This is a discussion response to the attached document.
-Offer at least 1 strength and 1 weakness to the following post.
-Accurately applied 2 or more scholarly (peer-reviewed) sources to each question.
-Apply 1 Biblical Scripture
– Write in FIRST PERSON. As an example. ( I agree with you on the…, I think you made a valid point when…, I differ with you on…) DO NOT USE PHRASE SUCH AS. ” This writer had a valid point on…”
Dave, a licensed real estate agent, and Jim a real estate developer, worked together on past real estate deals and knew each other from their numerous prior successful business relationships. Jim, for many years had attempted to purchase a parcel of land owned by Clark County, NV located at Tropicana and the Beltway in Las Vegas (the Parcel), but Jim had been unsuccessful in his efforts.
Dave had a great relationship with the Manager of Clark County knew and knew that the County might now be interested in selling the Parcel provided a buyer could close quickly. Based on this information Dave contacted Jim, knowing of Jims long-standing interest.
Based upon Daves suggestion and proprietary information that Dave had by virtue of his personal relationship with the Manager of Clark County, Jim offered $3,000,000 to buy the Parcel. With this offer, Jim told Dave he would pay him a 3% real estate commission. Dave believed that this was a sure thing that would pay him $90,000 when Jim purchased the property.
Clark County rejected Jims offer and the deal suggested by Dave fell apart.
Shortly thereafter Jim formed a new LLC that he named SDU Partners, LLC (SDU stands for Shady, Deceitful and Underhanded Partners in Jims mind. This acronym and its meaning is unknown to Dave and Dave is unaware of this entity).
SDU, LLC then approached Clark County directly and offered $3,500,000; an offer that the County accepted. The transaction closed two weeks later, and Dave was not paid a real estate commission.
After the closing, Dave discovered that Jim had defrauded him by creating SDU, LLC to approach the County directly.
Was a valid agency relationship created between Dave and Jim that would entitle Dave to receive his real estate commission, and what other damages might exist from this transaction?
What should Dave have done differently to make sure that his commission would be paid?
Historical criticism of the last supper painting
analysis of a work of art adopting a critical lens ( historical criticism). Have 4 peer review sources and 3 more if needed secondary sources. Assignment. Select one artifact ( last supper), use a critical lens( historical criticism). Things to consider: the point of the paper is abstraction, simply reporting on your sources and describing your artifact will not be enough . This is a research paper, so keep the focus on research, not opinion
The post Historical criticism of the last supper painting appeared first on Student Homeworks.
The post were-there-nuclear-weapons-used-korean-war appeared first on ukbestwriting.com.
