NONPROFIT Article Post.

Choose an essay cited by Bekkers and Wiepking in their review and explain in greater depth how this article helps to explain a particular motivation to give.
The purpose of this assignment is to see the range of incentives for giving
and how those incentives manifest. 

Find the essay using the library resources and analyze it.  In your post (350-600 words) you should do the following.

List the full citation.
Describe the goal of the research design. What did the author set out to test?
Describe the methods. Was it a survey, descriptive work, lab or field study?
Describe the results. What was significant?  Were there secondary results?  Were these also discussed in the literature review by Bekkers and Wiepking?
Did Bekkers and Wiepking leave out any important points from the text?

(I study nonprofit management as an international student from China.
I choose the
Immigration and citizenship status topic in Bekkers, R. and Wiepking, P. (2007)(1). Generosity and Philanthropy, A Literature Review,.pdf ,

make sure you take a look at the PDF doc first and search the text below:
Immigration and citizenship status
Osili and Du (2005) found that immigrants in the United States are less likely to give
to charitable organizations and also give less, but that these differences are due to differences
in racial background, lower levels of income, and education. Wong, Lien and Conway (2005)
find that immigrants (especially foreign-born non US citizens) are less likely to donate money
to political parties than US born citizens. Frey and Meier (2004a; 2005) find that immigrant
students are less likely to donate to social funds of their university than native students.
Individuals born in a non-English speaking country give less often and lower amounts in
Australia (Lyons & Nivison-Smith 2006). Mean amounts donated by foreign born and
Canadian born citizens do not seem to differ (Mata & McRae 2000) though contributions
increase with the number of years residing in the country. Osili and Du (2005) find that the
gap between immigrants and native citizens closes as time spent in the US increases. They
also find that immigrants spend more on informal donations to family members often in
their country of origin (remittances) than native Americans. While informal donations
among native Americans also exceed formal donations (Schervish & Havens 2002), this gap
appears to be wider among immigrants. Brown and Ferris (2007) find that US citizens give
more to religion than immigrants, controlling for memberships and trust.

the article I choose is Osili and Du (2005) which I have upload -Immigrant assimilation and charitable giving

use this article to do the Article Post.
Choose an essay cited by Bekkers and Wiepking in their review and explain in greater depth how this article helps to explain a particular motivation to give.
The purpose of this assignment is to see the range of incentives for giving
and how those incentives manifest.  Students will be asked to post this assignment to the Canvas course site. [L1, L3]

Find the essay using the library resources and analyze it.  In your post (350-600 words) you should do the following.

List the full citation.
Describe the goal of the research design. What did the author set out to test?
Describe the methods. Was it a survey, descriptive work, lab or field study?
Describe the results. What was significant?  Were there secondary results?  Were these also discussed in the literature review by Bekkers and Wiepking?
Did Bekkers and Wiepking leave out any important points from the text?

The post NONPROFIT Article Post. appeared first on Savvy Essay Writers.

social problem Signature Assignment

This week your task is to prepare an annotated outline for your Signature Assignment. Use the following criteria to organize your outline, which will become the basis of your Signature Assignment. The Signature Assignment for this course is to identify a current social problem with which a social worker may be involved. As part of …

social problem Signature Assignment Read More »

Generating a Policy Proposal

Assignment 1: LASA 2: Generating a Policy Proposal

Although some states and cities have passed laws to ban texting and using handheld phones while driving, there is no current law to ban all cell phone use while driving. However, according to the National Safety Council (2009), 28 percent of all crashes—1.6 million per year—are caused by cell phone use and texting by drivers. The mission of a new national nonprofit organization called FocusDriven, patterned after Mothers Against Drunk Driving, is to make phone use while driving as illegal and socially unacceptable as drunk driving. US Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood supports FocusDriven and its efforts: According to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, LaHood said this movement will become “an army of people traveling the countryside” to push for bans on cell phone use and tough enforcement (Schmit, 2010).

As a political advocate interested in this issue, you will be writing a policy proposal that utilizes the current research to propose a solution to the issue and submit it in this assignment.

Please note that your proposal is not an opinion/position paper, and your conclusions need to be based on the scientific research you reviewed earlier. Please follow the typical steps in proper academic writing (planning, outlining, drafting, revising, proofing, and editing) to generate the following proposal structure:

Introduction

In the introduction, you should set up the purpose for the proposal, provide a bit of background on the topic, and present your thesis.

Policy

Now that you have researched a variety of studies (in M4: Assignment 2), compile that information together to create a recommendation for policy makers regarding cell phone use while driving.

1: In a one-page summary, compare and contrast the results of the various studies regarding the cognitive abilities that are affected during cell phone use while driving.

2: Using that research, develop and explain particular recommendations for policy makers. For instance, restrict texting, or regulate the use of hand-held phones. All your recommendations must be supported by your research findings.

3: Based on the gaps in current research, describe the variables, populations, and situations which you would like to see future research address.

Conclusion

Review the important current research, your conclusions from that research, and how the future could look in both policy and research. Keep your goal in mind: To convince the reader to support your current policy proposal and future research to examine this issue more closely.

Your proposal should be written in APA style (which includes a title page with running header and a reference page), and free of typographical and grammatical errors. The body of your proposal should be 4–5 pages long.

By Saturday, August 30, 2014, deliver your assignment to the M5: Assignment 1 Dropbox.

Course Project Grading Criteria and Rubric

Assignment 1 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Analysis and comparison of current research on cognitive effects of phone use, intoxication, age, and other factors while driving. (Course Objectives [CO]1 CO2)
72
Recommendations for public policy.
(CO3)
72
Recommendations for future research.
(CO2, CO3)
92
Writing Components:
Organization (16)
Usage and Mechanics (16)
APA Elements (24)
Style (8)
64
Total:
300
Click here to view the rubric for this assignment.

Schmitz, J. (2010, January 13). Cell phone ban for drivers is focus of new group.
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved from http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10013/1027757-147.stm.

National Research Council. (2010). National Safety Council Estimates that At Least 1.6 Million Crashes Each Year Involve Drivers Using Cell Phones and Texting. Available at
http://www.nsc.org/pages
/nscestimates16millioncrashescausedbydriversusingcellphonesandtexting.aspx

 

 

 

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get a Discount! Use Coupon Code “Newclient”

The post Generating a Policy Proposal appeared first on Savvy Essay Writers.

Pollution

12pt Times New Roman or Arial font, headers
Title
A clear thesis that takes a clear stance on the topic
An introduction
Support paragraphs (minimum of 3) that include quotes and/or paraphrases (correctly parenthetically cited)
A conclusion
A proper MLA formatted works cited page.