two companies that have been victims of cloud related security breach two companies i choose are microsoft amp dropbox

2 to 3 double spaced pages or 550 words(-not including title page, Abstract, Introduction and reference page).

INCLUDE:

Company name – type of company-brief history-Customers(consumer,businesses)

Type of threat

what or who caused the threat

How the threat was discovered

how the threat was resolved

How do you believe the issue might have been avoided? Use third person: One may argue; it may be concluded

Know the repercussions from the threat

Use APA 6 formatting and citations. Make sure proper citations are made

NO PLAGARISM!!

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient”for a 15% Discount!”

We have Walden University and Capella University nursing practitioners!


Buy Custom Nursing Papers

To the best of your ability, state the hypothesis of the study.

By reading such articles, you will gain an understanding of how research design and statistical analysis are related to psychological phenomenon. Please include the following to receive full credit. This is what my Professor want from my paper.

MUST BE AT LEAST ONE PAGE LONG DOUBLE SPACED.

1. To the best of your ability, state the hypothesis of the study.

2. Describe the task/experiment mentioned in the study.

3. Were the results reported to be statistically significant? Justify why.

4. Describe general conclusions made by the authors

5. Describe the strengths of the study.

6. Describe the weaknesses of the study.

7. What are some ways you could improve upon the study?

attachment
GREITEMEYER2016SubjectiveSESCausesAggression.pdf

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient”for a 15% Discount!”


Buy Custom Nursing Papers

The post To the best of your ability, state the hypothesis of the study. appeared first on Student Homeworks.

analyze root cause of patient event

A root cause analysis (RCA) is a structured approach of problem solving methods used to reveal the causes of problems or events (American Society for Quality, n.d.). RCA is widely used as an error analysis technique in healthcare to identify underlying systemic problems that increase the likelihood of errors while, at the same time, avoiding the placing of blame on individuals. Here, healthcare patient safety experts use the systems thinking approach to identify both active errors (errors occurring at the point of interface between humans and a complex system), as well as latent errors (the hidden problems within health care systems that contribute to adverse events). The goal of RCA is to prevent future harm by eliminating the latent errors that often underlie adverse events (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2017, June). For this assignment, you will read the case provided and conduct an RCA. Detailed instructions are provided after the case.

You are the Patient Safety Officer in a 436-bed acute care hospital located in the northeastern part of the United States. You have just returned to your office following a meeting with your leadership team when you are advised of a patient safety incident that has occurred in the Medical-Surgical Unit. The following details are the narrative submitted by the unit’s nurse supervisor via your hospital’s online incident reporting system.

Friday, April 13, 2018 – 7:46 p.m. Having just come on duty and receiving report from the day shift nurse, the night shift nurse was rounding on her patients when she expressed concerned about one of her patients – Mr. M – who is scheduled for orthopedic surgery the following day. She indicates to the nurse supervisor that “Mr. M’s case does not seem as simple as the day shift nurse indicated during her report.” This prompted further investigation. The night shift nurse’s report is as follows:

62-year-old, 285-pound male admitted through the emergency department (ED) following a fall at home. Patient stated he heard a loud pop in his left hip. Patient states that the same hip was previously fractured two years ago resulting in compression hip screw placement. Orthopedics saw the patient; x-rays ordered which show an intracapsular fracture (break occurs below the ball or in the neck of the femur) at the site of the previously placed hardware. Morphine pump ordered for pain. Patient placed on low-flow oxygen (4 liters per minute). Surgery planned for following morning. Patient’s medical history documented, preoperative labs ordered, and the consent was signed. Patient is on Coumadin (blood thinners) for a history of blood clots in his lungs that occurred after his previous hip fracture surgery. Chest x-ray: normal. Although Coumadin was suspended for surgery, patient’s blood noted to be mildly thinned. Other past history: significant for emphysema (on home oxygen), hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus, patient still smokes, moderate alcohol consumption. Social history: divorced (10 years), three grown children (all reside out of state), lives alone with therapy dog.

Friday, April 13, 2018 – 8:58 p.m. Night shift nurse checked on Mr. M to find him responsive, but very lethargic. He had been on the unit for about 4 hours. Morphine pump was started upon arrival. Patient denies pain. Vital signs: Heart rate and blood pressure normal, respirations shallow, oxygen saturation at 84% (should be greater than 90%). Respiratory therapy called. Upon arrival, oxygen flow increased to 6 liters per minute; oxygen saturation increased to 93%. Attending physician contacted to report changes in the patient’s condition. Physician indicated that he is not familiar with Mr. M; stated that he was newly assigned to the case when the patient arrived at the ED. He informed the night shift nurse that he thinks that Mr. M “got too much narcotic.” Physician placed an order to hold the morphine pump and to “keep an eye on the patient.” The night shift nurse placed the patient on a continuous oxygen monitoring (via right index finger) which would notify her if his oxygen level dropped again. The night shift nurse indicated that she felt uneasy about the care plan, but “at least the doctor knew what was going on.”

Saturday, April 14, 2018 – 6:43 a.m. Day shift nurse was preparing to give end-of-shift report at the nurse’s station. Patient care technician rushed out of Mr. M’s room indicating that she was having difficulty arousing him during morning check of vital signs. Upon entering Mr. M’s room, day shift nurse finds him unconscious with shallow respirations and elevated heart rate. Code Blue called. Patient intubated, placed on a respirator, and transferred to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Surgery cancelled.

From a systems thinking approach, conduct an RCA for this case using the attached Root Cause Analysis and Action Plan grid. For this assignment, you will analyze the sequence of events leading to the error to identify how the event occurred (through identification of active errors) and why the event occurred (through systematic identification and analysis of latent errors). From there, develop an action plan to be put in place to prevent such an event from occurring in the future.

Length: 3–4 pages

References: Include a minimum of 3 peer-reviewed, scholarly resources.

Your assignment should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts that are presented in the course and provide new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your assignment should also reflect graduate-level writing and APA standards (6th ed.).

References:

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2017, June). Root cause analysis. Retrieved from https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primers/primer/10/root-caus…

American Society for Quality. (n.d.). What is root cause analysis (RCA)? Retrieved from http://asq.org/learn-about-quality/root-cause-anal…

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient”for a 15% Discount!”


Buy Custom Nursing Papers

The post analyze root cause of patient event appeared first on Student Homeworks.

what is decision tree in a case study

Decision Tree

For this Assignment, as you examine the client case study, consider how you might assess and treat adult and older adult clients presenting symptoms of a mental health disorder.

Learning Objectives: Students will:

  • Evaluate clients for treatment of mental health disorders
  • Analyze decisions made throughout diagnosis and treatment of clients with mental health disorders

The Actual Assignment

Examine Case 1: You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the diagnosis and treatment for this client. Be sure to consider co-morbid physical as well as mental factors that might impact the client’s diagnosis and treatment.

At each Decision Point, stop to complete the following:

  • Decision #1: Differential Diagnosis
    • Which Decision did you select?
    • Why did you select this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
    • What were you hoping to achieve by making this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
    • Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #1 and the results of the Decision. Why were they different?
  • Decision #2: Treatment Plan for Psychotherapy
    • Why did you select this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
    • What were you hoping to achieve by making this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
    • Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #2 and the results of the Decision. Why were they different?
  • Decision #3: Treatment Plan for Psychopharmacology
    • Why did you select this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
    • What were you hoping to achieve by making this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
    • Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #3 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?
  • Also include how ethical considerations might impact your treatment plan and communication with clients and their family.

Case #1
A woman with personality disorder

SUBJECTIVE

Rhonda is a 32-year-old Hispanic female who presents to your office for her initial appointment. When you ask what brought her to your office, she states: “I’m at the end of my rope, I don’t know what else to do.” She then bursts into tears. Rhonda explains that she has very few friends left, and everyone seems to have “abandoned” her. Rhonda explains that she goes out of her way to help other people, and to be nice to them, but this does not seem to help.

Rhonda then stands up and begins to pace around your office at times using wild hand gestures to explain the circumstances that led up to her making the appointment with you. She describes the recent breakup with her boyfriend as traumatic and explains “when we first met, he was the best guy in the world. He treated me really well. But he just became a complete monster! Even though he broke off the relationship with me, I was glad to see it end. I hate his guts!”

Rhonda explains that her current financial situation is also precarious. She states that she recently purchased an automobile, and is not certain how she is going to pay for it. She states that she had a car that was repossessed last year at that time, and that she borrowed some money from a friend to help pay for the car; the friend later turned around and accused her of theft. “It was my friend’s fault. She told me she would loan me the money and then backed out. I only took the money because she said she would loan it to me … people just can’t go back on their word like that when other people are counting on them.”

Rhonda reports that she was “always in trouble” as a kid. She states that people were always picking on her, to which she adds: “the other kids my age were just stupid. They didn’t know how to have fun.” She says “I have always been impulsive, but it’s fun. Sometimes people can be such prudes … you only go around life once, so you have to make the best of it.”

OBJECTIVE

Rhonda is currently single. She has no children. Educationally, she had completed two semesters toward her bachelor of arts degree in fine arts. Rhonda currently works as a waitress at a local restaurant. She has held this job for about 2 weeks. Prior to this, Rhonda worked as a housekeeper for a local hotel chain. She states that she was fired from this job because her coworkers were jealous of her and “planted” evidence of her stealing from hotel patrons. She was also arrested for cashing checks under an alias, for which she spent 120 days in jail.

Rhonda has a history of multiple incarcerations for offences ranging from larceny to possession of controlled substances to possession of an illegal firearm. She was also arrested several times for fighting and on at least one occasion, used a baseball bat to beat up a girl who she thought was trying to “set her up” with the police.

MENTAL STATUS EXAM

Rhonda is alert and oriented × 4 spheres. Her speech is clear, coherent, goal directed, and spontaneous. She reports her mood as “terrible!” Affect is labile and seems to change rapidly with the subject being discussed. Her eye contact is normal, but at times, she appears to stare at you. Rhonda is oriented to person, place, and time. She denies visual/auditory hallucinations, no overt paranoia or delusional thought processes noted. Rhonda denies any suicidal or homicidal ideation.

Decision Point One

BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SCENARIO ABOVE, WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING DIAGNOSES WOULD THE PSYCHIATRIC/MENTAL HEALTH NURSE PRACTITIONER (PMHNP) GIVE TO RHONDA?

In your write-up of this case, be certain to link specific symptoms presented in the case to DSM–5 criteria to support your diagnosis.

Number 3 : Antisocial Personality Disorder is my Decision One

Decision Point Two

BASED ON THIS DIAGNOSIS, SELECT YOUR CHOICE OF ACTIONS:

Number 1 : Refer to psychologist for psychological testing is my Decision Two

RESULTS OF DECISION POINT TWO

  • Client returns to clinic in four weeks
  • The psychologist’s report indicates that a comprehensive psychological battery was performed for the purposes of diagnostic clarification. The end result suggested that Rhonda has traits of multiple personality disorders, but scores highest in antisocial personality traits, suggesting antisocial personality disorder.
  • When Rhonda returns to the office, you review the psychologist’s report with her. Rhonda seems upset, but also states “well, that’s why I am here, to get better … what do I need to do?”

Decision Point Three

BASED ON THE ABOVE INFORMATION, SELECT YOUR NEXT ACTION. BE CERTAIN TO DISCUSS THE RATIONALE FOR YOUR DECISION.

Number 1 : Refer to group-based cognitive behavior therapy is my Decision Three

Guidance to Student

Referral to a psychologist was appropriate for the purposes of diagnostic clarification. Psychological tests can help tease out the actual personality disorder that Rhonda has. In this case, Rhonda’s symptoms are most consistent with antisocial personality disorder, but as you can see, she has signs/symptoms of other personality disorders.

Of the available choices, group-based cognitive behavior therapy may be useful in treating individuals with this personality disorder, but all “improvement” in signs/symptoms should be met with great skepticism.

Dialectical behavior therapy is ineffective in people with APD.

Beginning Latuda is not appropriate, as there are currently no FDA-approved medications to treat APD. Also, prescribing medications to someone with antisocial personality disorder could lead to misuse or diversion.

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient”for a 15% Discount!”

We have Walden University and Capella University nursing practitioners!


Buy Custom Nursing Papers