey and identity? how does he view his relationship to Detroit and to American society? How does he view his relationship to France and Laos? how do they fit in his individual identity? How does his father Liachoua’s work of remembering his family’s past connected with their desire to fit and create a place for themselves in French society and American society? What moments in the film do you consider thematically significant and why? give very specific examples from the film to support your answer. Your answer needs to consider and use quotes from at least three different readings/videos we discussed in Modules 1, 2 and 4 to support your main points and arguments.

The post respond appeared first on Savvy Essay Writers.

Describe the hacker subculture and the normative orders. You must provide a discussion of specific, illustrative examples. Your response should be a minimum of 500 words. Must incite and reference per APA standard

Describe the hacker subculture and the normative orders. You must provide a discussion of specific, illustrative examples. Your response should be a minimum of 500 words. Must incite and reference per APA standard

WE ALL KNOW CLASSWORK IS BORING. THUS, OUR ESSAY HELP SERVICE EXISTS TO HELP STUDENTS WHO ARE OVERWHELMED WITH STUDIES. ORDER NOW FOR 20% DISCOUNT. USE CODE SAVE20

Source link

Describe the hacker subculture and the normative orders. You must provide a discussion of specific, illustrative examples. Your response should be a minimum of 500 words. Must incite and reference per APA standard was first posted on April 3, 2020 at 3:07 am.
©2020 "My Assignment Geek". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at savvyessaywriters@gmail.com

https://www.savvyessaywriters.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/output-onlinepngtools-25-1-300x48.png 0 0 admin https://www.savvyessaywriters.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/output-onlinepngtools-25-1-300x48.png admin2025-02-15 15:08:532023-02-28 19:17:02Describe the hacker subculture and the normative orders. You must provide a discussion of specific, illustrative examples. Your response should be a minimum of 500 words. Must incite and reference per APA standard

Goverment homework discussion post (reply)

YOU ARE TO REPLY TO THIS STUDENTS POST NO LESS THAN 250 WORDS NO MORE THAN 300 WORDS. NO PLAGIARISM. I AHVE ATTACHED THE ORIGINL Ken Ewert’s article Moral Criticisms of the Market (1989) explores the subject of religion and economics, and rebuts the leftist views of the “Christian Socialists” in regards to …

Goverment homework discussion post (reply) Read More »

https://www.savvyessaywriters.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/output-onlinepngtools-25-1-300x48.png 0 0 admin https://www.savvyessaywriters.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/output-onlinepngtools-25-1-300x48.png admin2025-02-15 15:08:532023-02-28 19:17:02Goverment homework discussion post (reply)