History8A-Question(S) – This Post Must Be At Least 200 Words.

Question(s)

–This chapter (and lecture) talked about colonial administration. What did you find unusual, strange, or even infuriating about how the Spanish crown organized society?

(optional)– in “Scandal at the Church”, What is surprising? What is not surprising? What are the elements of calidad?

lecture—–

It didn’t take long after arriving in the Americas that the Spanish and Portuguese governments began trying to organize the hemisphere– at least their parts of it. 

Of course, it is important to remember that even though the violent portion of the conquest was mainly over, other forms of conquest began. Therefore, although the larger military conquest of indigenous folks had pretty much ended (there were regions in Latin America where it almost never ended, keep in mind– but those were smaller conflicts, nothing on the scale of the larger conquest), the spiritual conquest continued (the church!), and the political conquest began to get more serious and organized.

Before we talk about the different offices and the Spanish and Portuguese administration of the colonies in Latin America, it is important to restate something that your reading points out at the beginning of the chapter:

Traveling to Latin America was a pain in the backside. 

(of course, your book puts it a bit differently, maybe more nicely, but still…)

Just to emphasize this, I want to post the Table from your reading:

Sailing Time Table

Days from Andalusian port to                         Days to Andalusian Port from

   Canary Island                       18                                  Azores                      31

   Hispaniola                            51                                  Florida                       65

   Havana                                 64                                  Havana                      67

   Cartagena                             51                                  Cartagena                  110

   Vera Cruz                             75                                  Vera Cruz                  128

   Isthmus of Panama              75                                Isthmus of Panama   137

The distance and time that it took to get from the Iberian peninsula (Spain and Portugal) to the colonies in Latin America is important, because it meant a few things (and I’ll say it my way, thank you very much!):

1) What happened in Latin America, stayed in Latin America (technically it didn’t, but the time lag between the two places meant that it effectively did)

2) The church became powerful– even more powerful than they were in Spain and Portugal. The reason for this, of course, was that they were the ones in charge of converting indigenous folks, making sure they remained Christians, forced “Christian” values on them, etc. In many ways, the church was what organized indigenous life in Latin American cities, either explicitly or implicitly. On top of all that, they tended to govern– not directly, mind you– not only the natives, but the Spanish and Portuguese settlers in their respective regions, because remember– Portugal and Spain were still Catholic kingdoms!!!

3) Spanish and Portuguese settlers acknowledged the crowns’ established governments in their given regions, but ultimately, their connection to the crown became more theoretical as time passed. (For example, in Colonial Mexico, after some time had passed, a famous saying developed whenever there were new laws passed down directly from the crown: “Obedezco pero no cumplo” [“I obey, but I do not comply”]. Complicated, I know, but it demonstrates that over time, settlers in particular found their ties to the Spanish monarchy weakening, even as the colonial government became stronger. 

That being said, in the early period, there were serious efforts by the Spanish crown to ensure that they had power over everyone else. Government in Spanish America was, after all, very much a top-down affair (this means that all of the power in government was held at the top (Spanish officials), and very little power was held at the bottom (Indians, peasants). City life was punctuated by reminders of the centrality of the king and his representative, the viceroy. Across the whole colonial period, city dwellers were called out from their homes by noisy processions to welcome a new viceroy, celebrate the birth of a royal heir or mourn the death of their king. These eventssurprising and irregularwere extravagantly commemorated and they also afforded spectators a visual lesson on politics.

The point here is that the Spanish crown, aaalllllll the way out in Spain (across an ocean!) recognized the importance of maintaining control over the colonies. Why? Well, if we were to put our finger on something directly, it would be that there was a lot of money in mineral deposits (mainly silver, but other metals as well) in Latin America (cities like Zacatecas in Mexico, and Potos in Peru [which is now Bolivia]) come to mind, but there was also quite a lot of land to make a profit from, especially as people started arriving in this region of the world to settle down!

And because the income was so important to them, they did everything they could to strike a balance between (A) keeping a tight grip on the colonies, and (B) letting them do what they liked. 

Keeping a tight grip on the colonies was done through the creation of institutions like The Council of the Indiesfounded in 1524, to oversee just about everything in the colonies.

The Viceroys were the “executives”, or the direct representative of the king in the colonies (In New Spain, Peru, New Granada, Rio de la Plata)– kind of like the President, if we were to make weird comparisons (it’s a weird comparison because they aren’t really the same, but I wanted you guys to know that this guy was the one who had the most power).

In fact, he had enough power to take whatever new laws and regulations that were passed across the Atlantic ocean from the Spanish crown and say, “obedezco pero no cumplo.” Now, I mentioned this earlier, but check this out– there are two things going on here:

1) When the Viceroy says, “obedezco pero no cumplo” (to himself and his friends, not the crown!), he is basically saying, “I understand what you are saying, but you have no idea what it is like out here! Maybe I’ll implement that law later, but if I do it now, s*&t’s going to get real.” (excuse the mild and censored profanity).

2) The end result of this is what I mentioned earlier in this lecture– the grip that the crown holds on the region begins to weaken, and the administrators (who are still very much European Spaniards and Portuguese) end up wielding more power. The other thing that ends up happening is that the colonial government starts doing their own thing. Obviously, the way it is set up, people who are not from pure Spanish blood are not really eligible for any positions in the colonial government, so they were outside of the sphere of power. But there was another way that they divided people– through creating a social division between people of Spanish blood who were actually born in Spain (Peninsulares), and people of Spanish blood who were born in the Americas. This class division created a lot of tension, and also enabled the folks in the upper levels of colonial government (Peninsulares) to shut out people who were aspiring to get into higher positions within the government (often, Criollos).  Although with the financial problems that the Spanish crown was facing in the late 1500s, the King made it legal to sell higher administrative and political positions to the highest bidder, in an effort to create more revenue. 

This would usually freak out the crown (and in truth, it did!), but the Spanish crown, in many ways, had some good back up: the Catholic Church.

As you know from your earlier readings (and the lectures!), the relationship between the fractured kingdom of Spain and the Catholic Church was very strong. This is mainly because together, over a period of more than 700 years, they fought together to expel Muslims out of what is today called Spain and Portugal. (It was called the “Reconquista”). The Reconquista ended in 1492, just around the time that the Spanish were arriving (“discovering”) the western hemisphere. Upon their arrival, finding people who did not practice Catholicism,the Spanish crown and the Catholic Church made it part of their mission to Christianize everyone– it’s the spiritual conquest! And why wouldn’t they? It worked during the Reconquista! 

Of course, that took over 700 years, but still!

In any case, the relationship between the Spanish crown and the Catholic Church was strong, so even though the viceroy and the different institutions wielded a lot of power, the church also had a lot of power as well, which was almost like an insurance policy for the Spanish crown (and the Portuguese!). The relationship between the Church and the Spanish crown was solidified through the patronato real (or Royal Patronage), which essentially meant that the Spanish crown paid money to the Catholic Church in exchange for being in charge of preaching to and converting the native folks throughout the Americas. 

Sure, there were some issues. As you might have noticed in the trailer for La Otra Conquista, the conversion of the Native folks was brutal and violent. Making this situation more difficult for the Catholic clerics was the fact that there were so many Natives!

Well, sure, disease and violence killed many natives, but among those who remained, they were all part of different cultures, they had different languages, and they had different religious beliefs. From the perspective of a Catholic Priest, this was an extremely difficult situation– because each group that they encountered, they had to start almost from scratch. They had to 

1) learn the language again, or at least learn how to communicate,

2) find ways to understand the new native religion they encountered and tell them why Christianity was better,…

Response To Discussion On Federal Budget Deficit

Business Finance

RESPOND TO THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION QUESTIONS:

DISCUSSION 1:

Budget Deficit is the excess spending over the revenue of the government which leads to accumulation of public sector debt. There are various areas where it is mandatory for the government to spend its revenue while other areas are necessary but do need toneed excessive spending. The Federal government can minimize budget deficit by collecting more than it can spend which is unlikely in the present political atmosphere. However, the government needs to differentiate between mandatory areas and essential areas of spending (Amadeo, 2013).

Investment in space science could be a waste of money and resources since the efforts to explore the moon ceased after the discovery that Russia had no global advantage of such spending. Furthermore, the spending on space science does not benefit the country’s economy as well as taxpayers (Bowles, 2014).Cutting spending on general science, space and technology by 20% will allow the federal government to allow the federal government to direct their funds in veteran service. The government also needs to cut down the spending in the admissionof justice and general government by 20%. Such reductions of the budget will minimizeexcessive use of federal resources by government officials.

According to Bowles (2012),the federalbudget deficit could be the gravest threat to national security. The solution needs some economic growth through simplification of the tax codes, widening the tax base and avoiding back-door investments of tax breaks. Obama’s government made a mistake by focusing on cutting Medicaid and various changes in socialsecurity like a new formulafor determining benefits and a higher retirement age. The decision would eventually lead to a federalbudget deficit due to misplacement of funds.

On the other hand,the government needs to increase their spending on Veteranservices by 2.5%. The move will help improve the lives of military officers upon discharge from active military services due to disability or permanentinjuries. Also, there is a needto cut the budget for the healthcare cost. According to Bowles (2012),the rate of growth of healthcare cost need be at 1% on a maximal level. However, the current figures seem to be in excess regarding the GDP growth. The government can cut healthcarecosts by 10% through the developmentof mandatorysavings to replace the Affordable Care Act and addressing the high medical prices.

According to Bai (2012),it is either MrObama embraces the painful cuts in social security or Medicarebenefits or contemplateson raising taxes. Both Obama and Boehner clung to their separate ideologies of improving budget deficit with each part reluctantto discuss on the common stand for the well-being of the country’s economy. Obama and Boehner had entered an agreement of re-writing the tax codes, roll back tax of the cost of entitlementand slash the deficit. However, the two clashed after Obama receivingpressure from the Democratsand he immediately demanded the republican to accedeto hundredsof billionsof additional tax revenue (Bai, 2012).

The president’s federal budget is more of a no profit generation hence leading to a budgetdeficit. Most areas of the budget needed cutting with the aim of keeping it below $1,100B deficit. Iwas able to come up with a $1089.3B deficit through cutting various budgets across the board. The new deficitincluded a reduction of international affairs, general science and technology, energy transport and regional development by 20%. Also, the health sector and income security werereduced by 10%.

Due to the government’s increased spending on unemployment benefits, welfare, housing assistance, food stamps, and other need-based programs and reduced revenues, in 2015 the nation’s deficit fell to $439 billion with $3.25 trillion of revenue and $3.69 trillion of spending.

References

Amadeo, K. (2013). How the 2012 Budget Created the 2011 Debt Ceiling Crisis. Retrieved from https://www.thebalance.com/fy-2012-u-s-federal-bud…

Bai, M. (2012, March 28). Obama vs. Boehner: Who Killed the Debt Deal? Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/01/magazine/obama-vs-boehner-who-killed-the-debt-deal.html?pagewanted=all (Links to an external site.)

Bowles, E. (2014, August 01). The Danger of Doing Nothing. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2012/03/the-danger-of-doing-nothing

DISCUSSION 2:

Using the National Budget Simulation and taking into account that the United States is subject to security concerns, there is a lingering recession and a financial market rescue package is forcing the government to increase spending. I increased international affairs, community and regional development; education, training, employment, social services, and general government all by 5%. This left total spending at $3714 billion, and total revenues at $2450.2 billion. Leaving a new budget deficit of -$1263.8 billion.

In order for the President to keep his campaign promise of keep the budget deficit below $1100 billion, and still being able to cope with the security concerns and lingering recession, I chose to cut spending, and increase taxes. This is an example of contractionary fiscal policy. “Contractionary fiscal policy is implemented through decreases in government expenditures and/or increases in taxes to achieve macroeconomic goals” (Arnold, 2019). To reach the desired budget deficit it would be difficult to reach with only budget cuts or increased taxes alone, in this situation I think it would be best to use both budget cuts and increased taxes to reach a budget deficit of $1100 billion. “We also can’t solve the problem just by raising taxes. That wouldn’t address the fact that demographics have changed and health care costs are increasing at a much faster rate than GDP. And we can’t solve it entirely with cuts” (Bowles, 2014).

General Science, space, and technology were decreased by 15%. Energy was decreased by 7.5%. Natural resources and environment were decreased by 7.5%. Agriculture, transportation, health, and income security were all decreased by 5%. Veterans benefits and services were decreased by 10%. Administration of justice was decreased by 15%. These budget cuts brought the budget deficit to 1154.24, and increased taxes would have to be put in place to get the budget deficit to $1100 billion. Individual income tax would increase from 1132.2 to 1172.2 and Corporate income taxes would increase from 242.3 to 262.3. This increase in taxes would bring the total revenues up from 2450.2 to 2510.2. The new budget deficit with the budget cuts and the increased taxes would be $1094.2475 billion. Reducing government spending and increasing taxes would help to get the economy out of a recessionary gap by shifting the long run aggregate supply curve to the left, bringing the economy back into equilibrium. Since the government spending is being reduced and the budget deficit is also reduced. The government can borrow less money, leading to lower interest rates.

References:

Arnold, R. A. (2019). Economics (12th ed.). Cengage.

Bowles, E. (2014, August 01). The Danger of Doing Nothing. Retrieved February 19, 2019, from https://hbr.org/2012/03/the-danger-of-doing-nothin…

PLEASE CITE ALL WORK

Think about risk vs. benefit when formulating your response to the discussion board. Using the principles of management and delegation how might the RN have: Approached the supervisor?

Scenario: The Registered Nurse arrives to begin the shift on a busy medical-surgical floor and disco Show more Scenario: The Registered Nurse arrives to begin the shift on a busy medical-surgical floor and discovers the other RN scheduled to work has called in sick. The patient census is 30. Two unlicensed assistive personnel (UAP) have been assigned to the unit. The RN is responsible for administering all patients medications during the shift. One of the patients who is very ill requires the use of transmission-based precautions for chicken pox. The RN approaches the room to administer the medication notes the sign about the type of transmission-based precaution for this patient and thinks I dont need to use the precautions. The RN enters the patients room and hangs the intravenous medication. Upon leaving the RN thinks See I was only in there less than 5 minutes and no harm done. The greater good is I can get the other medications out to patients that need them now. Consider the chain of infection as you prepare a response to this situation. What are the implications of the RNs decision about the application of transmission based precautions? Are there any reasons that support the RNs action? Think about risk vs. benefit when formulating your response to the discussion board. Using the principles of management and delegation how might the RN have: Approached the supervisor? Assigned the staff? Ensured safe patient outcomes? Using nursing judgment develop a 3 part nursing diagnosis statement for the patient on isolation which includes one NANDA-I diagnosis an etiology and the defining characteristics (nursing diagnosis + related to + as evidenced by). One (1) assessment to validate the nursing diagnosis. One (1) outcome statement (realistic measureable and contains a time frame). In your responses to your peers posts provide constructive and insightful comments that go Show less

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get a Discount!

The post Think about risk vs. benefit when formulating your response to the discussion board. Using the principles of management and delegation how might the RN have: Approached the supervisor? appeared first on Premium Academic Affiliates.

Employer Drug Testing Programs

Business Finance

my topic is: The Pros and Cons of Employer Drug Testing Programs
In a 1500-1800 word paper, explore a subject within the discipline of Human Resources. Paper should include an overview of the subject explored, the student’s opinion or feedback on the subject, and the student is welcome to include any research that presents an opposing view on the subject.

  • Paper must adhere to APA formatting guidelines.
  • Your paper should include at least three academic references.
  • As always, ideas and information that are not your own must be cited in the body of the paper.