SEE IN DESCRIPTION

I am willing to pay a one time fee of 3.00 for whoever can answer this today.

 

 

The components of ordinary gunpowder are elemental sulfur, charcoal, and potassium nitrate. When gunpowder explodes, these components react as follows:                   3S8 (s) + 16C(s) + 32KNO3 (s)                   Sulfur     Carbon    Potassium nitrate      16K2 O(s)    +    16CO2 (g)    +   16N2 (g)   +   24SO2 (g)

Potassium oxide   Carbon dioxide   Nitrogen     Sulfur dioxide

For this redox reaction, the reducing agents are __________ and __________.

WE ALL KNOW CLASSWORK IS BORING. THUS, OUR ESSAY HELP SERVICE EXISTS TO HELP STUDENTS WHO ARE OVERWHELMED WITH STUDIES. ORDER YOUR CUSTOM PAPER FOR 20% DISCOUNT. USE CODE SAVE20

Source link

SEE IN DESCRIPTION was first posted on August 8, 2020 at 1:40 pm.
©2020 "My Assignment Geek". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at savvyessaywriters@gmail.com

How would you characterize effective altruism?

D. Matthews’s Response to N. Bostrom on Existential Risk (Readings and lectures Week 11)

Format: submit a doc, docx, rtf, txt, or pdf file to Turnitin via iLearn

Length: 1600-1800 words (include word count at the start of the paper)

Due date: If submitted by 05/04: +1.5 Extra credit on course grade If submitted after 05/12: penalty: -0.5/day on essay grade

Overview:

Nick Bostrom argues that avoiding existential risk and existential loss should be a global priority. Dylan Matthews responds by stating that Bostrom’s argument relies on a false sense of statistical precision, and by questioning his assumption that people who might exist in the future should be counted equally to people who do exist today. This assignment asks you to present and assess Matthews’s critique, that is, identify the claim and its justifications.

Assignment:

Compose an essay discussing the following questions:

• How would you characterize effective altruism? Are there good reasons to support this view?

• According to “existential risk obsessives,” why should effective altruists care about existential risk?

• What does Matthews mean when he says, “global poverty is a rounding error”? Is this an accurate characterization of Bostrom’s viewpoint?

• Are Matthews’s criticisms of Bostrom’s argument valid and reasonable? Why or why not?

Writing and Structural Notes:

• It is crucial that you present Bostrom’s argument and Matthews’s criticism.

• The presentation of somebody else’s argument should be done in your own words (i.e., not just a quotation), and should be done as clearly and plainly as possible.

• Present also your own take on Bostrom’s argument. That is, explain whether or not you agree with it and why: You may agree with a claim but not the justifications given for it. Conversely, you may agree with all the reasons given to support a claim, but not agree that they do in fact support the claim in question.

• Be sure to include a proper introduction and conclusion. An introduction should do the following:

o Introduce the reader to the problem. That is, explain in general terms what the topic is, what the issue is, and why the reader should care about it.

o Introduce the reader to what will be done in the essay: explain briefly what the different parts of the essay will be, that is, provide a roadmap

You do not need to use additional sources.

• Cite all sources using both in-text citations and a works cited page.

Rubric:

• Most important for this assignment is the accurate, fair exposition of Bostrom’s and Matthews’s claims. • Also, important—but to a lesser degree—is your assessment of these claims (particularly of Matthews’s criticism). • Clarity of expression is paramount. Aim to write simple, plain sentences. Avoid technical terms and jargon whenever possible.

attachment
Bostrom_Existential_Risk.pdf
attachment
IspentaweekendatGoogletalkingwithnerdsaboutcharity.Icameawayworried.-Vox.pdf

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient”for a 15% Discount!”


Buy Custom Nursing Papers

The post How would you characterize effective altruism? appeared first on Student Homeworks.

Helppppp

CCSS & Differentiated Classrooms

What we have learned so far in this course is that students come to us from diverse backgrounds and have their own unique learning needs. We have also learned that the systems of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) are grounded in differentiated instructional practices to form the basis of quality curriculum.

As noted in Week Two, you participate in your school’s Professional Learning Community (PLC) as developing experts in implementing differentiated instruction. For this assignment, you will create the content for a blog (not actually creating the blog at this time) that identifies differentiated assessment and teaching strategies. These strategies can be used to assess student mastery of the new Common Core State Standards while providing engaging and rigorous classroom instruction.

For the purpose of this assignment, you will be using a Word document (two to three pages) to create a prospective blog that can be designed online at another time.

Within your blog, you must:

  • Describe (in general) the standards for mathematics.
  • Describe (in general) the standards for English language arts.
  • Summarize the Common Core State Standards initiative including their purpose (i.e., the expectations of the CCSS) and academic impact.
  • Discuss how differentiated instruction is an essential strategy for the CCSS.
  • Explain five or more differentiated strategies, tools, or activities that will support teachers’ implementation of the CCSS for mathematics.
  • Explain five or more differentiated strategies, tools, or activities that will support teachers’ implementation of the CCSS for English language arts.

 

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get a Discount! Use Coupon Code “Newclient”

The post Helppppp appeared first on Proficient Writers Hub.

audio amplifier circuit revision 1

1-Please remove the parts in the introduction about classes (class a, class b, etc)

2-the Technical description does not include any of my circuits, but instead is something unrelated.

3-power supply and selection section

– has unrelated pictures

– has unrelated and wrong description

– please review instructions

4-analog controls circuit section

– there should be no inductors involved

– you can simply describe the circuit as as attached.

– the purpose of the analog circuit is {treble and bass and volume} only, just explain that.

5-amplitude amplifier circuit section

– does not need to include any “sum” stuff ar anything that followed it.

– please expand after removing the existing stuff.

6-current amplifier circuit section

– does not have anything to do with “bass”

– does not have anything to do with photodiodes

– simply describe the circuit as attached or ask me questions about the report if unsure.

7-design approach and methodology is entirely wrong, please stick by my documents and instructions or contact me if unclear.

8-please rewrite the conclusion and future work together after you have done the report.

I welcome any questions, any time you need. Thanks again.

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient”for a 15% Discount!”


Buy Custom Nursing Papers

The post audio amplifier circuit revision 1 appeared first on Student Homeworks.